|
Cyberbia
Moneyline
Issues
Opinion
Sports
Nightlife
Free
Classifieds
Bookstore
Bulldog
Search
Viewer
E-mail
Advertise With Us
Masthead
Top
Stories
College Sports
Cyberculture
Environment
Fraternities
Human Rights
Internet
Napster
Pop Music
Science
Student Loans
Sororities
Technology
Bulldog News
California Star
Clovis Free Press
Daily Republican
Fresno Republican
Mother Wired
Reagan Library
SierraPortal.com
Tower District News
ValleyPress.com
WebPortal.com
Yosemite News
Yosemite
Bookstore
Ahwahnee Hotel
Auto House of Clovis
Aluisi
Real Estate
Cerro Negro Music
Clovis Planetarium
FresnoIncomeProperties
Your Fresno Broker
Majestic Pawn
Onomuse Productions
PC Paramedics
Presentations
Inc.
Roger
Rocka's
Save FSU Soccer
The 2nd Space
Tower 2000 Jukebox
Wetlands Conservation
WAC
Newslink:
Boise State
Hawaii
Louisiana Tech
Rice
San Jose State
SMU
TCU
UTEP
Tulsa
Scores:
College
Football Scores
Sporting News
USA
Today
MSNBC
CNNSI
FOX
CBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 10, 2006
A Response To
Our
Leadership Crisis
By Professor Jeffrey S. Nielsen
A recent survey by U.S. News & World Report and the Center
for Public Leadership at the John
F. Kennedy School of Government,
Harvard University (October, 2005) revealed that seventy-three
percent of Americans have no confidence in their leaders and over
60 percent believe the U.S. is experiencing a leadership crisis.
The
almost daily news stories about the corruption, incompetence, and
poor judgment of some leaders and the criminal activity that seems
so easily to infect leadership practices has created a growing
sense that something is terribly wrong in our democracy and in
our business corporations. In almost every type of organization;
be it social, corporate, religious, or governmental, we have observed
some with leadership rank--the organizational elites-- take advantage
of their power and position to conceal the truth or to extract
unfairly wealth and resources in order to benefit themselves, enrich
their friends, and further their own ambitions. All of this comes
at the expense of those beneath them in the hierarchy.
Americans
are, however, by nature optimistic. So the survey did show that
those interviewed were hopeful, in the future, better leaders
would emerge. Yet, perhaps now is the time to ask why we believe
future leaders will be any better than our current ones? Is it
possible that the fundamental cause of the troubles in our democratic
and business organizations is our very model of leadership? Perhaps
now is the time to examine our nearly universal belief that leaders
and leadership are necessary and begin to explore an alternative
to following leaders. The key lesson to be learned at the beginning
of the twenty-first century might very well be that we can function
quite well and successfully in business and government without
rank-based leaders.
David Bohm, the late physicist and social thinker, first raised
this possibility for me. Though we’ve all been taught that
society cannot function without leaders, he would say, “Maybe
we can.” Have we ever asked ourselves why we think we need
leaders, or what the implications are of this unexamined belief?
Unfortunately, in our organizations most make rank-based assumptions
I have named the myth of leadership. The myth of leadership is
the ideology that serves to establish, maintain, and legitimize
the system of authority where a select few are privileged to monopolize
the information, control most decision-making, and command obedience
even through coercive and manipulative means. This ideology creates
the powerful belief that it is natural and correct that a few individuals
should be anointed leaders and trusted to make the decisions and
do the commanding and controlling of everyone else. It leads to
the assumption that the only way to get things done is by managing
organizations with individuals in rank-based leadership positions;
so many of us willingly relinquish the control of our own choices
and our own life to someone in a position of hierarchical authority.
Even in our democracy, we allow our elected representatives to
govern in secrecy and the leaders of our democratic institutions
to manage people and affairs too often in an autocratic fashion.
These false assumptions, about both leaders and followers, leave
in their wake detrimental consequences for both.
Leadership implies ranking, division, and separation. Whenever
we think in terms of “leadership” we create a dualistic
world. We create a dichotomy, two categories: one of leaders, a
select and privileged few; and the second of followers, the vast
majority. There follows the implicit judgment that leaders are
somehow superior or better than their followers. An entire leadership
industry helps keep this illusion alive, while government and corporate
hierarchies are set up to pamper with privilege those in executive
positions. So you get secrecy, distrust, overindulgence, and the
inevitable sacrifice of those below for the benefit and advantage
of those above. Just think of the special treatment and the huge
amount of resources wasted on perks for our elected and appointed
representatives, our leaders in Washington, who theoretically,
at least, are supposed to be our servants and from whom we get
so little in return by way of wise government, integrity, or competence.
When we use the word “leadership,” we immediately create
a ranked division of people in ways that do not serve healthy,
long-term organizational relationships. The appointed leaders are
saddled with impossible burdens, and the followers are left with
few opportunities, or resources, for growth. There is a problem
with our very concept of leader and practice of leadership. The
heart of this problem is the corruption of communication they cause.
I have learned, through much good and bad experience, genuine
communication tends to occur only between peers, and secrecy more
often than not breeds corruption and abuse of power. We only tell
people we think are superior to us what we think they want to hear,
and we only tell people we believe are somehow inferior to us what
we think they need to know. And that’s directly tied to secrecy,
keeping secrets from each other because in the absence of full
communication, individuals, out of insecurity, feel the need to
defend their position by protecting what they know. Of course,
this leads to even less real communication where the open flow
of information is restricted and secrets reign. In the rarified
heights of rank-based leadership, it is easy to think that the
ordinary rules don’t apply, and so the temptation of unethical
actions tends to overwhelm even the most sincere individual. It
should not be unexpected when organizations, or governments for
that matter, which practice the rank thinking of the myth of leadership
find poor communication the norm, discover a growing gap between
reality and the mindset of the top executives, and perhaps even
wind up in court facing civil charges and criminal indictments.
The remedy is not to find some new leader, to whom we surrender
our future, but we must decide to create genuine democracy in our
country and real peer-based organizations at work. Peer-based organizations
rest on the belief that everyone in the organization should have
equal privilege to share in information, participate in the decision-making
process, and choose to follow through persuasive means. As long
ago as Aristotle, it was recognized that the wisdom of the many
is frequently better than the expertise of the few in making many
types of decisions, including public policy ones.
Today, the open
software movement has realized the effectiveness of leaderless
decision-making. They have a saying that to many eyes all bugs
are shallow; meaning that the less centralization and the more
involvement and greater participation you can get in solving
problems, the better the result. The viability of the Linux O.S.
demonstrates the possibility of functioning well without rank-based
leaders. When we learn to collaborate together as peers in our
communities and in our government and work organizations, we discover
that our shared wisdom, together in peer deliberation, makes it
unnecessary to surrender to some rank-based leader control over
our lives and the decisions that so profoundly affect us.
The answer, then, to our current leadership crisis is to replace
the concept of leader and model of leadership with the practice
of peer-based managing through peer councils. Peer councils are
similar to the elementary republics Thomas Jefferson endorsed at
the founding of the United States. Now, unlike in his day, technology
and the information processing capability in our business and political
environments make peer councils, as a vehicle for governance, much
more realistic. Jefferson’s dream of decentralized self-government
might finally be possible through the implementation of a council-based
democracy and peer-based work organizations. The mechanics of managing
work through peer councils, whether it is administering government
or business, requires learning the competency of peer deliberation.
A competency we all can and should learn to take back our democracy
and make our organizational lives more meaningful. We must demand
that our government and all of our organizations become more peer-based.
This means we need less leadership and more self-government and
peer participation, which require greater openness with information
and greater transparency in decision-making processes, including
more involvement and participation by all affected parties. Peer
thinking is, in fact, necessary for a successful democracy. It
aptly captures and expresses the values of liberty, equality, and
autonomy that are fundamental to democratic beliefs. Countries
where rank thinking dominates will find democratic rhetoric is
merely a cover for more oligarchic special interests.
We need to recognize and build our democracy and our work organizations
on the basic peer principle that we all share the equal privilege
to speak and likewise possess the equal and reciprocal obligation
to listen regardless of our place or position in society. We are
at a crossroads in our history where we can make the choice to
remain satisfied with surrendering information and decision-making
authority, and hence control of our lives, to the next round of
rank-based political and business leaders, or we can choose to
create peer-based organizations and a greater peer-based democracy.
Our human inclination to cooperate with others makes peer-based
organizations possible. Our human propensity to take advantage
of others makes peer-based organizations necessary.
[Professor Jeffrey Nielsen is an
organizational consultant with international experience. He currently
teaches philosophy at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah,
and is the author of the book, The
Myth of Leadership: Creating Leaderless Organizations, (Davies-Black
Publishing, 2004) which was a finalist for two different 2004
Book of the Year awards, ForeWord Magazine, and Independent Book
Publishers.]
Comment
©1958-2006 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
December 13, 2002
John Rawls Passing,
Friend and Teacher
By Samuel Freeman
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
-- The philosopher John Rawls has died at 81. It's well known that
he had an enormous influence on academic discussions of social,
political, and economic justice: His 1971 book, A Theory of
Justice, is widely recognized as the most significant work
in political philosophy since J.S. Mill's 1869 On Liberty.
So it's not surprising that, even in the short time since Rawls's
death, we have already seen numerous tributes that focus on his
formidable intellectual contributions. But I'd like to add some
personal reflections.
. Rawls's lifelong interest in justice developed
out of his early concern with the basically religious questions
of why there is evil in the world and whether human existence is
nonetheless redeemable. That concern, originating during World War
II, while Rawls was first an undergraduate at Princeton and later
a soldier in the Pacific, led him to inquire whether a just society
is realistically possible. His life's work was aimed at discovering
what justice requires of us, and then showing that it is within
our human capacities to realize it.
Rawls was born in Baltimore into a well-to-do
family. His father was a prominent lawyer and his mother active
in local politics. I was one of his Ph.D. students in the early
1980s, but was inspired by him even before we met. Upon reading
A Theory of Justice after I was already a lawyer, I had
decided to leave the law for graduate work in philosophy. I never
dreamed, then, that I would have the great good fortune to study
with Rawls, as well as to edit some of his work, much less to become
his friend.
Although I cannot be sure, I think Jack
warmed to me because, like his father, I was from North Carolina;
he felt at ease with a relaxed Southern manner and appreciated my
friendly teasing. At the turn of the millennium, for example, the
Modern Library ranked the top 100 nonfiction works in English in
the 20th century. A Theory of Justice placed 28th, high
for a philosophy book, but still bested by Russell and Whitehead's
seminal work in logic, Principia Mathematica, ranked 23rd.
"Jack, you should have worked harder," I joked, and he
laughed heartily.
Jack was a quiet, modest, and gentle man.
He did not seek fame, and he did not enjoy the spotlight. A private
person, he devoted himself to research and teaching, or to relaxing
with his family and friends. He declined almost all requests for
interviews and chose not to take an active role in public life.
In part, that was because he felt uncomfortable speaking before
strangers and large groups, and often stuttered in those settings.
But he also believed that philosophers are almost always misunderstood
when they address the public, and that, while political philosophy
has considerable influence on people's lives, its effects are indirect,
taking many years to become part of society's moral awareness.
In 1999, Jack agreed to accept a National
Humanities Medal from President Clinton, and also the University
of Oxford's Rolf Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
Before those, he had regularly declined honors, because big prizes
and awards made him uncomfortable. Knowing that, Mardy, his wife
of 53 years, reports that when Jack was offered the Kyoto Prize,
carrying $500,000, she declined on his behalf without even consulting
him. When she told him, he said he might accept it, depending on
the conditions. Upon learning, however, that those would require
that he not only give three public lectures but also have lunch
and dinner with the emperor of Japan, Jack reaffirmed the initial
disclaimer. His daughter Liz said he was willing to do a lot of
things, but not have lunch with the emperor. (Indeed, Jack regularly
denounced the practice of royalty and the corrupting effects of
privilege.)
That explains his fondness for Abraham
Lincoln. He admired Lincoln because he saw him as the president
who most appreciated the moral equality of human beings, and because
Lincoln was the rare statesman who did not compromise with evil.
Jack frequently quoted Lincoln's assertion -- "If slavery is
not wrong, nothing is wrong" -- as the best example of a fixed
moral conviction that anyone with a sense of justice must believe.
The rightward drift of American politics
distressed Jack. He said of Congress under Newt Gingrich's management,
"They are destroying our democracy." He was appalled by
the practice of allowing business lobbyists into committee meetings
to help draft legislation. He condemned it, along with our system
of corporate financing of political campaigns, as "selling
the public trust." He judged the current administration and
Congress by the same high standards.
Jack was also a conscientious teacher.
His lectures were carefully prepared and written out, and he continually
revised them after reading the most recent scholarship and rethinking
his positions. He made his lecture notes available to his students,
acknowledging that he sometimes stuttered and was not sure that
he could be understood. A better reason, surely, is that his lectures
were very intense and hard to digest upon one hearing (or even two
or three). Two of three volumes of those lecture notes are now available.
Jack had initially resisted publication, but former students like
Barbara Herman appealed to his sense of fairness by saying that,
while his own students continued to benefit professionally from
his teachings, others could not. He also resisted publishing his
collected papers; he said he saw them as opportunities to experiment
with ideas, which would later be revised or rejected in a book.
When told that students and scholars were spending hours hunting
down his many short essays, he agreed to issue one volume.
Unlike that of most Anglo-American philosophers
of his time, who emphasized the analysis of language, logic, and
concepts, Rawls's work was systematic and driven by a comprehensive
vision. For the most part, it was a dialogue with the great figures
in modern moral and political philosophy -- the social-contractarians
Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau; the utilitarians Hume,
Mill, and Sidgwick; and the German idealists Kant,
Hegel, and Marx. Indeed, not only in its structure but also
in its prose, A Theory of Justice reads like the work of
a 19th-century philosopher. (As his colleague and close friend Burton
Dreben once said, it reads as if translated from German.)
In all his works, Jack was very generous
in citing others, even when they said little that had to do with
his points. Only very rarely did he respond to critics (most notably
to H.L.A. Hart, on liberty), and only then when he felt that their
criticisms were serious and constructive. Most often, he thought
his critics (who are legion) misunderstood him. While self-effacing
in person and in print, Jack was also sparing in his praise. I think
he probably believed what Hume said in criticizing Locke's social
contract (though not in that particular instance): There is little
ever new in philosophy, and that which is new is almost always wrong.
It was not easy handing over one's work to Jack to read.
Jack was, nevertheless, always supportive.
He taught me and his other students to look behind the intricate
or clever arguments that philosophers make, to see whether those
thinkers are doing anything important. At the same time, he encouraged
us to try to discover the best in positions we disagree with, and
to respond to that. He often told us that we should assume that
the philosophers we read "are at least as smart as you are,
and that if you think of an objection, they probably have thought
of it, too."
He was a tall, lanky man, with piercing
blue eyes. He had participated in sports at Princeton and was an
excellent sailor. He exercised until well into his 70s, biking,
jogging, hiking, and he took daily walks until a few days before
his death. Popular legend -- and some obituaries -- to the contrary,
he never played professional baseball. That rumor was fabricated
by a master at Harvard's Leverett House after Jack had hit a number
of home runs in an intramural softball game. The losing students
were distressed at being humiliated by an aging professor, and the
house master assuaged them with the story that Jack, a "ringer,"
had played for the Yankees.
He had a taste for oatmeal cookies served
with tea. Recently, I spent part of an afternoon with him when Mardy
went out to play tennis. She left him a large cookie, which she
felt was all he should have. As I got up to leave, he asked me to
look through the kitchen cabinets for a bag of oatmeal cookies.
Guiltily, I complied and left him the bag. The next afternoon, after
I had eaten some cookies that she had set out, he asked me if I
wanted more. I said that, good as they were, I had better not. He
then called definitively, "Mardy, Sam wants another cookie,
and I think I'll have another one, too." Jack had a mischievous
streak.
In mid-October, I drove out to his rambling
house in Lexington, Mass., carrying the newly published The
Cambridge Companion to Rawls, only the second time a volume
in that wide-ranging series has been devoted to a living philosopher.
(The volume on Jürgen Habermas is the other.) Many of Jack's
students and friends had contributed articles. His portrait, on
the cover, had been painted by his wife. He had objected vigorously
to any picture, saying that he did not see why people cared what
he looked like. Only when I told him that every single volume in
the series had portraits did he cease protesting. He appreciated
the book's tribute, saying, "It looks great, Sam." It
was to be the last time I would see Jack. His wife called on Sunday,
November 24, to tell me that he had died at 9:30 that morning, peacefully
at home, of heart failure. He had his wits until the very end. He
will be greatly missed.
Samuel Freeman is a professor of philosophy
and law at the University of Pennsylvania. He edited John Rawls's
Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, 1999) and the Lectures
in the History of Political Philosophy. He also edited and
contributed to The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge
University Press, 2002).
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
~ Reprise ~
Saturday, May 30, 1998
Senator Goldwater
Dead at 89
By Bart Barnes
NEW
YORK --
Barry M. Goldwater, 1909-1998, a five-term U.S. senator from Arizona
and a champion of conservatism whose 1964 presidential candidacy
launched a revolution within the Republican Party, died yesterday
at home in Paradise Valley, a suburb of Phoenix.
He suffered a stroke in 1996 that damaged
the part of the brain that controls memory and personality. Last
September, family members said he was in the early stages of Alzheimer's
disease. In fact, he had wrested control of the GOP from the Eastern
liberal wing that had dominated it for years. By 1980, he was acknowledged
as the founder of a conservative movement that had become a vital
element in mainstream Republican thinking and a major ingredient
in Reagan's political ascendancy. It was a 1964 speech delivered
on behalf of Mr. Goldwater that brought Reagan to national prominence
and helped launch his political career.
During his 1964 presidential campaign, Mr.
Goldwater was attacked by Democrats and opponents within his own
party as a demagogue and a leader of right-wing extremists and racists
who was likely to lead the United States into nuclear war, eliminate
civil rights progress and destroy such social welfare programs as
Social Security.
But that perception mellowed with time.
Mr. Goldwater returned to the Senate in 1969 and went on to serve
three more terms. Long before his retirement, he had come to be
regarded as the Grand Old Man of the Republican Party and one of
the nation's most respected exponents of conservatism, which he
sometimes defined as holding on to that which was tested and true
and opposing change simply for the sake of change.
His friends said he was often misunderstood,
but his reputation for personal integrity was unblemished. At the
height of the Watergate crisis, when the Republicans in Congress
needed someone to tell President Richard M. Nixon he should resign,
they chose Mr. Goldwater. But instead of telling the president what
to do, Mr. Goldwater simply informed him in the Oval Office on Aug.
7, 1974, that the Republicans in Congress were unwilling and unable
to stop his impeachment and conviction should he remain in office.
Nixon announced his resignation the next day.
A stickler for the Constitution, Mr. Goldwater
refused to join the Republicans of the New Right during the 1980s
when they began to press for legislation that would limit the authority
of the federal courts to curb organized prayer in public schools
or to order busing for school integration. He opposed busing and
he backed prayer in schools, Mr. Goldwater said, but he thought
it a dangerous breach of the separation of powers for Congress to
be telling the courts what to do.
Mr. Goldwater's political philosophy also
included a strong military posture, a deep mistrust of the Soviet
Union and a conviction that increasing the scope of government programs
was not the way to solve social problems.
In all, he served 30 years in the Senate, but he was out of office
for four years after losing his bid for the presidency, and he was
in a political limbo for almost 10 years after that defeat. He reemerged
during the Watergate crisis of the early 1970s.
In 1934, Mr. Goldwater married the former
Margaret Johnson of Muncie, Ind. She died in 1985. Their four children
are Michael, Joanne, Peggy and Barry Jr., who became a Republican
member of the House of Representatives from California and later
an investment counselor. In 1992, he married Susan Schaffer Wechsler,
a health care executive, who survives.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
July 17, 2003
The White Man Unburdened
By Norman Mailer
Lightning and thunder,
shock and awe. Dust, ash, fog, fire, smoke, sand, blood, and a good
deal of waste now move to the wings. The stage, however, remains
occupied. The question posed at curtain-rise has not been answered.
Why did we go to war? If no real weapons of mass destruction are
found, the question will keen in pitch.
Or, if some weapons are uncovered in Iraq,
it is likely that even more have been moved to new hiding places
beyond the Iraqi border. Should horrific events take place, we can
count on a predictable response: "Good, honest, innocent Americans
died today because of evil al-Qaeda terrorists." Yes, we will
hear the President's voice before he even utters such words. (For
those of us who are not happy with George W. Bush, we may as well
recognize that living with him in the Oval Office is like being
married to a mate who always says exactly what you know in advance
he or she is going to say, which helps to account for why more than
half of America now appears to love him.)
The key question remains—why did we go
to war? It is not yet answered. The host of responses has already
produced a cognitive stew. But the most painful single ingredient
at the moment is, of course, the discovery of the graves. We have
relieved the world of a monster who killed untold numbers, mega-numbers,
of victims. Nowhere is any emphasis put upon the fact that many
of the bodies were of the Shiites of southern Iraq who have been
decimated repeatedly in the last twelve years for daring to rebel
against Saddam in the immediate aftermath of the Gulf War. Of course,
we were the ones who encouraged them to revolt in the first place,
and then failed to help them. Why? There may have been an ongoing
argument in the first Bush administration which was finally won
by those who believed that a Shiite victory over Saddam could result
in a host of Iraqi imams who might make common cause with the Iranian
ayatollahs, Shiites joining with Shiites! Today, from the point
of view of the remaining Iraqi Shiites, it would be hard for us
to prove to them that they were not the victims of a double cross.
So they may look upon the graves that we congratulate ourselves
for having liberated as sepulchral voices calling out from their
tombs—asking us to take a share of the blame. Which, of course,
we will not.
Yes, our guilt for a great part of those
bodies remains a large subtext and Saddam was creating mass graves
all through the 1970s and 1980s. He killed Communists en masse in
the 1970s, which didn't bother us a bit. Then he slaughtered tens
of thousands of Iraqis during the war with Iran—a time when we supported
him. A horde of those newly discovered graves go back to that period.
Of course, real killers never look back.
The administration, however, was concerned
only with how best to expedite the war. They hastened to look for
many a justifiable reason. The Iraqis were a nuclear threat; they
were teeming with weapons of mass destruction; they were working
closely with al-Qaeda; they had even been the dirty geniuses behind
9/11. The reasons offered to the American public proved skimpy,
unverifiable, and void of the realpolitik of our need to get a choke-hold
on the Middle East for many a reason more than Israel- Palestine.
We had to sell the war on false pretenses.
The intensity of the falsification could
best be seen as a reflection of the enormous damage 9/11 has brought
to America's morale, particularly the core—the corporation. All
the organization people high and low, managers, division heads,
secretaries, salesmen, accountants, market specialists, all that
congeries of corporate office American, plus all who had relatives,
friends, or classmates who worked in the Twin Towers—the shock traveled
into the fundament of the American psyche. And the American working
class identified with the warriors who were lost fighting that blaze,
the firemen and the police, all instantly ennobled.
It was a political bonanza for Bush provided
he could deliver an appropriate sense of revenge to the millions—
or is it the tens of millions?—who identified directly with those
incinerated in the Twin Towers. When Osama bin Laden failed to be
captured by the posses we sent to Afghanistan, Bush was thrust back
to ongoing domestic problems that did not give any immediate suggestion
that they could prove solution-friendly. The economy was sinking,
the market was down, and some classic bastions of American faith
(corporate integrity, the FBI, and the Catholic Church—to cite but
three) had each suffered a separate and grievous loss of face. Increasing
joblessness was undermining national morale. Since our administration
was conceivably not ready to tackle any one of the serious problems
looming before them that did not involve enriching the top, it was
natural for the administration to feel an impulse to move into larger
ventures, thrusts into the empyrean—war! We could say we went to
war because we very much needed a successful war as a species of
psychic rejuvenation. Any major excuse would do—nuclear threat,
terrorist nests, weapons of mass destruction —we could always make
the final claim that we were liberating the Iraqis. Who could argue
with that? One could not. One could only ask: What will the cost
be to our democracy?
Be it said that the administration knew
something a good many of us did not—it knew that we had a very good,
perhaps even an extraordinarily good, if essentially untested, group
of armed forces, a skilled, disciplined, well-motivated military,
career-focused and run by a field-rank and general staff who were
intelligent, articulate, and considerably less corrupt than any
other power cohort in America.
In such a pass, how could the White House
fail to use them? They would prove quintessential morale-builders
to a core element of American life— those tens of millions of Americans
who had been spiritually wounded by 9/11. They could also serve
an even larger group, which had once been near to 50 percent of
the population, and remained key to the President's political footing.
This group had taken a real beating. As a matter of collective ego,
the good average white American male had had very little to nourish
his morale since the job market had gone bad, nothing, in fact,
unless he happened to be a member of the armed forces. There, it
was certainly different. The armed forces had become the paradigmatic
equal of a great young athlete looking to test his true size. Could
it be that there was a bozo out in the boondocks who was made to
order, and his name was Iraq? Iraq had a tough rep, but not much
was left to him inside. A dream opponent. A desert war is designed
for an air force whose state-of-the-art is comparable in perfection
to a top-flight fashion model on a runway. Yes, we would liberate
the Iraqis.
So we went ahead against all obstacles—of
which the UN was the first. Wantonly, shamelessly, proudly, exuberantly,
at least one half of our prodigiously divided America could hardly
wait for the new war. We understood that our television was going
to be terrific. And it was. Sanitized but terrific —which is, after
all, exactly what network and good cable television are supposed
to be.
| And there were other factors for using our military skills, minor
but significant: these reasons return us to the ongoing malaise
of the white American male. He had been taking a daily drubbing
over the last thirty years. For better or worse, the women's movement
has had its breakthrough successes and the old, easy white male
ego has withered in the glare. Even the consolation of rooting for
his team on TV had been skewed. For many, there was now measurably
less reward in watching sports than there used to be, a clear and
declarable loss.
The great white stars of yesteryear were
for the most part gone, gone in football, in basketball, in boxing,
and half gone in baseball. Black genius now prevailed in all these
sports (and the Hispanics were coming up fast; even the Asians were
beginning to make their mark). We white men were now left with half
of tennis (at least its male half), and might also point to ice
hockey, skiing, soccer, golf (with the notable exception of the
Tiger), as well as lacrosse, track, swimming, and the World Wrestling
Federation—remnants of a once great and glorious white athletic
centrality.
Of course, there were sports fans who loved
the stars on their favorite teams without regard to race. Sometimes,
they even liked black athletes the most. Such white men tended to
be liberals. They were no use to Bush. He needed to take care of
his more immediate constituency. If he had a covert strength, it
was his knowledge of the unspoken things that bothered American
white men the most—just those matters they were not always ready
to admit to themselves. The first was that people hipped on sports
can get overaddicted to victory. Sports, the corporate ethic (advertising),
and the American flag had become a go-for-the-win triumvirate that
had developed many psychic connections with the military.
After all, war was, with all else, the
most dramatic and serious extrapolation of sports. The concept of
victory could be seen by some as the noblest species of profit in
union with patriotism. So Bush knew that a big victory in an easy
war would work for the good white American male. If blacks and Hispanics
were representative of their share of the population in the enlisted
ranks, still they were not a majority, and the faces of the officer
corps (as seen on the tube) suggested that the percentage of white
men increased as one rose in rank to field and general officers.
Moreover, we had knockout tank echelons, Super-Marines, and—one
magical ace in the hole—the best air force that ever existed. If
we could not find our machismo anywhere else, we could certainly
count on the interface between combat and technology. Let me then
advance the offensive suggestion that this may have been one of
the covert but real reasons we went looking for war. We knew we
were likely to be good at it.
In the course, however, of all the quick
events of the last few months, our military passed through a transmogrification.
Indeed, it was one hellion of a morph. We went, willy-nilly, from
a potentially great athlete to serving as an emergency intern required
to operate at high speed on an awfully sick patient full of frustration,
outrage, and violence. Now in the last month, even as the patient
is getting stitched up somewhat, a new and troubling question arises:
Have any fresh medicines been developed to deal with what seem to
be teeming infections? Do we really know how to treat livid suppurations?
Or would it be better to just keep trusting our great American luck,
our faith in our divinely protected can-do luck? We are, by custom,
gung-ho. If these suppurations prove to be unmanageable, or just
too time-consuming, may we not leave them behind? We could move
on to the next venue. Syria, we might declare in our best John Wayne
voice: You can run, but you can't hide. Saudi Arabia, you overrated
tank of blubber, do you need us more than ever? And Iran, watch
it, we have eyes for you. You could be a real meal. Because when
we fight, we feel good, we are ready to go, and then go some more.
We have had a taste. Why, there's a basketful of billions to be
made in the Middle East just so long as we can stay ahead of the
trillions of debts that are coming after us back home.
Be it said: the motives that lead to a
nation's major historical acts can probably rise no higher than
the spiritual understanding of its leadership. While George W. may
not know as much as he believes he knows about the dispositions
of God's blessing, he is driving us at high speed all the same —this
man at the wheel whose most legitimate boast might be that he knew
how to parlay the part-ownership of a major-league baseball team
into a gubernatorial win in Texas. And—shall we ever forget?—was
catapulted, by legal finesse and finagling, into a now-tainted but
still almighty hymn: Hail to the Chief!
No, we will rise no higher than the spiritual
understanding of our leadership. And now that the ardor of victory
has begun to cool, some will see how it is flawed. For we are victim
once again of all those advertising sciences that depend on mendacity
and manipulation. We have been gulled about the real reasons for
this war, tweaked and poked by some of the best button-pushers around
to believe that we won a noble and necessary contest when, in fact,
the opponent was a hollowed-out palooka whose monstrosities were
ebbing into old age.
Perhaps he was not that old. Perhaps Saddam
made a decision to go underground with as much wealth as he had
spirited away, and would fund al-Qaeda or some extension of it in
a collaboration of sorts with Osama bin Laden—a new underground
team, the Incompatible Terrorist Twins. That is a hypothesis as
mad as the world we are beginning to live in.
Democracy, more than any other political
system, depends on a modicum of honesty. Ultimately, it is much
at the mercy of a leader who has never been embarrassed by himself.
What is to be said of a man who spent two years in the Air Force
of the National Guard (as a way of not having to go to Vietnam)
and proceeded—like many another spoiled and wealthy father's son—not
to bother to show up for duty in his second year of service? Most
of us have episodes in our youth that can cause us shame on reflection.
It is a mark of maturation that we do not try to profit from our
early lacks and vices but do our best to learn from them. Bush proceeded,
however, to turn his declaration of the Iraqi campaign's end into
a mighty fashion show. He chose—this overnight clone of Honest Abe—to
arrive on the deck of the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln on an
S-3B Viking jet that came in with a dramatic tail-hook landing.
The carrier was easily within helicopter range of San Diego but
G.W. would not have been able to show himself in flight regalia,
and so would not have been able to demonstrate how well he wore
the uniform he had not honored. Jack Kennedy, a war hero, was always
in civvies while he was commander in chief. So was General Eisenhower.
George W. Bush, who might, if he had been
entirely on his own, have made a world-class male model (since he
never takes an awkward photograph), proceeded to tote the flight
helmet and sport the flight suit. There he was for the photo-op
looking like one more great guy among the great guys. Let us hope
that our democracy will survive these nonstop foulings of the nest.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
Wednesday September 1, 2004
The Law of Averages Isn’t a Safe Bet for
America’s Future
By Sarah Ruth Jacobs
Back in 1999, I stood
waiting on the curb during a balmy summer evening in Bangor, Maine.
I hailed a lone taxi and hopped in, but before I could spurt out
my destination, I was interrupted by the cabbie. Twisting himself
around with one arm, he held out a clipboard to me where I sat in
the back seat, craning his shock-worn face around to look into mine.
"You 18? Mind signing this petition for me? I'm running for
Congress and I can get on the ballot with enough signatures,"
he explained. Even then, I remember thinking, "This guy just
isn't going to make it."
Today I would argue that the mind of America
is likewise poisoned with similar apprehensions. First we worry
that a candidate isn't "electable" and lacks competitive
funding, then we fear that a well funded and supported candidate
has "sold out." We are so jaded about the political process
that we can't decide what we want — an unlikely underdog whom we
love, or a political commodity everyone likes.
How can it be that America, a relatively
new nation where liberties such as independence, suffrage and civil
rights have been fought for and won with blood and prophetic vision,
has had lessening levels of voter and civic participation? Our colleges,
once a haven for resisters and draft dodgers, wild children ready
to take over administrative buildings, now offer largely muted voices
of opinion, small circles of activism. Have we come so far that
there's nothing left to protest? Quite contrarily, most students
and citizens have a long list of complaints about the direction
America is headed.
Discussing what civic engagement entails
and ways to encourage it seems remiss without acknowledging reasons
why people may choose not to participate in even local proceedings
and organizations. When one person neglects to vote or comment,
she isn't simply allowing someone else to speak for her; she's snuffing
out her own voice entirely. Losing these estranged and minority
perspectives in an election isn't just as simple as laxity — it
means that a part of our nation is slipping through the cracks.
If civic leaders don't make the effort to reach out to non-voters,
and dare to take braver stances, then we will be waking up to a
country half-populated by ghosts.
Election strategies are often blinded by
what officials believe to be "target groups" or the undecided
voters — easy marks which may do little more than soften and overextend
a campaign. Democracy is thus often misunderstood as appealing to
the lowest common denominator, whereas Jefferson, Paine and the
founders intended quite the opposite: a sacrifice by the majority
to minority rights and property.
Though it's easy to interpret their ideals
as a mere conservation of goods for the wealthy from the poor majority,
today the meaning of minority rights is understood as an inclusive
and tolerant system of government which doesn't restrict the freedoms
of minority groups.
Thus the best strategy for a candidate isn't
to repeatedly average the difference between herself and the competition,
but (still speaking mathematically) to broaden the span of issues
she supports. That way, instead of appealing to voters who teeter
on the mean of two candidates, there would be a strong appeal to
fringe groups, those people who aren't normally inclined to vote
because the averaging strategy of candidates makes the term "election"
seem a farce. A single candidate can't be all things to everyone,
but once she takes a step to embrace a foggy issue, to clarify a
heartfelt and compassionate viewpoint, perhaps some members will
emerge from the silent half of our nation. In a time where a strong
vision for the future is needed to revitalize the common faith,
it is sorely regrettable that individualism is seen as a detraction
to a candidacy.
Over the years I have taken part in court
hearings, ugly protests, town council meetings, assistance programs
for the homeless and most recently anonymous peer counseling. Again
and again individuals underestimate their role in even local decisions,
or may realize the extent an issue plays in their lives when it
is too late. For many people my age, passion and the gumption to
speak out has become a sign of vulnerability or even foolhardiness.
In an America where politics and business seem to merge, it's no
wonder that citizens are afraid to get hurt, to put themselves out
there. Yet there has never been a time when the need for individual
voices, for "foolhardy" contributions, has been greater.
The law of averages is a static instrument, and it waits for the
change that even one visionary individual can bring.
Across this nation we must come not only
to know but to believe that it takes an individual, not an average
to set the hearts of the people alight. Any doubt we might cast
on the hopes of a smooth-talking cabbie will only serve to shadow
our own ambition.
[Sarah Ruth Jacobs is a junior at
Cornell University studying English and film.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
Wednesday August 11, 2004
Elie Abel respected journalist
and author dead at 83
BY LISA TREI
PALO
ALTO -- Elie Abel, former chair of Stanford's Department of Communication
and a highly respected journalist and author, died July 22 at a
hospice in Rockville, Md. He was 83.
The cause of death
was pneumonia, complicated by a stroke and Alzheimer's disease,
said his daughter, Suzanne Abel, a director at the Haas Center for
Public Service. A memorial service will be held Sept. 19 at the
Cosmos Club in Washington, D.C.
Abel came to Stanford
in 1979 as the first Harry and Norman Chandler Professor of Communication
after serving as dean of Columbia Graduate School of Journalism
for nine years. From 1983 to 1986, Abel headed Stanford's Department
of Communication and also served as Faculty Senate chair in 1985-86.
Abel directed Stanford's
program in Washington, D.C., in 1993-94. "Elie had a profound effect
on improving the quality of two major American universities," said
Henry Breitrose, professor emeritus and former Communication Department
chair who was responsible for hiring Abel in 1979. "He raised the
bar for journalism so that it transcended mere craft and embraced
the world of ideas that a journalist ought to be able to rely on."
Abel was born in
Montreal, Canada, on Oct. 17, 1920. He earned a bachelor's from
McGill University in 1941 and a master's from Columbia Graduate
School of Journalism in 1942.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
Friday, June 11, 2004
Day of Remembrance for President Ronald Reagan
Fresno State News Staff Writers
FRESNO STATE -- Governor Schwarzenegger
has issued a Proclamation declaring Friday, June 11, 2004, as a
day of remembrance for the extraordinary life of President Ronald
Reagan. In support of this action, Chancellor Charles Reed has authorized
presidents to cancel all or part of campus activities, and to provide
informal time off to employees.
This Friday we have a number of academic
instructional activities, particularly in Continuing Education,
that will compel some offices to remain open. For example, there
are about 4000 students on campus for whom Friday is the last day
of instruction. Final exams are being given and papers are being
turned in. Managers of areas involved in these activities should
ensure that services continue to be provided for those faculty and
students who plan to meet on Friday.
These services may be in the academic departments
affected, continuing education, food services, housing, health center,
accounting, child care center, and the library. Employees in other
offices not directly involved in instructional activity may request
informal time off on Friday. Managers are urged to accommodate such
requests. Essential services shall remain open for regular business.
These services include security, environmental health and safety,
university relations, plant operations, human resources, and all
managers. Managers in each area should use their own judgment in
determining the level of staffing needed that day.
Employees who are required to work on this
day, or who would otherwise be scheduled to work but are on vacation,
sick leave or compensating time off, will receive informal time
off to be taken at a later date. The campus will observe a moment
of silence to enable employees who are working to honor the memory
of President Reagan
Comment
©-2004 Fresno State News
|
|
Thur April 29, 2004
Defeat Spyware
By Carl Weinschenk, TechRepublic
FRESNO
STATE -- As if viruses, zombies, Trojans, and other assorted malicious
software weren't enough, businesses of all sizes need to worry about
spyware. This is a big category, ranging from legal software aimed
at tracking the sites a user visits to illegal programs that can
capture passwords, screen names, and keystrokes.
This interview originally appeared in the
IT Business Edge weekly report on Optimizing Infrastructure. To
see a complete listing of IT Business Edge weekly reports or sign
up for this free technology intelligence agent, visit www.itbusinessedge.com.
Question: You don't hear quite as much
about spyware as viruses and spam. But it is a corporate problem.
What do companies need to be aware of? They need to be aware that
there is a whole class of software out there that is not overtly
dangerous—in other words, not a virus and not a worm—but
is basically watching what you do.
Maybe you don't care or maybe you do. In
the same way that spam can clog your computer and is a bloody nuisance,
this stuff can clog your computer and be a nuisance. You need to
be aware that unlike viruses, where one guy probably is writing
it, there's a whole team of people writing this stuff. There's a
reason they are doing it—they make money. Apart from the fact
that it clogs your computer, which is a pretty good start, it can
also be a nuisance as it serves up ads quite aggressively to you,
pop-up ads, and you have to click to close on a bunch of ads before
you can get to work.
The commercial stuff is unlikely
to log your keystrokes. The whole spyware/adware thing runs the
gamut from stuff that is overtly bad like key loggers…to
stuff that simply tracks which Web pages you are going to. [Illegal
spyware] will log your passwords, Social Security number, credit
card number, and eventually send them off to the mothership, whatever
the mothership is. It might be a kid in Canada; it may be the Russian
mafia.Question: What should businesses do for baseline protection?
They have to keep it off
their systems somehow. They have to keep antivirus software or software
like Pest Patrol that's also up to date. There is some overlap between
antivirus software and spy-control software.
Everyone wants to detect
the key loggers, so antivirus software will detect some and antispyware
will detect some. As long as antivirus is up to date, you are probably
pretty protected from key loggers, but the antivirus software doesn't
do much with the commercial spyware.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
April
28, 2004
Sex,
Booze
Winning
Football?
By Murray Sperber Professor of American Studies
Indiana University at Bloomington.
FRESNO
STATE -- Last month the head football coach at the University of
Colorado at Boulder, Gary Barnett, was placed on administrative
leave after he made denigrating comments about a female former kicker
who claimed that she had been raped by another player. It was one
of seven rape charges against Colorado football players and recruits,
and the governor has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate
those charges and other alleged recruiting violations. The scandal
has brought to light how big-time college sports programs throughout
the country use women, alcohol, and sex to recruit top high-school
athletes.
When different
people talk about the incidents, however, it often seems as if they
aren't even conversing in the same language. Consider: "What's so
wrong about taking recruits to a strip club?" (A recent graduate
of Northwestern University, who is now a reporter for a Chicago-area
newspaper) "She [the alleged rape victim] said Barnett told her
that he would 'back his player 100 percent if she took this forward
in the criminal process.'" (Greg Avery, a Boulder, Colo., Daily
Camera reporter) "I have told him [Barnett] in no uncertain terms
that was an unacceptable remark. You have a rape allegation here.
That's a very serious criminal allegation. It is simply inappropriate
to blame the victim, which is what he did." (Elizabeth Hoffman,
president of the University of Colorado System, to the Associated
Press)
Each of those comments
represents a different campus culture. And, at Colorado and potentially
every college with big-time sports, those cultures are colliding.
The Northwestern
graduate genuinely did not understand why underage recruits should
not be taken to a strip club or bar. While he was in college, not
only football players but also regular student hosts did the same
for visiting high-school seniors. Doing the research for my book
Beer & Circus, I encountered that phenomenon at many institutions,
particularly among fraternity men who wanted to impress recruits
and help persuade them to join.
The widespread
nature of the practice indicates the sexually charged world in which
contemporary college students live. Their favorite TV channels are
MTV, E!, Comedy Central, and ESPN. MTV churns out hours of programs
full of sexual content. (None of my students were surprised by the
Super Bowl halftime show when Justin Timberlake exposed one of Janet
Jackson's breasts.)
E! features the
shock-jock Howard Stern talking to an endless parade of nubile females,
including porn stars, trying to get them to disrobe (many do). Comedy
Central has The Man Show, which begins and ends with young women
jumping on trampolines to expose their undergarments. ESPN constantly
runs beer ads that feature women who appear always ready to party
with the college-age men in the ads.
A key component
of this undergraduate culture is alcohol. Studies by the Harvard
School of Public Health show that more than 60 percent of students
at many institutions, particularly those with big-time sports programs,
frequently binge drink. The high-water mark -- really high-alcohol
mark -- occurs during spring break, when more than a million students
gather at various beach resorts for nonstop binges. In this highly
charged atmosphere both on campuses and off, a great deal of sexual
activity takes place -- some of it unpleasant, especially for women,
and some of it criminal, particularly date rape.
Yet while
intercollegiate athletes belong, in part, to the student culture,
they also have their own. An athletics scholarship is essentially
a one-year contract for athletic performance, renewed or canceled
every July, usually at the behest of the coach. Therefore, the athletes
are vocational students, working their way through college at extremely
demanding jobs.
The athletics department
and the coaches control the players' lives: They arrange their room
and board, steer them to majors and courses, and structure their
time. The National Collegiate Athletic Association requires that
athletics departments keep time charts on their players, and the
coaches know where those players are most hours of the day. In addition,
although a major Division I-A football team like Colorado's has
as many as 125 players (85 on scholarship, the rest walk-ons), it
also has about 15 coaches, a similar number of trainers and medical-staff
members, and close to a dozen student managers.
Driving all of
those people and their activities is one goal: to win as many games
as possible. But the best coaches in the world cannot win without
recruiting blue-chip high-school athletes -- whose number, in any
year, is small. Thus, a university will charter a plane to bring
a prime football prospect to the campus, house him in a penthouse
suite, feed him the most expensive meals, and -- surprise -- provide
him with female companionship.
Many institutions
use undergraduate women for this purpose. Officially they discourage
sexual contact between the hostess and the recruit. But, given the
booze-and-sex undergraduate culture, unofficial contact is inevitable.
That some colleges also take recruits to strip bars and hire stripper
services, even escort services, is hardly a surprise -- except,
apparently, to coaches like Barnett, who has denied any knowledge
of the events alleged at Colorado.
Considering how
crucial successful recruiting is to a football program, and the
control that coaches have over their players, such denials strain
credibility. After each recruit's visit to a college, the female
hostesses and the host players are debriefed by coaches and other
personnel. Many questions are asked, and forms filled out. Joe Tiller,
head football coach at Purdue University, summed it up well in The
Indianapolis Star: "Whatever occurs on a recruiting trip, it will
get back to the coaching staff. It may not get back immediately,
but it will get back."
A football program
is a small world, run by the coaches out of the football complex.
A player spends most of his time in that complex, including his
mealtime. The idea is to build a cohesive team -- one for all, all
for one. That is why Barnett said to an alleged rape victim that
he "would back his player 100 percent if she took this forward in
the criminal process." His comment was instinctive, and he knew
that his players would want him to say it. He articulated the code
of the football culture.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth
Hoffman, Colorado's president, is a typical university administrator,
well aware of sexism and the law. Her condemnation of Barnett's
remark and her desire to give the victim a fair hearing represent
the third campus culture in play here. That culture is fundamentally
opposed to the undergraduate sexually charged ethos and to the macho
football code.
Colleges have strict
rules about gender rights and the treatment of women. In other professions,
a supervisor is allowed to date a subordinate -- corporate and professional
America do not encourage it, but it is rarely forbidden by formal
regulations. At most colleges, however, no faculty or staff member
is permitted to date a student. In that area, academe is in the
forefront of political correctness. Yet few enterprises in America
are less politically correct than students' party life and college
football programs. Hence the clash of cultures at Colorado and other
colleges.
But what are we
to make of Colorado administrators' assertions that they knew nothing
about the booze-and-sex parties for recruits before the police and
the press discovered them? Are their denials as questionable as
the coaches'? No, in fact, the administrators are probably telling
the truth. In my research, I've been struck by how little the average
administrator, particularly the average president, knows about undergraduate
life at his or her institution. Such administrators know even less
about the daily lives of athletes. The same is true for most faculty
members, who, at the large research universities that offer big-time
sports, are preoccupied with their scholarly careers.
Most people
in power at universities were not big sports fans as students; they
often had little awareness or understanding of athletics at their
institutions, or even of the collegiate culture. Many were highly
academic as undergraduates and did not participate much in collegiate
life; others went to small institutions without big-time sports.
But now, definitely
at Colorado and probably at many other institutions as well, presidents,
administrators, and faculty members can see the culture clash sparked
by the scandal in Boulder. They are upset, in part, because they
consider football players to be university representatives, and
when those players take recruits to strip bars, the university is,
in a sense, condoning that activity and its demeaning treatment
of women.
Moreover, university
authorities and the NCAA cannot as easily dismiss the recent recruiting
incidents as they did previous scandals. What occurred last year
at places like St. Bonaventure University, the University of Georgia,
and California State University at Fresno was, according to the
college-sports establishment, idiosyncratic -- a few rotten apples
in a large barrel. (In fact, all of the incidents were signs of
systemic failure.) But the Colorado scandal is a different matter:
Similar recruiting occurs all over the country; it is institutionalized
sexism; and it is not easily ignored.
Predictably,
the NCAA has set up a committee to investigate the problem. No doubt
it will add rules to its already huge handbook to try to control
the situation. But as long as colleges want their teams to win,
as long as they want to entice blue-chip athletes to sign with their
programs, as long as many of their undergraduates live in a highly
charged world of binge drinking and sexual activity, how can the
NCAA possibly prevent this kind of recruiting?
The NCAA
will try to spin the problem away, but the stakes are higher this
time. Many people at the University of Colorado and other colleges
who have been indifferent to big-time athletics up to now are outraged
by the recent incidents. They will not go quietly into the NCAA's
rah-rah night.
Murray Sperber
has written four books on college sports and college life, including
Beer & Circus: How
Big-Time College Sports is Crippling Undergraduate Education.
(Henry Holt, 2000).
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
April
20, 2004
Detainees' Challenge
Supreme Court Hears
Arguments in Guantanamo
by
Marcia Coyle, Washington bureau chief for
The National Law Journal.
GUANTANAMO
BAY, Cuba -- The Supreme Court entered the debate over which rights
should apply to those held in connection with the U.S. war on terror
Tuesday, hearing arguments in two cases questioning whether foreign
fighters captured abroad and held in a military camp in Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba should be able to challenge their imprisonments in the
American court system. Margaret Warner reviews the day in the high
court and key portions of the arguments with Marcia Coyle, Washington
bureau chief for the National Law Journal.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Friday
February 27, 2004
Ethics - Caught Any Lately?
by Howard E. Hobbs, Ph.D., Editor & Publisher
FRESNO STATE -- In my graduate school classes most USC Profs settled
on this truism - virtue is caught not taught. Of course
my university professors were begging the point. That is, virtue
and ethics are learned the hard way.
In fact, Universities seem to have a growing
number of budding ethicists in fields like bioethics, medical ethics,
legal ethics, computer ethics, and ethical realism. I've even been
accused of ethical skepticism.
I readily own-up to some well deserved
skepticism about the idea of requiring graduate students to memorize
meta-ethical paradigms. I admit my skepticism about the motives
of Ethics missionaries who seem to know less about honesty than
ethics or moral behavior or even the importance of maintaining an
informed level of self-interest.
One might want to know what to do when
adhering to moral principles jeopardize one's own economic well
being. In the face of these consequences moral knowledge becomes
more and more obscured by demands of self-interest
Ethics professors ought to consider
how ethical conflicts motivate professors in confronting their own
truisms and self-interest.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
~ Reprise ~
Sept 16, 1963
Downtown Fresno Urban Renewal
Challenge And Responsibility
By Howard Hobbs, Bulldog News Editor
FRESNO
STATE -- What to do with downtown Fresno? This
week in The Fresno Saving and Loan News (1963) a shocking
series of statements written by Fresno State College Social Science
professor, Karl Leonard Falk appeared on the front page, a portion
of which follow:
"WHAT
BOMBING DID to the cities of Western Europe in World War
II has to be done with bulldozers and dollars in the United States.
The destruction of old and crowded European cities was not a complete
calamity because it gave these cities an opportunity after the war
to rebuild in keeping with 20th Century needs.
For the first time in history America can
do the rebuilding in peacetime without undergoing the indiscriminate
destruction suffered by our west European friends, America has the
financial means -- if it has the imagination and foresight - to
renew the cities it has outgrown...This is not a time for sentiment
and nostalgia, nor is it a responsible attitude to say that the
jumbled and jangled life of our big cities is interesting and colorful
and exciting and couldn't be changed; as long as some people in
our "affluent society" are still living in cramped, undesirable
quarter and are working in factories and offices in an unnerving
environment under conditions that are unnecessarily bad, we need
renewal..."
It need not be be pointed out, but, Karl
Leonard Falk did not win the Nobel Prize or anything else for such
attention grabbers. Falk argued endlessly in class that despite
the war against Nazi Germany, the economic philosophy of the Nazis
and communists was becoming the guiding light for American and British
policy makers.
Falk would often remark,"Consider, for example,
the Nazi economic system. Who can argue that the American people
do not believe in and support most of its tenens? For example, how
many Americans today do not unequivocally support the following
planks of the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany, adopted
in Munich on February 24, 1920: "We ask that the government undertake
the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity
for employment and earning a living..."
[Editor's
Note: This week The Fresno Saving and Loan News, published
a column by Fresno State College Social Science professor, Karl
Leonard Falk. To download the printable page version click the title:
"Rebuilding Our Cities: Challenge And Responsibility." Prof.
Karl L. Falk, a Professor of Economics at State, is coincidentally
the current President of First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.
of Fresno. and a self-styled housing-urban renewal expert,
and chairman of the Fresno City Housing Authority. He told
reporters he is currently vice-chair of the Calif. Governor's
Commission on Housing Problems. Falk also said he is a past
president of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment
Officials of America. But before World War II, in 1938, Falk
was a graduate student at the Technische University of
Berlin where he narrowly escaped being charged with war crimes and
treason against the United States predicated upon his Nazi radio
broadcasts for the German Reich from 1937-1938 when he was employed
by the Nazi Ministry for Public Enlightenment & Propaganda.In
fact, The American student, Douglas Chandler, who took over for
young Karl Falk was subsequently arrested by US Agents in Berlin.
Back on US soil, Chandler was tried and found guilty of treason
against the United States and hanged. [see Federal
Reporter Second Series, Volume171 F.2d 1949.] Falk often
argued in his economics class lectures at Fresno State the economic
philosophy of the Nazis was becoming the guiding light
for American policy makers. On October 28, 1969, Karl Falk was appointed
as acting president of Fresno State. After only five days, Falk's
Gestapo Tactics began to show when he announced a massive realignment
of the college structure. Dale Burtner, the dean of the School of
Arts and Sciences, was reassigned and replaced with Phillip Walker.
Harold Walker, the executive vice president, was reassigned and
replaced with James Fikes. These reassignments once again caused
a rift in the campus community, resulting in even more protests.
Falk also instigated layoffs and curtailing of funds in the Experimental
College, the Ethnic Studies Program and the Educational Opportunities
Program. These changes resulted in peaceful as well as violent student
activism. Protests continued and began to be connected with larger
societal issues, including the Vietnam War. With the campus in an
uproar, the search began for a permanent administrator to relieve
Falk of his duties. On July 14, 1970, Norman Baxter was inaugurated
as the president of Fresno State College. His presidency was marked
by the cancellation of the La Raza Studies program and campus unrest
in response to his administrative policies. The Student Senate,
in a vote of nineteen to four, administered a vote of “no
confidence” in Baxter’s ability to run the school. ]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Feb. 3, 2004
Nationally Known Journalists
On Campus This Week
Staff Writers
FRESNO STATE -- On March
5th, two Pulitzer Prize winning journalists with combined experience
of more than 50 years in covering war, conflict and U.S. military
affairs will be the main speakers in March at a symposium at California
State University, Fresno focusing on media coverage of the conflict
in Iraq.
New York Times war correspondent Chris
Hedges and free-lance writer Seymour Hersh will speak at Fresno
State’s first Roger Tatarian Symposium in Journalism,
“Covering the War after the War,” that will examine
how well the media has covered the Iraq conflict since the fall
of Baghdad about a year ago and other related issues about the Iraq
war.
The free symposium will be on Friday, March
5, from 9 a.m. until noon at the Satellite Student Union on campus.
It is sponsored by the Department of Mass
Communication and Journalism and the Roger Tatarian Endowment for
Journalism. The endowment honors the late Fresno State journalism
professor, who was once editor-in-chief of United Press International.
The conference also will include Seymour
Hersh. He is one of the best investigative reporters on military
affairs. Hersh, a graduate of the University of Chicago, began his
career in 1959 as a police reporter for the City News Bureau in
Chicago. He later worked for United Press International in South
Dakota and The Associated Press in Chicago. In the early 1970s he
was a reporter in The New York Times Washington bureau. He has written
eight books, including The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon
White House, which won him the National Book Critics Circle award.
The symposium is open to the public.
[Editor's
Note: Additional information about conference registration will
be forthcoming or call Miller at (559) 278-2087. See updates at
www.FresnoStateNews.com.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
(Facsimile translation
from original unpublished 1938 paper in German Language)
August 12, 1938
National Socialist
Economic Measures
by Karl Leonard Falk, Student
Unter den Linden,Technishen
Universitat Berlin 1933-38
BERLIN -- The Nazi economic
policy in 1930-33 has been just to reduce the high unemployment
associated with the economic depression. This involved public works,
expansion of credit, easy monetary policy and manipulation of exchange
rates.
Generally, a centrally administered Hitler's
economy has little trouble eliminating unemployment because he can
create large public works projects and people are put to work regardless
of whether or not their productivity exceeds their wage cost. Germany
has already been successful in solving the unemployment problem.
The Hitler government reacted to the threat
of inflation by declaring a general price freeze in 1936. From that
action the Nazi Government was driven to expand the role of the
government in directing the economy and reducing the role played
by market forces. Although private property was not nationalized,
its use was more and more determined by the government rather than
the owners.
For an example, I point to the case of the
an individual leather which takes its production orders at the direction
of the Leather Control Office. This arrangement makes it possible
for the factory to get the hides and other supplies it needed to
produce leather.
The output of leather is according to the
dictates of the Leather Control Office. The Control Offices set
their directives through a process involving the collection of statistical
information by a Statistical Section. Then the Statistical Section
assembles all the important data on past production, equipment,
storage facilities and raw material requirements.
Next, the planning of production taking
into account the requirements of leather by other industries in
their plans; e.g. the needs of the Shoe Control Office for supplies
of leather. The available supply of hides limited the production
of leather. There had to be a balancing of supply and demand.
The result of the planning of all the control
offices was a sort of Balance Sheet. There was some effort at creating
some system for solving the planning, such as production being limited
by the narrowest bottleneck, but in practice the planning ended
up being simply scaling up past production and planning figures.
And the issuing of production orders to the individual factories.
Last, is checking up on compliance with the planning orders.
In practice the authorities of the control
offices often intervene and there is continual negotiation and political
battles as the users of products tried to use political influence
to improve their allocations. The prices made little economic sense
after Germany began war preparations.
So economic calculations using the official
prices were not particularly meaningful. For example, the profitability
of a product was of no significance in whether it should be produced
or not. Losses did not result in a factory ceasing production; the
control offices made sure that it got the raw materials and that
the workers got rations of necessities.
The Government establishes a priorities
list for allocating scarce resources. Activities associated with
consumer goods production is near the bottom of the list. If two
users wanted gasoline and one use of gasoline is for trucks to haul
raw materials to factories, well, the Government always gives the
available gasoline to the Army then the truckers cannot deliver
supplies to the factories and they shut down and eventually other
factories dependent upon them also shut down.
The problem with making production decisions
without reference to relevant prices is that the control offices
may dictate the production of goods which are of less value to the
economy than the opportunity costs of the resources that go into
their production. And because of authorities typically persecute
people for dealing in these markets.
Yet, the reality is that such markets are
essential for preventing a collapse of the new Germany economy.
Bibliography: Bruns, Paul (1937). Vom
Wesen und der Bedeutung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront: Ein Beitrag
zuihrer Würdigung als Wegbereiterin einer neuen deutschen Sozialordnung,
Leipzig: Joh. Moltzen; Falk, Karl Leonard (1938). The
Nazi German Economic Model.Unter den Linden, doctoral
dissertation abstract, Technishen Universitat Berlin.
[Editor’s Note: Karl Leonard Falk
is a Foreign Language major attending Stanford University, Palo
Alto Calif. Although he has taken no formal coursework in Economics
and has no formal training in Social Science, he claims to have
become an expert of sorts on the subject through his readings of
articles in German newspapers on “Hitler’s National
Socialist Miracle” from the early 1930’s. He told reporters
he decided to obtain a student visa for travel to Germany's Technische
Universitat in Berlin where he might more closely study Hitler’s
Nazi economics. A central element of the Falk's
course of study required him to identify and articulate the various
modes of argumentation, persuasion, rhetoric, and debate used by
Nazi-professors in Course Content. For example a central element
of the course content required young Falk to identify and articulate
the various modes of argumentation, persuasion, rhetoric, and debate
used by German university scholars in their diaries, correspondence,
ideological propaganda essays and scholarly ethical and political
treatises. For example, Falk learned how to instantly identify the
modes of argumentation and rhetoric used in Nazi political ideological
and propaganda essays, such as Hitler’s Mein Kampf
and Julius Streicker’s newspaper Der Strumer, as
well as in documented statements of numerous members of the Einsatzgruppen
(mobile killing units of the SS) as recorded in the book, Good
Old Days. The course content examined the mode of argumentation
expressed in Hitler’s Mein Kampf in conjunction with
the severe economic and political crises of the Weimar Republic
in the 1920s and Germany’s compliance with the Versailles
Treaty of 1919. In addition, the student Karl Leonard Falk was required
to communicate effectively his positions and arguments through a
variety of oral and written assignments. A major goal and critical
element of that course was to encourage him to develop lucid arguments,
logical argumentation skills and the ability to present positions
and arguments through a variety of communicative formats. On completion
of the Nazi curricula in 1937 , Karl Leonard von Falk submitted
a slim essay of a mere 108 pages as a dissertation, entitled "Grundsatz
und Probleme der americanischen Tagespresse." For this and
other services he was awarded a Ph.D. in Nazi Journalism by Technische
Universtat in Berlin. The rest is a sad chapter in Fresno State
history.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 29, 2004
Doom at Fresno State
Will It Ruin Hard-Drives?
By Amy Williams, Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Suppose
Norton AntiVirus has detected an infected email, and you have chosen
to quarantine the file. You now find that your Netscape or Outlook
Express Inbox has been quarantined. After restoring the Inbox from
quarantine, it no longer contains your original email. What now?
The University support services staff manager,
Chip Hancock' said late Wednesday that Fresno State University computer
hard drives had been inundated by the troublesome virus known as
"My Doom", "Mimail.R" or "Novarg".
According to the Hancock, "cleverly designed"
e-mails are being received in campus computer hard drives. The bogus
e-mail appears to be from a known address but which is a cleverly
disguised e-mail bomb attachment.
The sneak attacks are flooding computer
servers and causing shutdowns all over the internet since yesterday
when users began attempting to open the infected e-mail.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 28, 2004
Downtown Mall, Futuristic City Hall
New Valley Times, Who Needs 'em?
By Edward Davidian, Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Fresno's
innovative downtown mall, built in the 1960s, flourished, declined
and now struggles. Originally, it was the centerpiece of a reborn
downtown retail area, complete with fountains, streams and water-spouting
sculptures. It helped Fresno become an All-American City later in
the 1960s. Then it was all over.
Its early promise was undone by the City
Council that created it. The County and City Council action approving
Fresno's City Limits move northward and the inevitable expansion
that resulted brought a retail exodus from downtown.
By century's end, nearly a decade of wrangling
over a downtown stadium proposed for just west of the mall hadn't
produced any more than a pile of dirt and a lot of ill will, although
there is much talk about sprucing up the mall and redeveloping other
parts of downtown.
Some of those early optimistic City Council decisions
to build the mall were made in a City Hall as early as 1941. But
it took the City Council until 1958 build it. By then it was too
late and downtown shopping was already a dead-letter even before
construction was beguin. Later, talk of a lake instead of streets
and construction of a futuristic design for City Hall failed to
bring back the people and the stores. Magnificent shopping at River
Park on the bluffs overlooking the San Joaquin River finished off
downtown Fresno. Even those most sympathetic to the plight of West
Fresno's ghetto are not persuaded that simply reviving the social
programs dismantled in the last decade or so will solve Downtown
or West Fresno's problems.
Residential and class inequalities appear
to be as great as inequalities in financial and human capital that
present fundamental racial isolation issues, coupled with socially
inherited differences in community networks and norms, means that
Downtown Fresno, even in the long run, is not a competitor for Rive
Park dollars.
In tackling the ills of Downtown Fresno,
investments in physical capital, financial capital, human capital,
and social capital are complementary, not competing alternatives.
Investments in jobs and education, for example, will be more effective
if they are coupled with reinvigoration of community associations
than the publishing of Mock news in the New Valley Times.
If Fresno State administrators want to
help solve Fresno's socio-economic ills, they might think of providing
job banks and use their reputational capital to vouch for Downtown
Fresno's street commuity members who may be ex-convicts, former
drug addicts, or high school dropouts.
More fundamentally, the importance of social
capital for Downtown Fresno's domestic agenda must not limited to
minority communities. Many people today are concerned about revitalizing
Fresno through public discussion of such procedural issues as largely
unnoticed social changes.
Classic liberal social policy emphasizes
social capital that might be recaptured by ill-advised strategies
like the New Valley Times that suddenly appeared on front-porches
on Tuesday. This emphasis is misplaced and results in wasted social
capital and ill-will. Instead we must focus on community development,
allowing space for both politics and economics. Government policies,
whatever their intended effects, should be vetted for their indirect
effects on social capital. If, as some suspect, social capital is
fostered more by home ownership than by public or private tenancy,
then we should design housing policy accordingly. The fate of the
Fulton Mall is a signed and sealed dead-letter.
Similarly, Social capital is not a substitute
for effective public policy but rather a prerequisite for it and,
in part, a consequence of it. Social capital works through and with
individuals and markets, not in place of them. Wise policy can encourage
social capital formation, and social capital itself enhances the
effectiveness of government action. The planning mistakes of fifty
years ago still divide the community organizations.
We have buried that dead horse generations
ago. Fresno City Hall government has often promoted investments
in social capital, and it must renew that effort now. In view
of the passage of time, it is unsettling to find that Fresno State
students of social capital have only just begun to address some
of the most important questions that this approach to public affairs
suggests. Some like, "What kinds of civic engagement seem most
likely to foster economic growth or community effectiveness?"
and "What strategies for rebuilding social capital are most
promising?"
The community also needs to ask about the
negative effects of social capital, for like human and physical
capital, social capital can be put to bad purposes as we have seen
this very day. We have not always reckoned with the indirect social
costs of City planning and related policy strategies, but we were
often right to be worried about the power of the press, even such
as the mock news page delivered to our homes earlier today.
Recognizing the importance of social capital in
sustaining community life does not exempt us from the need to worry
about who is inside and who benefits from the mock newspaper. And
who is outside and does not. Some forms of social capital can impair
individual liberties, as critics of free press should know.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 26, 2004
Intellectual Diversity:
An Endangered Species
on America’s College Campus
Anthony Dick, Student, University
of Virginia
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- When
I came to college three years ago, I expected to find an environment
firmly devoted to free inquiry and the open competition of ideas.
In order for such an atmosphere to be sustained, however, two
core principles of liberal education must hold strong.
First, universities must respect the
freedom of every individual to express any idea or opinion without
fear of punishment. Second, universities must allow all ideas
to compete on an equal footing, without using institutional power
to privilege certain viewpoints above others. At University of
Virginia [UVA] both of these principles
have eroded as the University has strayed from strict liberal
arts education and moved toward a more politicized function.
Judging from my experience over the last
three years, many in the UVA community view a university education
not as an end in itself, but merely as a means to achieving some
higher political goal. This “higher goal” manifests itself in
various causes such as the rectifying of historical injustices,
the eradication of social inequalities, or the alleviation of
racial or socioeconomic oppression. It is a common view among
many that the equal competition of ideas and the equal right to
free expression together serve only to perpetuate various prejudices
and injustices that linger from our less-than-perfect past. From
this premise, they argue that certain viewpoints should be either
curtailed or privileged in a deliberate manner, with a progressive
aim in mind.
These advocates of politicized education
have succeeded to some degree in influencing the state of affairs
at UVA. As they have succeeded, liberal arts education has suffered.
On the one hand, they have propagated policies that stifle the
expression of certain viewpoints. On the other hand, they have
worked to establish mandates and requirements privileging certain
favored opinions above all others. With the selective application
of administrative power both to restrict some ideas and favor
others, the marketplace of ideas has lost balance. In many controversial
fields of discussion at UVA, the competition of opposing views
has become slanted in one particular direction, and the situation
threatens to become much worse.
Earlier this semester, a group of concerned
students and I founded the Individual Rights Coalition (IRC) at
UVA. We also launched a website, www.freeuva.com.
Our motivation stems from our belief in the enduring value of
liberal arts education. Following in the tradition of Thomas Jefferson,
the father of UVA, we believe that our university should treat
education as an apolitical end in itself, and that social progress
is best assured when the realm of ideas is kept as free as possible
from interference at the hands of authority.
Further, we hold that the best way to
ward off such authoritarian interference is to foster an equal
respect for the individual rights of all people in all circumstances.
We are a truly non-partisan group, with members on all sides of
the traditional left-right political divide. I was raised in a
liberal family, I am a registered Democrat in the state of Virginia,
and I maintain liberal views on many political issues. Although
each of us in the IRC has a different vision of the ideal society,
none of us is willing to sacrifice liberal arts education in an
effort to see our vision realized.
In UVA’s “Discriminatory Harassment Policy”
printed in this year’s Undergraduate Record, students are warned
against engaging in any type of expression that “unreasonably
interferes with a person's work or academic performance or participation
in University activities, or creates a working or learning environment
that a reasonable person would find threatening or intimidating.”
The policy then proceeds to list examples of expressions for which
students should be “reported for review.” These examples include:
“Directing racial or ethnic slurs at someone,” “Telling
persons they are too old to understand new technology,” and
“ridiculing a person's religious beliefs.”
At best, these examples imply a threat
of punishment for engaging in constitutionally protected expression.
But even worse, they seem to lend definition to the Administration’s
conception of “unreasonable interference.” If these examples could
be construed to unreasonably interfere with another person’s educational
pursuits, then a wide range of other offensive speech becomes
threatened. As a result, some students I know at UVA are unsure
about exactly what they can write or say without having to fear
punishment. Would a religious satire in the tradition of Mark
Twain count as “ridiculing a person’s religious beliefs?”
Do “racial or ethnic slurs” include passionate arguments that
offend anyone of another race? The simple fact that these questions
need to be asked illustrates the chilling effect of a speech code
that is both vague and potentially overbroad.
Similar problems arise from UVA’s Sexual
Harassment Policy, which warns against sex-related expressions
that create an “offensive working or learning environment.” In
its discussion of sexual harassment, UVA’s Office of Equal Opportunity
Programs lists some “examples of problematic behavior.” These
include “jokes of a sexual nature,” “suggestive comments about
physical attributes or sexual experience,” “sexually suggestive
emails,” and “sexual comments that bear no legitimate relationship
to the subject matter of a course.”
As a columnist with UVA’s student newspaper,
I often have wondered how the University’s Discriminatory Harassment
Policy and Sexual Harassment Policy have been applied in the past.
Last year, I wrote to University officials on three separate occasions
to try to obtain records of past cases that have been prosecuted
under the Policies. At first, I received a reply that the documents
I sought were considered “education records” under the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act. Therefore, "even if they were
found, they would ultimately have to be withheld from disclosure
because of federal law." Eventually, the University Judiciary
Committee (UJC) offered to search their records and release the
number of cases prosecuted under the Policies, as long as I would
pay ten dollars per hour for their research. Because this would
have amounted to hundreds of dollars that I did not have, and
because this paltry information would have told me nothing about
the type of speech to which the Policies were applied, I did not
accept the offer.
UVA’s vague Sexual and Discriminatory
Harassment Policies, along with the University’s unwillingness
to release details about how these policies have been applied,
create an environment where the protection of free expression
is uncertain. According to the Policies, and especially in light
of the provided examples, it seems that some speech can be punished
simply for being “offensive.” The result of this uncertainty is
largely intangible, as some UVA students simply choose to silence
themselves rather than risk punishment for their potentially “offensive”
views. Not surprisingly, the types of views that are silenced
in this way are usually those that are widely and vocally disfavored
by both the majority of the UVA community and by the UVA Administration.
At Thomas Jefferson’s University, of all places, this unnatural
conformity of opinion bespeaks a sad state of affairs.
The politicization of UVA is most evident
in the University’s recent efforts to establish a mandatory “diversity
training program.” This program centers on topics such as race,
ethnicity, gender, identity, and other controversial social issues.
One UVA administrator has described its purpose to me as “instilling
community values” in students. The impetus for this “training”
draws strength from the idea that incoming UVA students are burdened
with certain prejudices and misunderstandings regarding social
issues, and that they must be “trained” to abandon these prejudices.
This function of the University falls far outside of its traditional
role of providing a liberal arts education, and extends into the
realm of bringing about directed social change.
At the beginning of the summer in 2003,
the Charlottesville Daily Progress and The Cavalier Daily (the
UVA student newspaper) reported that the UVA Administration had
mandated an online "diversity training" program to be imposed
upon undergraduates at the University. In a June 12 news story,
one administrator described the mandatory program: "The purpose
of the online diversity training system is to provide entering
students with the opportunity to gain insights into the way their
own cultural, ethnic or racial expectations and experiences influence
their interaction with other students, faculty and staff from
different backgrounds with whom they come into contact as members
of the University community."
In the same news story, a member of the
faculty steering committee for the mandatory program stated that
the training was created to get students "to confront their own
prejudices and areas of misunderstanding" with regard to diversity-related
topics. From my personal conversations with administrators and
media reports, the planned method of enforcing this requirement
is to block students from registering for classes until they complete
the training—making it mandatory in the strictest sense of the
word. Thus, with the backing of administrative power to force
people to attend them, whatever views are included in this particular
mandatory training program will necessarily be privileged over
competing views.
Since the co-founding of the IRC at UVA,
administrators fortunately have distanced themselves somewhat
from the idea of mandatory diversity training. This is due largely
to the strong student support that the IRC has garnered, as well
as the IRC’s articulation of the inadvisability of using administrative
power to privilege certain controversial views over others. Issues
pertaining to diversity are far too fluid and complex for the
Administration to act as if there is an objective truth about
them that students can be “trained” to understand. However, top
administrators still maintain that such training is under serious
consideration at UVA, and plans for the implementation of this
program are still under way. Most importantly, the spirit of support
for such a program remains strong among many in the UVA community
who want to abandon the University’s strict focus on liberal arts
education in favor of a more extensive political function.
Much of the IRC’s opposition to mandatory
diversity training at UVA comes from our knowledge of how similar
diversity training programs have been implemented at other colleges
and universities. In an invasive exercise at Swarthmore College
in 1998, students were lined up in their dormitories according
to their skin color, from lightest to darkest, and asked to speak
about their feelings regarding their place in line. In Skin Deep,
a nationally distributed diversity training film, students are
summarily informed, “intolerance has once again become a way of
life” on America’s campuses. The movie’s “study guide” goes on
to assert dogmatically the necessary and proper role of racial
preferences in higher education, the undeniable problem of white
privilege, and the need for students to fight against the “internalized
oppression” that lurks within each of them.
In another widely used training film
titled Blue Eyed, a diversity trainer by the name of Jane Elliott
spends a day abusing and ridiculing a group of blue-eyed men and
women in order to teach viewers a lesson about the nature of oppression
and the plight of racial minorities in American society. She forces
them to sit on the floor, yells at them incessantly, and reminds
them, “You have no power, absolutely no power… quit trying.” After
viciously pushing one sullen blue-eyed individual to the brink
of tears, Elliott announces, “what I just did to him today Newt
Gingrich is doing to you every day... and you are submitting to
that, submitting to oppression.” To get her message across more
clearly, she proclaims, “I'm only doing this for one day to little
white children. Society does this to children of color every day.”
As a prescription for this supposed problem, the written guide
accompanying the movie baldly states, “It is not enough for white
people to stop abusing people of color. All U.S. people need a
personal vision for ending racism and other oppressive ideologies
within themselves.” The point of the film is clear: America is
an unbearably racist society, dominated by sinister forces of
oppression that can only be overcome by sweeping institutional
changes. Instead of being treated as viable topics for free debate,
claims like these are now the regular subject of “training” sessions
at universities across the country.
At UVA, administrators themselves typically
do not take the initiative to conceive and implement illiberal
policies and programs. Rather, they often implement such programs
under significant pressure from vocal student groups who champion
so-called progressive causes. UVA administrators by and large
constitute an extremely risk-averse and reactive body. They are
careful to avoid criticism at almost any expense, as they have
their own careers to look after. Thus, on any given issue, they
have proven themselves with great reliability to take whichever
side seems least likely to generate negative publicity for them.
When high-profile incidents occur relating to racial or ethnic
insensitivity, administrators are harshly accused of inaction
and failure to provide a welcoming community for minority students.
In order to deflect such criticism, they readily accede to radical
demands from student groups offering drastic solutions to the
University’s alleged problems. As a result, administrators can
be trusted to defend individual rights and academic integrity
only to the extent that they perceive such defense will grant
them favor in the eyes of the University community and of society
at large.
Further, from my experience, the overwhelming
majority of administrators at UVA could be described as either
left or far left on the political spectrum. Regardless of the
reason for this, it translates simply into a greater danger of
administrative power being used for partisan ends. This is not
due to some innate ambition for power inherent in their political
views—the same problem would arise under a solidly conservative
administration. The problem is simply that when administrators
all think in roughly the same way about certain political issues,
they seem less likely to recognize certain programs as wrongly
viewpoint-discriminatory, and more likely to view such efforts
simply as instruments of social justice and positive change.
Thus, two relevant features describe
administrators at UVA: First, they are highly susceptible to pressure
from groups who pose a legitimate threat of career-damaging criticism.
And second, they are somewhat pre-disposed to sympathize with
requests for administrative action on behalf of a particular political
ideology.
At UVA, “diversity” is the focus of an
amazing amount of attention. All too often, though, it is discussed
only in terms of the superficial characteristics of students and
faculty. Differences in race, ethnicity, and gender are praised
and sought after with great fervor, but significantly less attention
is given to the intellectual diversity of the University community.
This problem is exacerbated by the efforts of some who seek to
shape the University into a vehicle for social change as opposed
to an impartial guardian of the liberal arts. To these people,
vibrant intellectual diversity is not so much a boon to the development
of the mind as it is an obstacle to the achievement of political
ends.
If liberal arts education is to be preserved
at UVA, freedom of speech and freedom of thought must be firmly
secured. Students and faculty must feel confident in their ability
to enjoy the full protection of their free speech rights as accorded
by the First Amendment of the Constitution. The University Administration
must also refrain from implementing any form of mandatory “training”
that seeks to direct or control students’ thinking on controversial
social issues. For higher education to maintain its integrity,
it must be treated not as a means to any political end, but as
an invaluable end in and of itself.
[Editor's Note:
Founded in 1890, The Cavalier Daily is the independent
daily newspaper of the University of Virginia. With a printed
circulation of 10,000 as well as a worldwide online version, the
paper serves the University community's students, faculty and
alumni alike. The diverse staff of more than 100 students has
earned recent awards for outstanding newswriting, photography,
and overall layout. The Cavalier Daily has consistently been ranked
a four star newspaper by the American Collegiate Press. Anthony
Dick a student at University of Virginia appeared as a witness
before the full US Senate Committee Hearings on Health Education
Labor & Pensioins October 29, 2003. The Congressional
Committee on Labor and Human Resources refers all proposed legislation,
messages, petitions, memorials, and other matters relating to
education, labor, health, and public welfare.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Saturday January 24, 2004
Govenor's Budget Scales Back
CSU System by $240 Million
by Edward Davidian, Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger of California proposed more spending cuts for the
state's public universities and recommended double-digit percentage
increases in tuition in his first state budget plan, released this
month.
The proposed cuts are part of the governor's
plan to deal with a projected state budget deficit of $14-billion
in the 2004-5 fiscal year.
Specifically, Mr. Schwarzenegger's budget
would cut state funds for the University of California by 8 percent,
or $372-million, and scale back spending on programs at California
State University by 9 percent, or $240-million. Funds for the state's
108 public two-year institutions would increase by $211-million,
or 4.4 percent.
Under the governor's plan, increases in
tuition would make up for some of the cuts at universities and would
increase the money available for community colleges. Mr. Schwarzenegger,
a Republican, proposed raising tuition for in-state undergraduates
at the University of California and California State University
systems by 10 percent in the 2004-5 academic year.
The jump in rates would be even greater
for out-of-state undergraduates and graduate students in the two
public-university systems. Mr. Schwarzenegger recommended increasing
tuition by 20 percent for nonresidents in undergraduate programs
and by up to 40 percent for graduate students.
At community colleges, the governor called
for increasing rates by 44 percent, to $26 per credit hour. Tuition
for students at two-year institutions who already hold bachelor's
or higher degrees would increase even more, to $50 per credit hour,
under Mr. Schwarzenegger's budget. All students now pay $18 per
credit hour, which represented a 64-percent increase over the previous
academic year.
Even as he urged tuition increases, Mr.
Schwarzenegger called for a more predictable tuition policy, to
limit the wide variance in rate increases over the state's good
and bad economic times. For example, while in-state students at
public universities saw a 30-percent jump in tuition rates at the
beginning of the current academic year, students at California's
public institutions during the economic boom of the late 1990s enjoyed
a freeze, and then a 10-percent cut, in tuition rates.
Mr. Schwarzenegger said that tuition should
not rise by more than 10 percent each year for California residents
who are undergraduates at the state's public universities, and that
the tuition rates should be tied to the rate of growth of per-capita
personal income in California.
"We must end the boom-and-bust cycle
of widely fluctuating fees with a predictable, capped-fee policy
for college students and their parents," the governor said
during his State of the State address.
In his budget plan, the governor also proposed
reducing the current requirement that universities set aside one-third
of revenues from tuition increases for financial aid. Citing
the state's budget crunch, Mr. Schwarzenegger is recommending that
institutions instead devote only 20 percent to student aid, so that
they could use more of the revenues to help absorb cuts in state
funds.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Wednesday January 21, 2004
Budget Prospects at Fresno State
Amy Wiliams, Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE
-- California State University, Fresno President John D. Welty informed
the faculty and staff today that a mid-year reduction in the current
state budget and Gov. Schwarzenegger’s proposed budget for this
year 2004 and next (2005) will require the university to face “painful
decisions” as it copes with the state fiscal crisis.
In his annual Spring Assembly address,
Welty said the Fresno State’s steps over the last several years
to prepare for belt-tightening have served it well. “But,” he added,
“this year will require hard work, creativity and maximum accountability
from all of us.”
On a positive note, Welty pointed with
pride to the new Science II building under construction and scheduled
for occupancy in January 2005.
And he highlighted the importance of passage
of Proposition 55 on the March ballot. That statewide bond issue
includes $91 million for expansion and renovation of the Madden
Library at Fresno State.
Looking at 2004-05, the situation is serious,
Welty said. Based on Gov. Schwarzenegger’s proposal to cut $250
million or 9 percent from the California State University system,
Fresno State would have to reduce its base budget in 2004-05 by
$12 million. That would come after a 13 percent reduction last year,
defrayed in part by increased student fees.
The Governor’s proposal also would mean
Fresno State would serve 1,500 fewer students, and students who
do attend would pay 10 percent (undergraduate) or 40 percent (graduate
students) more. If enacted, that fee increase would be on top of
two hikes last year that pushed fees up 30 percent.
Though the situation may change as the
Governor’s proposed budget moves through the Legislature toward
its final form, planning must start immediately, Welty said. He
said he has instructed each school, college and division at Fresno
State to prepare a plan to meet the reductions with 7.5 cutbacks.
The plans will be reviewed by the University budget committee and
implemented in April.
“We will continue our efforts to avoid
laying off employees,” Welty said. “However, given the severity
of the reductions we face, I cannot promise you at this time that
layoffs will not be necessary.”
Welty also discussed the importance of
the university’s just-started multi-year “Comprehensive Campaign”
to raise millions for academic and other uses on the campus.
Welty started his speech by paying tribute
to “our colleague and dear friend” President Harold H. Haak, who
died Dec. 26. He praised Haak as a compassionate and strong leader
who had “enormous impact on higher education in Central California.”
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Tuesday January 20, 2004
Writers Write & The Writing They Do!
by Howard Hobbs PhD, Editor & Publisher
FRESNO STATE
-- Writers write what they do and for some, it is both exhilarating
and arduous. Writers explain why they write one way. The mind that
writes is also the brain that writes. And the existence of brain
states that affect our creativity raises questions that make us
uneasy.
Some social scientists believe that enterprises
as diverse as scientific discovery, literature, dancing, and successful
business decisions should not all be lumped under the single concept
of creativity.
Howard Gardner, for instance, has argued
that different intelligences are needed for different domains such
as language and mathematics, and that creativity in one domain does
not necessarily extend into another.
Researchers on creativity have begun to
combine information from a number of different disciplines, and
argue persuasively that it is such an important phenomenon that
we cannot afford not to study it.
Most researchers agree that a useful definition
of creative work is that it includes a combination of novelty and
value. The definition of creative work as novel and valuable also
captures the societal aspect of what gets called creative work.
Creativity is not the property of a work
in isolation: Novelty and value have to be defined in relation to
a social context. Sometimes the social context is not clear, however.
The role of social context in determining
value also underlies the process whereby the geniuses of one generation
are hacks the next, while people dismissed as mad are rehabilitated
as geniuses. Someone who is fascinated by language attends to details
and to the overall texture of a writing project more than he will
if he is writing simply to satisfy the public.
People who know how to write, seem to want
desperately to write may have the urge to write as a secondary drive
that grows out of a more fundamental onr, the drive to communicate.
Recent researchers propose that communicating is something hardwired
into us, that we have, a language instinct.
Linguists tend to focus on semantics and
sentences as vehicles that transmit a logical proposition. Llinguists
ten to argue that the emotional aspect of language, transmitted
as much by tone as by words, does not separate it from primitive
nonlinguistic gestures.
If language and writing grow out of a biological
system for attempting to fill needs, then the idea of self-expression
can teach the us more about ourelves. Many creative writers have
been quite capable of powerfully emotive writing yet lack insight
into the internal conflicts that drive their sense of relief by
the act of writing.
A recent Social Science study by Alice Brand
provides evidence that writing, at least on personally chosen subjects,
has measurable mood effects. In both students and professional writers,
the act of writing both intensified positive emotions and blunted
negative ones.
Brand's findings were consistent with what
has been described by many writers. For example, Ernest Hemingway
once told reporters: "When I don't write, I feel like shit. And
for many, writing is what they are meant to do."
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
~Reprise~
Friday March 12, 1943
A WESTERN STAR
Shines Bright For America Tonight
Stephen Vincent. Benet
FRESNO STATE -- In the
spirit and beginnings of America, there is an essence of what America
is and the sure knowledge of what it will be.
In 1934 I began writing a long narrative
poem about the western migration of peoples and more specifically
the pioneers, first as they came to America and then as they spread
out through America toward the West.
It was to be a long poem - of three, four
or possibly five books. I worked on this for some years, put it
aside while I wrote other things, and took it up again later on.
When the war came, I put it aside to do
pieces on the war, speeches on the radio broadcasts and other things.
A few months ago I put into shape, for possible publication, my
book Western Star which begins..."Americans are always
moving on. It is an old Spanish custom gone astray, a
sort of English fever, I believe, or just a mere desire to take
French leave, I couldn't say. But when the whistle blows, they go
away, somtimes there never was a whistle blown, but they don't care,
for they can blow their own whistles of willow stick and rabbit
bone, a dozen tunes but only one refrain...these are the notes they
hear..."
[Editor's
Note: On Friday March 12, 1943, Stephen Vincent Benet died at his
writing desk. Next to him on his desk were pencilled papers, notes
for his new book Western Star on top of which was this
message --"Now for my country that it still may live, all
that I have, all that I am I'll give. It is not much beside the
gift of the brave, and yet accept it since tis all I have."
Binet was born July 22, 1898, in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, into a
military family. His father had a wide appreciation for literature,
and Benet's siblings, William Rose and Laura, also becmae writers.
Benet attended Yale University where he published two collections
of poetry. His studies were interrupted by a year of civilian military
service; he worked as a cipher-clerk in the same department as James
Thurber. He graduated from Yale in 1919, submitting his third volume
of poems in place of a thesis. He published his first novel The
Beginning of Wisdom in 1921. Benet was successful in many different
literary forms, which included novels, short stories, screenplays,
radio broadcasts. His most famous poem Western Star (Farrar
& Rinehart Inc. New York - 1943) based on American history,
won him the Pulitzer Prize. At the age of 44, Benét
suffered a heart attack and died , in New York City.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Monday January 19, 2004
Space Budget
Big as all Outdoors!
Stanley Kurtz, Contributor
FRESNO STATE -- It’s too early to form a
definitive opinion on the president’s plans for space. Broadly speaking,
I support the president’s initiative. Nonetheless, there are concerns.
Missions to the Moon and Mars are far into the future.
That means the real outcome of this plan
is in doubt. For the program to bear fruit, we’d need to sustain
a commitment far beyond president Bush’s term in office, even if
he’s reelected. In the current political and budgetary climate,
serious spending increases are not workable.
So most of the money will come out of the
retirement of the shuttle program. That makes sense, since the shuttle
is of limited use. But I worry that important scientific projects,
like astronomical observation satellites, may be curtailed to pay
for the Moon launch.
Actually, I think the president has handled
this issue well. I’m increasingly convinced that the real problem
here is not with our national willingness to sustain a great project,
or even with the choice between government or private funding of
space ventures.
The real problem here is the challenge of
space itself. Space is not like the American West. It is much more
physically challenging, relative to our current level of technology.
Given the history of failed projects and cost overruns, it becomes
increasingly clear that space may prove too expensive to conquer
at our current (or even near-term future) technical level.
Since we can’t know this with certainty,
it makes sense to devise a program for the long term that may or
may not be sustained, depending on how NASA produces. But again,
the more I look into this, the more daunting it seems. Consider
the Op Ed by Paul Davies in today’s New York Times (which Dennis
Powell notes in his NRO piece).
It proposes leaving astronauts to die on
Mars as a cost effective way to explore the planet. Mars is looking
a whole lot more like Mt. Everest than like California every day.
But let’s not end on too pessimistic a note. Rand Simberg has put
up a thoughtful response to my skeptical post of yesterday.
I get more skeptical every day, but Simberg
is still the man to go to for intelligent and creative ideas on
how to conquer space. For all my doubts, I’d like him to succeed.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 16, 2004
Casino Towns Linked
to Higher Crime Rate
By Lee Shearer
Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Communities
with casino gambling have higher crime rates than communities that
don't have casinos, according to researchers at the universities
of Georgia and Illinois.
There was no increase in murder rates, said UGA
economics professor David Mustard, who co-authored the as-yet unpublished
paper with economist Earl L. Grinols of the University of Illinois
and Illinois graduate student Cynthia Hunt Dilley.
But six other felony crimes did increase,
Mustard said: aggravated assault, rape, burglary, auto theft, larceny
and forcible robbery. Auto theft showed the sharpest increase --
30 percent higher in counties with casinos -- followed by robbery,
at 20 percent, according to the study.
Overall, casinos push up the crime rate
by nearly 8 percent, the study concludes. The researchers timed
the release of their study to coincide with the final report of
the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, which is expected
today to propose steps to halt the spread of gambling.
The higher crime rates don't show up right
away, but tended to appear in the third year after a casino opened
-- perhaps because it takes chronic gamblers that long to exhaust
their resources, Grinols suggested. About 2 percent to 5 percent
of the gamblers in casino areas can be classified as ''pathological''
or ''problem'' gamblers, according to Grinols.
Earlier studies have shown conflicting results
-- that crime stayed the same, increased or even decreased after
casinos come in, Mustard said, and some experts have even argued
that casinos cause crime to go down because they increase employment
in an area.
But those studies were limited by a small
time frame or a small area of geographical study, he said. ''What
makes our study unique is that it's the most exhaustive study on
the subject,'' Mustard said.
The researchers included census data from
every county in the United States and looked at crime data over
a 20-year period beginning in 1977. They also introduced statistical
control factors to account for 50 variables that might affect crime
rates, including things like the age of the population in the area,
income levels, race and population growth.
Nationally, crime rates have been steadily
decreasing in the 1990s after steady increases in the 1970s and
1980s. The number of counties with casinos has increased from 14
in 1977, all in Nevada, to 167 in 1996.
According to the national gambling commission,
total legal wagers have grown to about $600 billion a year in the
United States -- more than is spent by Americans on cars or groceries.
And the poor bet more, according to the commission.
According to the commission report, gamblers
with household incomes $10,000 a year wager three times more money
than those with household incomes exceeding $50,000 a year.
Nationally, casino revenues were $26.3 billion
in 1997, the commission says. But the increased crime came at a
cost of some $12.1 billion annually -- about $63 for every adult
American, according to the researchers.
The point, said Mustard, is that ''What
you want to do is evaluate the costs and benefits of the casinos.
Crime is one of the costs, and you want to look at all the costs
and all the benefits,'' he said. Mustard pointed out that the study
was unfunded -- that the researchers took no money from either pro-
or anti-gambling sources.
[Editor's Note: Go to Yosemite
News for latest local area casino up-dates. And for pro-con
positions see Casino
Economics.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 15, 2004
The Fresno Bee high profile CEO
and his no layoff policy is a fresh
alternative to typical corporate journalism!
by Susan Paterno
FRESNO STATE -- Within
seconds after we meet, Gary Pruitt is apologizing profusely, digging
his hands deep into the pockets of his blue jeans and confessing
to a misunderstanding between him and his secretary that had him
body surfing the day before instead of sitting down for an interview.
Pruitt, the multimillionaire wunderkind CEO of the McClatchy Co.,
had come from the company's Sacramento headquarters to Orange County's
$500-a-night Ritz Carlton beachfront resort to preside over a retreat
for publishers and editors of his 11 dailies, coincidentally arriving
a few weeks after the Wall Street Journal named his company as a
candidate to buy the Orange County Register and its billion-dollar
parent company, Freedom Communications Inc.
Pruitt presented himself at the Ritz as
he often does, a modern Candide, always positive, always on message,
always looking as though he stepped from the pages of a Ralph Lauren
catalog, running a company as trim and fit and athletic as he is.
He has a smile that probably broke a hundred hearts in high school
and an endearing goofy charm, stumbling over Hegel and rattling
off Rolling Stone lyrics in the same conversation, likening his
Wall Street strategy to a Lenny Kravitz tune for analysts, talking
as guilelessly about journalism as he does about redecorating his
office from the dark wood paneling of the previous regime to a streamlined
modern gray and blue, with matching Expressionist paintings and
a light fixture that his mentor and predecessor Erwin Potts told
him looks vaguely pornographic.
At 46, Pruitt represents the future of
journalism, a new game whose rules have changed considerably from
the '70s and '80s, when C.K. McClatchy led a company so aggressive
it had more than a dozen libel suits pending against it. Back then,
McClatchy paid some of the best salaries in the business and boasted
a stable of newspapers with a "raw, heartfelt sense of belonging
to a cause," as the company's octogenarian namesake--and its
journalistic conscience--Jim McClatchy put it recently.
Today, McClatchy papers are thoroughly
modern and professionally designed newsgathering machines, heavier
on features, sports and projects than they were, and far less willing
to take down the big players that control the economic development
of the markets McClatchy dominates. If C.K. McClatchy was a cowboy,
then Gary Pruitt is a dairy farmer, more inclined to see his high-quality
products graze and grow, with editors embracing the industry's latest
trends--teams, public journalism, civic mapping, easy-to-read digests--anything
to boost circulation and the company's reputation in the world of
modern newspapers.
When C.K. died in 1989, the family put Erwin
Potts, then Pruitt in charge; in the last three decades, that triumvirate
has presided over a company whose tumultuous transformation--from
a family-owned nearly nonprofit to a publicly traded powerhouse--mirrors
the turmoil of an industry far more focused on economic performance
than on journalism. Over the years, McClatchy's vision has changed
considerably, from its founders' decree to "always [be] fighting
for the right no matter how powerfully entrenched wrong may be,"
to multiple visions and voices controlled by the publishers in each
city where McClatchy papers operate daily monopolies.
Pruitt aims to do what no other CEO of
a publicly traded newspaper company has yet accomplished: to unravel
the Gordian knot that confounds most of journalism these days, to
figure out a way to make enough money to satisfy Wall Street's unrelenting
demands while serving the public interest and redefining quality
journalism.
In the last five years, McClatchy has become
an oft-cited standard-bearer for publicly traded newspaper companies,
lauded for pledging to provide the journalistic equivalent of guns
and butter--dedicated to expanding the company while continuing
to invest in its newsrooms. The three Bees have won notice of late:
in Sacramento, for exposing sex crimes at public universities; in
Fresno, for exposing academic fraud at Fresno State; in Modesto,
for exposing shady land deals.
" For my money, they exemplify the best of chain ownership,"
says Jim Bettinger, director of the John S. Knight Fellowships
for Professional Journalists at Stanford University. "They
seem to be doing it right."
Editors and reporters so admire Pruitt
that in hundreds of interviews, only two people said anything critical
about him, neither for publication. But despite their embrace of
Pruitt, a significant number of veterans expressed serious doubts
about the reign of professional management--now prevalent industrywide--about
how those forces have hijacked McClatchy's once passionate and idealistic
vision, while relegating Jim McClatchy to a tiny office, filled
with family memorabilia, stacks of mail and Fed Ex boxes.
Unlike the Chandlers, Hearsts, Sulzbergers
and Grahams, no published history documents the McClatchys. Yet
the family's grip on California's capital and vast Central Valley--its
swing votes and rich agricultural center--historically has helped
make the state largely Democratic, counterbalancing the Republicanism
that drove the Chandler and Hearst empires in Los Angeles and San
Francisco. But that influence has waned, as the Central Valley's
largest cities have moved decidedly to the right, so much so that
when the Sacramento Bee's publisher spoke out at a local university
graduation about protecting civil liberties a few months after September
11, she was booed into silence.
Pruitt's respected strategy is straightforward:
Pay what it takes to acquire newspapers in growing regions, eschew
all "national pretensions," as he has said, make the papers
the best for their size, maintain the leading local Web site and
boost advertising market share, all the while defusing unions, raising
readership and tightly controlling expenses. "A company our
size either has to grow or die," says David Zeeck, executive
editor of the News Tribune in Tacoma, a midsize McClatchy daily.
"It's gonna eat or get eaten by somebody. Gary talks about
that all the time. You're either gonna be eaten or [be] an eater.
We want to be an eater."
Without resorting to highly public layoffs
and their attendant morale and severance costs, Pruitt quietly has
reduced the McClatchy workforce 6.9 percent through attrition since
2000, helping to contribute to record earnings in 2002 despite flat
revenues.
Among media conglomerates, McClatchy boasts
the 10th-largest daily circulation, with newspapers in rapidly growing
regions--Tacoma, on the southern part of Washington's Puget Sound;
Raleigh, at the center of North Carolina's Research Triangle; ever-expanding
Anchorage, Alaska; and, its most recent acquisition, the Star Tribune
in Minneapolis.
Pruitt promises to preserve the best of
the past while protecting journalism in the future. And if Wall
Street's demands seriously threaten journalism, he says, "We
would consider removing ourselves from the public market,"
though that has yet to occur, he quickly adds. No McClatchy paper,
Pruitt concedes, will "ever be the New York Times. But we'd
like for each of them to be the best for their size."
Five years ago, Pruitt stunned the newspaper
world by secretly buying the Star Tribune for $1.19 billion--at
the time the most money ever paid for an American newspaper--provoking
a ripe and rousing refrain of ridicule from industry insiders. "I
will prove them wrong over time," he petulantly told the New
York Times, "and I look forward to doing that." In the
years afterward, the company's stock price soared, putting Pruitt
at the table next to Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Donald Graham and P.
Anthony Ridder as a major player in the journalism business.
Most everyone who knows Pruitt appears
awestruck, mesmerized by the charisma he uses to charm journalists,
executives and Wall Street analysts alike.
There is no doubt Pruitt is sincere when
he says, as he so often does, that "good journalism is good
business." But just what good journalism is, who will define
it and how, are central questions at McClatchy. Jim McClatchy, now
82, has said he wants the company to become a "nationally recognized
example of integrity and quality in public life," one that
produces newspapers "large and small, of great quality and
great courage to lead our citizens to the better society they deserve."
[Editor's Note: This research
study upon which this article is based was funded by a grant of
the Ford Foundation. Senior American Journalism Review
writer Susan Paterno has written about McClatchy's Bee, Knight Ridder,
the Los Angeles Times and the Seattle Times. The article concludes
that McClatchy--the company that owns the three Bees (Sacramento,
Fresno and Modesto) as well as eight other dailies across the country
[Anchorage Daily News, The Fresno Bee, The Modesto Bee, The Sacramento
Bee, Minneapolis Star, North Carolina The News & Observer, South
Carolina The Beaufort Gazette, South Carolina Hilton Island Packet,
South Carolina Rock Hill The Herald, Washington Tri-City (Pasco,Kennewick,
Richland) Tri-City Herald, and Washington Tacoma The News Tribune
--has slipped, to some degree, from its early ideals but is still
a better parent than the other chains. The full text of the review
may be accessed at the University of Maryland's American Journalism
Review. Volume: 25. Issue: 6. August-September 2003.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 12, 2004
The Republican Coalition
By
Jeff Thorntom
WASHINGTON, D.C -- It
may seem strange to say this, but perhaps the Republican Party would
have been better off under President Dole. He is too old, too moderate,
and too irrelevant for the job, it is true. But his presence as
leader of the party, and his ability to help Republicans get legislation
passed, would have preserved a coalition that is quickly breaking
apart.
The conservative movement was born as a
makeshift alliance between three distinct schools of thought: anti-Communists,
libertarians, and traditional moralists. The Cold war and the ever-present
threat of the Soviet Union held it together for thirty-five years.
Now that the Russians aren’t coming, the
libertarians and the moralists are duking it out for possession
of the party. The moralists are better organized, and tend to control
the party machine. On the other hand, they are encumbered by a moral
asceticism that does not go over well with the electorate at large.
Libertarian and moderate candidates have a much easier time winning
office.
Practical considerations suggest that a
libertarian platform would be more likely to win office; yet such
a platform is inconsistent with moral conservatism, and would alienate
the one sure Republican constituency. What is the party to do?
This is a serious question. As militia
groups and the religious ultra-orthodox propose armed revolt against
the American government, it seems clear that we are at a critical
juncture. Some means must be found of accommodating the right, without
alienating the center.
A compromise would be easier if the far
right would tone down its militant rhetoric, even if they didn’t
change their policies. It would also be easier if moderates wouldn’t
call Ralph Reed a Nazi every time he mentions God. But an agreement
must be reached. If it isn’t, it will be the end of the Republican
Party. It may also be the end of the American Republic.
Comment
©1958-2004 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
January 10, 2004
COLLEGE ATHLETICS IS NOT
YOUR AVERAGE HIGHER EDUCATION ANYMORE!
Howard E. Hobbs PhD, Editor & Publisher
Bulldog Newspaper Foundation
FRESNO STATE – At Fresno State
if you are an athlete, chances are you might just not be on the
average four year college diploma track.
It’s being referred to these days as the
Athletic Training option. Perhaps, only a polite euphemism for
a host of non-academic athletes with a single goal in mind. Athletic
rigor and physical training will fulfill the requirements that
lead to athletic eligibility and perhaps eventually a certification
exam. The curriculum is part of the School
of Health and Human Services at Fresno State.
The primary mission of the school is to
provide professionally orientated education at the baccalaureate
level and to provide programs in specialized disciplines related
to health and human services.
The emphasis in athletic training and
certification as a full-time student for athletic eligibility
is then obtained through the Department of Kinesiology. Enrollment
is limited. Students interested in this program must consult an
athletic training advisor. The Athletic Training Education Program
Option is on impacted status -- the number of applications received
is greater than the number of vacancies.
Americans passionate interest in college
sports continues to grow. Unfortunately, so do problems with college
sports?like players' receiving illegal benefits, and the increasingly
rowdy behavior of fans.
Most critics have called for greater faculty
control of and involvement in college athletics, more support
for reform from university presidents, and more important, treating
students minds on college campuses first and as athletes next.
Their athletes first approach
makes it clear that the needs of the Fresno State have outweighed
those of the individual athlete.
It is not surprising, therefore, that
reforms have focused on procedural issues, like how many credits
an athlete must take or how many hours he or she can practice.
Although those issues are important, so
are the generally ignored questions of how the athlete experiences
and understands education, including participation in sports.
In addition, the athletics first orientation, in which
athletes are acted upon and which makes it easy to absolve them
of learning about, or taking responsibility for, their actions
has little to do with teaching athletes, which ought to be an
essential goal of their colleges.
This linked with the institutional emphasis
is the assumption that Fresno State athletes are, or at least
should be, treated the same as other Fresno State students.
However, the problem is that higher education
has failed to teach those in sports about sports. And by not offering
courses on sports for those who are not involved in athletics,
colleges have broadened the gap between the two groups of students.
All colleges and universities, not just
Fresno State, need to re-examine the role of intercollegiate athletics.
Students especially athletes should be able to take courses about
sports from the peecerspectives of disciplines like history, philosophy,
economics.
A recent survey of the academic courses
on sports required by colleges in the National Collegiate Athletic
Association found that of over sixty institutions that responded
a recent survey, only one required its athletes to study the history
of sports. Two required athletes to study sports psychology. None
of the institutions required a course in the impact of sports
on society, or in the philosophy of sports.
Even courses in current topics and problems
relevant to athletes' lives?eating disorders, being a public figure,
steroid use, sexual abuse, gambling were required at only nine
institutions. Colleges and universities are creating a sports
culture that is devoid of any understanding of sports.
Athletes should be required to take one
or two courses that focus on topics in sports, and other students
should be encouraged to do so. As a first step, existing courses
on relevant subjects could be reworked to add information about
sports.
The average number of credit hours that athletes
could accumulate for participating in intercollegiate sports over
a four year period was 5.2 semester credits (or 7.8 quarter credits).
Only 10 of the institutions studied
offered courses through which athletes could receive academic
credit for the practice and refinement of their sports skills
and techniques.
All the time and effort that goes into
athletics is apparently not, in the view of most colleges, an
important part of education. If those students chose instead to
study dance, music, or theater, they could earn 40 or more semester
credits for working on their performance skills.
None of the institutions offered a program
of study in sports performance, although 34 offered bachelor's
degrees in dance. Studying the cultural significance of sports
could help athletes better understand their dual roles on the
campus. Athletes would feel more involved in academics and
would thus be likely to do better in all of their courses.
If colleges and universities are sincere about
their efforts to reform athletics, they must do better.
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
NEW YORK -- The controversy
over the pairings for last week's Bowl Championship Series once
again raised the question of the most appropriate manner to stage
postseason football for National Collegiate Athletic Association's
Division I-A teams. Now in its sixth year, the BCS system, which
in effect limits participation in the four most lucrative bowl games
to members of the six strongest athletics conferences, has been
plagued with debate since its inception.
At issue are not just the shortcomings
of the computerized rankings, but also revenue, control of college
sports, and rising costs and abuses in college programs.
A bit of history might be useful for those
engaged in the current discussion. It is ironic that the new year
marks the 10th anniversary of the appointment by the NCAA Board
of Directors of an ad hoc special committee of presidents and chancellors,
athletics directors, faculty representatives, students, sports writers,
and coaches who worked from January to June 1994 to study the bowl
championship. As chancellor of the University of California at Los
Angeles, I served as chairman.
After reviewing volumes of data and conducting
a number of wide-ranging discussions, the committee held a straw
poll and voted, by an overwhelming majority, to support an eight-team,
seven-game playoff system that would rely on six bowl games.
Four would be played on January 1 at four
bowl arenas to determine the pairings for two semifinal games to
be played the following week in the two remaining bowls. The national
championship would be played on the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday
in mid-January in one of the major metropolitan stadiums. The eight
participants each year would include the champions of five or six
major conferences and two or three at-large selections.
The recommendation would also have eliminated
the preseason games, which then were, and still are, allowed. Therefore,
our playoff format would only have called for two institutions to
play one more game than permitted at the time.
The intent of the proposal was to: (a)
provide a playoff involving participants who would be required to
win their conference championship to get there; (b) ensure the continuation
of a strong, financially viable bowl structure (each of the designated
bowls would be a "premier" game because each would play
a major part in championship determination); (c) provide coordination
of the postseason format by member NCAA Division I-A institutions,
rather than by television companies and commercial sponsors; (d)
provide increased revenue for a broad range of Division I-A programs
within a controlled postseason environment; and (e) preserve the
quality of the bowls and community interests they served.
Financially, the 1994 proposal would have
partially used projected increases in revenue to indemnify the dollar
returns earned by the participating bowl associations and to provide
safety-net income to subsidize the limited number of pre-January
1 bowl games, in order to eliminate the need for teams having to
"buy" their invitations to those games with commitments
to purchase a certain number of tickets. It would also have provided
for sharing some of the revenues with the nonparticipating Division
I-A institutions and the other NCAA divisions.
The proposal was widely circulated and
well received by the sports media, as well as by many in and out
of intercollegiate athletics. But it did not survive. The 1994 committee
was disbanded by the NCAA before making its formal recommendation
because of a combination of factors: (a) a number of university
presidents believed the playoff would result in the commercialization
of postseason college football; (b) many college presidents argued
that the playoff would substantially expand the number of games
being played and, with postseason games spilling over into a new
term, would negatively affect academic performance; and (c) the
commissioners of the leading Division I-A conferences wanted a playoff
they could control, which (with more than $13-million at stake for
each team in the main bowl games) would benefit their conferences
financially. In short, it became clear that no playoff proposal
would be accepted at that time.
Instead, a few years later, we got the
BCS, which substitutes computer rankings for a playoff. It is, at
the very least, no better than the playoff proposal in responding
to the concerns that were raised against that idea and, in many
cases, much worse. Additionally, it does not produce a widely accepted
national champion.
With regard to the concern about overcommercialization,
I would merely point to what has happened to the commercialization
of the bowls, the games, and the national championship under the
BCS structure. Will the so-called national championship be played
in the Sugar Bowl, or is it the Nokia Sugar Bowl? (Some of the bowls
carry only the name of the sponsor, for instance, the GMAC Bowl.)
Who controls the stadium ads, which are
usually more visible than the teams on the fields? How many more
commercial timeouts and minutes of advertising are there now than
10 years ago? The final straw, in my mind, is the fact that the
National Championship Trophy is now named for a commercial sponsor
selected each year by the network televising the bowl games.
Thus the Sears National Championship Trophy
of 2002 became the Circuit City National Championship Trophy of
2003 and now the ADT National Championship Trophy, which the security-services
company will sponsor for three years.
By contrast, "March Madness,"
the basketball-championship tournament, is run by the NCAA, which
controls arena advertisements, exercises substantial influence over
on-the-air advertising, and has generally played down the commercial
character of an enormously popular event.
As to the added-games issue, at last count
there are now 28 postseason bowls, compared with 19 in the pre-BSC
era. There are now 18 more institutions playing an additional game
than there were when our committee was disbanded. Don't those constitute
extra games? What about the extension of the season from 11 to 12
games, which occurred this year? Presumably that was because of
a quirk in the calendar but, with the added income that the change
has produced, isn't it likely that the extension will become permanent?
There is no response, however, to the last
basis of opposition to the playoff proposal -- control of postseason
football and the revenue that comes with it. The Big Six commissioners
got what they wanted and we, the colleges and the public, are stuck
with it.
Much has changed since 1994. One television
company (ABC/ESPN) now holds the television rights to all but three
of the 28 bowl games, yet there is no organized negotiation on behalf
of the bowl-game associations, except for the four BCS games. The
major commercial-sponsorship entitlements of the four BCS games
are now primarily controlled by ABC and not by the bowl associations
or the institutions involved.
Further, the lack of a requirement for
the networks to telecast the bowl associations' accompanying parades
has led to the cancellation of the Orange Bowl Parade altogether
and the diminution of the Fiesta Bowl Parade to a lower-tier cable
station. Even the venerable Tournament of Roses Parade, an American
tradition and a favorite for decades on New Year's morning, has
found itself much diminished.
Recently, open arguments between "BCS"
and "non-BCS" institutions, conducted by Division I-A
presidents and chancellors over issues of control, financing, and
bowl appearances, have resulted in Congressional hearings and threats
of antitrust litigation or Congressional controls on college sports.
The rising costs of big-time intercollegiate athletics, the mounting
number of academic scandals making headlines, and the overcommercialization
associated, in particular, with college football have all stirred
up a new round of critiques of college athletics, led by the Knight
Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics.
With so many ills needing to be treated,
some people will say the question of postseason football is not
high on the list of priorities. One of my dear friends, a former
president of two different universities, recently asked me, "Why
do we want a champion, anyway?" The fact is, there will be
a champion selected. That being the case, let's make the process
the best it can be, especially if it can result in resolving some
other problems in college sports. A playoff system could be used
to reduce the number of games, rein in commercialization, and help
distribute the income of postseason football more fairly.
Those of us involved in the 1994 NCAA committee
were aware that our proposal might fall into the category of a "good
idea whose time has not yet come." Others may still question
whether it was a good idea at all. But, as the debate about the
structure of the Division I-A postseason continues, it might be
useful to re-examine how such a proposal might benefit educational
institutions, college athletes, and fans alike. Has its time come?
I think so.
[Editor's
Note: Charles E. Young served as chancellor of the University of
California at Los Angeles from 1968 to 1997 and just retired as
president of the University of Florida. He is a member of the current
Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics and was
a member of the two previous Knight commissions.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
January 2, 2004
So, Pete Rose Admits
Baseball Bets, Many!
By Fay Vincent
NEW YORK -- So word is
that Pete Rose finally admits in his new book that he bet on baseball.
I guess I am supposed to feel vindicated since he spent the last
14 years calling John Dowd and me names. Mr. Dowd was the baseball
lawyer who did the investigation of Mr. Rose and prepared a report
we're now told was accurate. Next we're likely to have the spectacle
of Mr. Rose being embraced by Bud Selig, the baseball commissioner,
and, like the Prodigal Son, ushered to the front row of baseball's
most honored citizens.
Pardon me while I rise to urge some caution.
Ever since St. Augustine set the bar pretty high, there has been
a certain style to confessional tomes. Now we have a mea culpa by
Mr. Rose and no saint is he. Augustine, having lived it up, saw
the light and wrote with a sense of guilt and regret. He even anguished
over having stolen a pear. Early reports are that Mr. Rose confronts
his past with very little remorse. Between him and Augustine, there
is little doubt whose book will live longer.
Why are we hearing from Mr. Rose now? Credit
Mr. Selig for insisting on the admission of betting before letting
Mr. Rose in baseball again. It's possible that Mr. Rose wants some
of the big money being paid top managers like Joe Torre. But I think
there is more at work here. A player has 20 years after he last
played to be elected by the baseball writers to the Hall of Fame.
After that time has run out, the election can be done only by the
living members of the Hall. Thus, Mr. Rose, who last played in 1986,
is running out of time. He knows his best shot is with the writers,
many of whom share the view that the only conduct that counts is
what took place on the field. The Hall of Famers are a cranky lot
who last year failed to elect Marvin Miller, who led the players
union and whose credentials are solid gold. So Mr. Rose, a careful
historian of the game, is playing the odds wisely. Nothing wrong
so far.
Now the issue for Mr. Selig is what to
do. I suggest that if Mr. Rose is to be reinstated to full rights
in baseball, there should be a two-year period of transition. During
this time, I would require Mr. Rose to travel the baseball highway
to spell out to youngsters and fans why gambling is a threat to
the game and why his decisions as manager were corrupted by betting
on one game and not another. The sincerity of his redemption can
be tested and he will have done some public service to earn his
way back. After all, the issue now is not what is best for Mr. Rose,
but what is best for baseball.
The two-year delay in reinstatement will
give him one shot at being elected by the writers. And then, if
he fails that, he may receive the honor via the Hall of Famers themselves.
And I can live with that, as I suspect most fans would, though I
am not at all certain his election is a sure bet, if I may be excused
that term.
I also suggest that Mr. Selig pardon all those
whose names are still on the ineligible list, including Max Lanier,
banned for jumping to the Mexican League to make more money, a Phillies
owner who bet on his team and was tossed out and, of course, Shoeless
Joe Jackson, whose participation in the Black Sox betting scandal
might in today's jurisprudence be excused by his diminished capacity
to have known fully what he was doing.
Perhaps this will be the end of the whole
sorry Pete Rose case. As the baseball commmissioner at the time,
Bart Giamatti, said when he announced that Mr. Rose had agreed to
banishment, baseball has been hurt, badly, by Mr. Rose's actions.
Now as we confront his plea for mercy and a second chance, we ought
to remind ourselves of Mr. Giamatti's wisdom in identifying the
pain inflicted by such a great player. I only wish Mr. Rose had
a better sense of why Augustine's "Confessions" strike
such a chord with the rest of us sinners.
[Editor's Note: Fay Vincent
was commissioner of Major League Baseball from 1989 to 1992].
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
~REPRISE~
CORRUPTION & SHAME OF
NCAA COLLEGE FOOTBALL
Howard E. Hobbs PhD, Editor & Publisher
Bulldog Newspaper Foundation Research Reports
FRESNO
STATE -- In a recent university sports economy research paper by
Mark Hales on the Bowl Championship Series [BCS] and other
bowl associations he characterized the past decade as one of organized
bamboozle, corruption, and sham especially so, within NCAA College
Football.
"Rise and Shout, the Cougars are out” of
the BCS, thus they have no chance to win a national championship.
As the Brigham Young University Fight Song says, BYU and every other
non-BCS school are barred from competing for a national title because
they are not within one of the six elite BCS conference.
Under the current BCS regime, six football
conferences, four bowls, and one network have essentially prevented
all other football conferences and teams from participating in the
product of the national championship game. Under the current established
formulas, BCS schools are automatically qualified for a BCS game
while non-BCS schools are practically barred from entry. With both
horizontal and vertical arrangements occurring between specific
bowls and conferences, the antitrust laws of the Sherman Act are
significantly violated.
Under this independent bowl system, only
nine times in 45 years did one bowl comprise the top two teams.
Since the top two teams seldom meet in a bowl game, the national
title was often split between two teams; split championships occur
when different recognized polls declared separate teams the national
champion.
By using only the Associated Press (AP)
and Coaches Poll, since 1950 there has been 10 times in which the
national title was split between two teams. When using all recognized
polls, the number of split champions increased to 44 times during
the same period. That is only seven times in over 50 years, where
division I-A football had a consensus “national champion.”
There continues to be opposition within
the NCAA to administer the post season of division I-A football.
The NCAA claims to be concerned with the potential negative effects:
disruption of student-athletes, academic calendars, lengthening
of the season, increasing the pressure to win, and the negative
effect on the bowl games.
Despite most of these concerns, the NCAA’s
Division I-AA, Division II, Division III, and other college athletic
associations have successfully established championship games through
a playoff format amidst similar concerns.
Until the early 1990’s, the entire
bowl process of selecting football teams was disorganized and often
chaotic. To remain competitive in attracting marketable teams bowls
often selected schools prior to the conclusion of the season, frequently
as early as mid-October.
In some situations, bowls made informal
arrangements prior to the season with a particular team based on
historical success or the notoriety of a particular coach.
These early selections frequently led to
mediocre teams playing in historically attractive bowl games and
rarely matched up the top two teams in the nation. Within the past
decade alone, four different systems have attempted to ...More!
[Editor's Note: Statement regarding
the Final BCS Standings Dec. 7, 2003 -- FROM PACIFIC-10 COMMISSIONER
TOM HANSEN -- "... it is most unfortunate that elements of
the BCS Standings have overruled the two polls and taken USC out
of the National Championship Game because it will generate criticism
of the BCS system, which the Pac-10 has consistently supported."As
always, the BCS will review this year's results and determine whether
changes in the Standings structure seem warranted prior to the 2004
college football season." ]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Thursday, January 1, 2004
The Math is Not Complicated
Peggy Gordon Elliott Miller, Ph.D.
FRESNO STATE --
Over a century ago, our leaders in the United States decided
if they wanted a tomorrow that was better than today, they were
going to have to invest in it.
Reeling from the expense and devastation
of the Civil War, the nation was poor. The only investment capital
available was land. Our leaders used land to foster the development
of a network of universities that produced the Cornells, the Purdues
and the all the other great land grant universities. Their graduates
are testimony to the wisdom of the investmentthey designed
roads and missiles; created vaccines and life-saving medical procedures;
and developed the safest, most abundant food supply the world has
ever known. These men and women, who contributed greatly to making
the 1900s the American Century, likely would not have attended
college without these fine institutions.
After World War II, the United States again
faced great challenges. To make the future better and to reward
those who fought in the war, the GI Bill was enacted. That investment
allowed millions of veterans to earn college degrees and their subsequent
successes raised the standard of living of the entire nation for
generations.
The GI Bill and the Higher Education Act made much of the prosperity
and progress in the last half of the twentieth century possible.
As we look ahead today, the future again
gives our nation pause. Rising unemployment, increasing loss of
industry to off shore sites, poverty, health care needs, and a host
of other indicators give us concern. We look to our national leadership
to make the kinds of wise investments that will brighten and secure
our future.
In recent years, our leaders have not stepped
up and made the investment in the future that we need. They have
taken the easy way and transferred the cost of higher
education to students and universities.
Universities have tried to help students
with the costs. Even with diminishing state appropriations, aging
campus infrastructure, and skyrocketing technology costs, 38 percent
of all undergraduates in the United States are still paying less
than $4,000 per year for tuition. Unfortunately, it is not these
university efforts that make the national press.
Students have stepped up too. According
to the National Center for Educational Statistics, in 1999-2000,
76 percent of full time dependent students attending public non-doctoral
institutions held a job while attending school. They worked an average
of 22 hours per week during school and more hours each summer as
well. About one-fifth of them are working 35 hours per week or more.
The students are doing their part.
Still, the national average of undergraduate
student loan debt has nearly doubled in the last decade. As public
policy has shifted from grants to loans, particularly hard hit have
been the sons and daughters of the poor; single parents; those in
some of our most essential, but low paid public service jobs; minorities;
and those who need to retrain for the new economy.
Today the debt load for a student finishing
college is about $17,000. That is a staggering amount for those
who want to go into crucial, but low paid professions. In many cases,
it means graduates simply cannot afford to take jobs in nursing,
social work, public health, public safety or teaching. Since women
have traditionally held many of these jobs, and generally have fewer
resources, they have been especially thwarted by the shift from
grants to loans.
Our leaders have justified the change in
financial aid from grants to loans by saying that education is a
private benefit. Indeed it is, but it is also a public good. When
one person advances, all of us are benefited. Economists love to
prove this, and they can.
If we are going to have the future that each of us wants for ourselves
and our nation, we have to give more of our citizens, young and
the old, the opportunity to access higher education. We cannot just
hope for a decent future. We must make a major investment in the
people and the institutions that can build and drive the new economy.
The United States can afford to make the
investment. If Congress appropriated an amount equal to the GI Bill,
in todays dollars, it would cost approximately $30 billion
per year. That same Congress has told us repeatedly that the nation
can well afford a tax cut of $1.3 trillion and an $87 billion dollar
to Iraq. The math is not complicated. We know we can afford to invest
in our future.
Many of the young people who went to Iraq
were college students. Many had joined their local National Guard
Unit to help pay some of the costs of their education. But when
the nation needed them, all of them offered us their lives. Over
140 students have already left my campus. Few of them have returned,
and more are being activated. I, for one, dont want to have
to tell any of them that the best the nation can do to help with
their higher education is to raise their loan limits. The math is
not complicated. They know we can afford to invest in their future.
As the United States makes its way into
the twenty-first century, it is imperative that we look beyond the
current budget cycle, the next election, the lobbying of the loan
industry, and anything else that takes our eyes off the future.
A good future requires investment. A Higher
Education Reauthorization Act that puts the dollars on the table
to eliminate the crushing burden of excessive loans, that re-opens
doors to progress with grants for students, that provides decent
facilities in which learning can occur, and that funds research
to enrich us all is still the best blue chip investment for this
nation.
Nobody else is going to invest in the future
of the United States. We have to do that ourselves, and as citizens,
we have to demand that it be done. We know the return on that investment.
The math is not complicated.
[Editor's
Note: See this
link for an update on the role of military in higher education.
Peggy Gordon Elliott Miller, Ph.D. has been the president of South
Dakota State University since January 1, 1998.]
Comment
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Wednesday, December. 31, 2003
UCLA's Ball,
USC's Rogers
Win Morris Trophy
Dave Hirsch PAC-10
Public Relations
WALNUT CREEK, Calif.--
PACIFIC-10 CONFERENCE--Named defensive end Dave Ball of UCLA and
offensive tackle Jacob Rogers of USC as winners of the Morris Trophy
as outstanding defensive and offensive linemen in the Conference.
Defensive end Dave Ball of UCLA and offensive tackle Jacob Rogers
of USC have been named winners of the 24th annual Morris Trophy.
The Morris Trophy is a unique award given
to the outstanding offensive and defensive linemen in the Pacific-10
Conference. What makes the award unique is the selection procedure,
which has the starting offensive linemen in the Conference voting
for the defensive winner and vice versa. It is truly a players'
award.
Ball, a 6-foot-6, 275-pound senior from
Dixon, Calif., is the national leader in quarterback sacks with
16.5. He leads the Pac-10 in tackles for loss (20.5) as well as
sacks and ranks second in the Conference in fumbles forced with
five. His 16.5 quarterback sacks established a UCLA season record
and he also holds the Bruin career record at 30.5.
Ball has already been named a first-team
All-America selection by both the American Football Coaches Association
and the Football Writers Association of America. He was a unanimous
All-Pac-10 selection and was voted the Pac-10 Defensive Player of
the Year by the league's head coaches. He is a finalist for three
major awards--the Bronko Nagurski Award (top defensive player),
the Rotary Lombardi Awards (top lineman) and the Ted Hendricks Defensive
End of the Year Award.
Rogers, a 6-foot-6, 305-pound senior from
Oxnard, Calif., becomes the eighth USC offensive lineman to win
the Morris Trophy in the 24-year history of the award. Rogers is
recognized as one of the top offensive linemen in the country after
three years of starting at the left tackle spot for the Trojans.
He is a two-time first-team All-Pac-10 selection and was a unanimous
pick to the team this season in voting conducted by the league's
head coaches. Rogers also has been named a first-team All-America
selection by both the American Football Coaches Association and
the Football Writers Association of America.
Comment
|
|
Wednesday, December. 31, 2003
SILICON VALLEY
FOOTBALL CLASSIC
BEATS ODDS TO SURVIVE
By Mark Purdy
Mercury News
SAN JOSE -- On the first
play from scrimmage, Fresno State completed a pass -- to a UCLA
defensive tackle. And thus was the fourth annual Silicon Valley
Football Classic inaugurated Tuesday night.
No, these were not the best two teams in
America. They weren't even the 40th- and 41st-best teams in America.
But as the evening progressed, San Jose's most prestigious college
bowl game -- also, its only one -- proved once more to be an entertaining,
if sloppy, production.
In fact, Fresno State's 17-9 victory pretty
much lived up to the pregame prediction of Bulldogs Coach Pat Hill.``It's
going to be a quagmire out there again,'' Hill had said.
He meant the muddy field conditions at Spartan
Stadium, not the UCLA offensive game plan or Fresno State's troubled
kicking game. But what is a lower-tier bowl game for, if not to
showcase two teams trying to overcome their dreadful weaknesses
while creating surprises for young and old alike?
For instance: The UCLA defense was ranked
second best in the Pacific-10 Conference this season -- but Fresno
State racked up 260 offensive yards in the first half and dominated
the line of scrimmage most of the evening.
For another instance: Fresno State hadn't
endured a blocked punt all season but gave up one in the third quarter
that turned into a safety when the ball landed out of the end zone.
After all the twists and turns, however,
the Bulldogs finished on top. And by doing so, Fresno State proved
. . . well, something.
One national Web site, noting that UCLA
came into the game with a 6-6 won-lost record while Fresno State
was 8-5, labeled this the worst of this season's 28 bowl matchups.
So presumably, Fresno State can proclaim itself the 55th-best team
in the nation. Given how ugly some of the other bowl games have
been, that hardly seems fair. So let's put the Bulldogs in the top
50, at least.
Also, this was the first time a Fresno
State football team has defeated UCLA in six attempts, dating to
1927. That has to be a good feeling.
And finally, because Fresno State has played
in all four of the Silicon Valley Football Classic games, it's probably
time to award the Bulldogs' seniors honorary San Jose citizenship.
Yet the biggest victory Tuesday was that
the Silicon Valley Football Classic survived another year, against
all odds and to the bafflement of many.
We all know the deal. There has never been
any demonstrated local public demand for the game, which is barely
a blip on the Bay Area sports radar screen. But the San Jose Convention
and Visitors' Bureau has propped up the event, for the benefit of
the local hospitality industry. The city's hotel rooms don't exactly
fill up over the holidays, so any revenue from bowl visitors is
welcome.
The SVFC was created and originally driven
by San Jose State, which hoped the game would give it more clout
with the Western Athletic Conference. That didn't exactly happen,
and when the 30,000 Spartan Stadium seats were barely one-third
occupied for last year's game between Fresno and Georgia Tech, the
assumption was that if the 2003 Silicon Valley Football Classic
were even played, it would surely be the last one.
That doesn't appear to be the case. In
fact, this might be the year the game actually gained some traction.
When UCLA was invited after losing its final four regular-season
games, the assumption was that only a few dozen Bruins fans might
show up. Instead, some 6,000 folks in powder blue filled the east
stands of the stadium.
In the end, there were 20,126 tickets distributed
-- which was the official announced attendance -- and from the looks
of it, about 17,000 of the tickets were actually used.
For this, you can credit the bowl game's
new board, headed by Sharks CEO Greg Jamison. San Jose State is
more or less out of the bowl's picture entirely, replaced by a staff
hired at the behest of Convention and Visitors' Bureau officials.
The event's new executive director, C. Jay Key, also managed to
sign up some corporate partners that hadn't participated in previous
years.
He also helped organize some social events
around the game, including organized tailgate parties for both schools.
In a brief halftime interview, Jamison promised
that the game would be played again next year. But even he knows
that until the stadium is close to full on a regular basis, the
Silicon Valley Football Classic can't be called anything close to
a fixture on the South Bay scene.
``If the bowl becomes part of the fabric
of the community, that's when we will know,'' Jamison said. ``The
game is good for the city. But it takes time to grow.''
Of course, there were no complaints from
Fresno State's players or Hill, who is SVFC's biggest cheerleader
-- literally. From the first quarter onward, Hill frequently took
off his hat and gestured with his arms to fire up the Bulldogs fans
seated behind the Fresno State bench.
It wasn't needed. Fresno State's fans were
into it all the way. This was an amplified version of the annual
South Bay class warfare between Stanford and San Jose State, where
the underdog state university in an underdog conference is matched
up against the rich Pac-10 school with the more prestigious name.
Hill is fighting the good fight at Fresno
State, trying to gain recognition for his school by playing against
any team, any time. But the Bruins hadn't played the Bulldogs since
the 2000 season and have no intention of doing so in the near future.
As Fresno State tackle Dartangon Shack told the Fresno Bee the other
day, he never expected to get another chance at playing UCLA in
his lifetime.
``They get all the fame and we get the
leftovers,'' Shack said. ``That's what we're fighting for, a little
respect within our state.''
Respect, the Bulldogs got Tuesday night.
As for the Silicon Valley Football Classic, it's still trying. But
it may have gotten off life support. That's progress.
©
2003 Mercury News and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
Comment
|
|
Sunday, December 28, 2003
Faith, Hope
And Above All
Clarity Clarity Clarity!
By Amy Williams Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Alice Knox
Eaton writes in her column this week "Faith, Persistence
and Luck" (Chron of Higher
Ed) that in her first year on
a university tenure track job in English, her department asked her
to head up a search committee for a new hire. Eaton had been one
of 166 applicants for her position, and they ended up with nearly
100 for this new opening.
It was not what many Ph.D.'s would consider
a plum job. It's a small college with a heavy teaching load of four
courses each semester, half of them in freshman composition. The
pile of applications that accumulated in the department's office
exuded an air of desperation. And the legion of English Ph.D.'s
who will converge on the Modern Language Association's
annual meeting later this month know it well, too.
Eaton told reporters this week, "For
me, ending up where I am somehow required years of crisis, and I
am happy, even at peace, to be here at last. I must trust that job
candidates will find for themselves a way to survive the cruelties
of the job market, and emerge, battle-scarred perhaps, but intact."
I will add my insight to Eaton's. In a
slow economy like this one, it can be difficult to land even an
entry-level job. To those who feel stymied in their job searches
or frustrated by the lack of openings, I recommend temporary office
work as a strategy for breaking into a new field.
Many graduate students are familiar with
temping as a way to earn quick money during university
vacations, but temping can also be a way to audition for
a full-time job at the company of your choice.
In fact, while some employers might resist
hiring a seemingly overqualified Ph.D. for a full-time, entry-level
position, they have no such qualms about hiring a Ph.D. in a temporary
position.
[Editor's Note: Alice
Knox Eaton is an assistant professor of English at Springfield College
in Springfield, Mass.]
Comment
|
|
December 27, 2003
Fresno State's Bad News Dogs
By The Bulldog News Staff
Clips from the Chronicle of Higher
Education:
2/14/2003 Fresno State Criticized for Invitations to Radical
Environmentalists
...Fresno State Criticized for Invitations to Radical Environmentalists
California State University at Fresno has come under fire for planning
a conference on "revolutionary environmentalism" that
includes participants associated ...
3/7/2003 Fresno State Faces Academic Scandal
...Fresno State Faces Academic Scandal A team statistician wrote
17 papers for basketball players at California State University
at Fresno and was paid off by a sports agent, according to a report
last month in The Fresno ...
5/11/1994 Athletes Investigated for Food-Stamp Fraud
...Athletes Investigated for Food-Stamp Fraud By Debra E. Blum Seven
football players on full athletic scholarship at Fresno State University
fraudulently received food-stamp benefits intended for homeless
people last academic year, according ...
5/2/1997 Fresno State Athlete Sues Paper Over Story on Point-Shaving
...ATHLETICS NOTES Fresno State Athlete Sues Paper Over Story on
Point-Shaving By Jim Naughton A basketball player at California
State University at Fresno has sued The Fresno Bee, charging that
the newspaper libeled him in stories about ...
1/28/1995 Fresno Flips for 'Tark the Shark' Despite Coach's Reputation
...mall on the sort of sunny, 75-degree day that comes all too rarely
during Fresno's stifling summers. Jeanne Alburn, a Fresno State
alumna, drove for an hour from Visalia, Cal., to get a signed T-shirt
for her husband.
1/22/1999 Martin Luther King, Jr., to Be Honored at Fresno State
... Martin Luther King, Jr., to Be Honored at Fresno State Fresno,
Cal. The campus of California State University here planned to unveil
a bronze statue of Martin Luther King, Jr., this week, in honor
of the slain civil-rights leader's ...
5/2/2003 3 Universities Announce Cutbacks in Sports
...55-percent men and 45-percent women, compared with a 54-46 ratio
in the undergraduate student body. Earlier in the same week, Fresno
State announced that it would give
9/22/1995 Athletics Director to Move From Fresno to Santa Barbara
...at Fresno, has taken the same job at the University of California
at Santa Barbara. Mr. Cunningham, who had been at Fresno State for
nine years, was in the running to head sports programs at several
colleges in recent months. He had ...
6/4/1999 California State's Division I Colleges Struggle to Meet
Gender-Equity Goals
...from dropping men's wrestling, or even capping the number of
men on the team, after wrestlers sued the university. Fresno State
is furthest from meeting the requirements for program expenses and
scholarship budgets, largely because ...
3/28/2003 Foul Shots: Sportswriters on the Basketball Scandals
...of Rhode Island. He was suspended from the Georgia team in January
2002, after a woman filed rape charges against him. At Fresno State,
where Jerry Tarkanian was the basketball coach and his son was assistant
coach, the team statistician ..
3/28/2003 When the President Is Part of the Problem
...were punished for violations that had occurred on his watch.
Three years later, Mr. Welty hired Mr. Tarkanian, a Fresno State
alumnus and the overwhelming popular choice in the community. "Our
search committee recommended him, and the ...
3/21/1997 2 Probes of Alleged Point Shaving Roil College Basketball
...Arizona State, said the university would cooperate with the F.B.I.,
but that it had not yet been asked to do so. Officials at Fresno
State are conducting their investigation in conjunction with the
Western Athletic Conference and the ...
3/27/1998 Problems Dog California State U. at Fresno's Basketball
Team
...who said he did not watch the report, labeled it "unfair"
because it failed to mention that in response to the team's problems,
Fresno State had "developed one of the most stringent codes
of conduct in America, and has successfully ...
3/14/2003 2 Colleges End Basketball Early
...and I believe it is in the best long-term interest of the basketball
program and the university," Mr. Welty said in a statement.
Fresno State clinched the regular-season Western Athletic Conference
title over the weekend with a win ...
10/7/1992 A Poet of the Industrial Heartland
...poetic achievements" from the American Council for the Arts
and the American Poetry Association. Mr. Levine arrived at Fresno
State in 1958. Over the years he has spent periods at several institutions,
including Columbia, Princeton, ...
12/19/2003 A Hard Year in College Sports
...standards so that incoming players with very poor SAT scores
and very good high-school grades can be eligible. April 15: Fresno
State announces plans to drop men's cross-country, soccer, and indoor
track and field, as well as women's ...
7/16/1999 Gang Warfare in Academe
...I have known for 30 years, was very happy to hear that fear,
envy, and Schadenfreude exist at many other institutions besides
Fresno State. George W. Raney Chair Department of Linguistics Professor
of Linguistics California State University ...
3/26/1999 Far-Flung Members Debate Future of Western Athletic Conference
... (Athletics) and Texas Christian might try to persuade some members
of Conference USA to jump ship and join a new midwestern league.
Fresno State, meanwhile, is rumored to be pursuing a spot in the
Mountain West. Athletics directors and presidents ...
4/27/1994 ...From The Universe, a newspaper at Brigham Young University:
"What do the players and coaches of the WAC think of BYU? .
"Fresno State head coach Jim Sweeny on BYU's defense and playing
BYU at home: "`If our defense was as good as BYU's ...
1/14/2000 Novel Corporate Deal Will Finance New Basketball Arena
for U. of Maryland
...Texas Tech University and SBC Communications. Save Mart Supermarkets,
a grocery-store chain based in Modesto, Calif., is paying Fresno
State $20-million over 20 years for the right to the name of the
Bulldogs' new basketball arena, ...
9/3/1999 What You Should Know About This Year's Freshmen
...fall? Telephone calls to several of the students listed on the
Platteville Web site were not returned. Era of Ferment at Fresno
State Some students are versed in the art of guzzling wine. Students
at California State University at Fresno ...
6/17/1992 California Colleges Brace for Big Cuts in State Financing
...cut or eliminate any programs or departments. Thomas J. Ebert,
president of the California Faculty Association's chapter at Fresno
State University, which is also experiencing widespread cuts and
layoffs, said a huge budget cut would ...
4/18/2003 IRS Ruling on Naming Rights for Facilities May Jeopardize
Status of Some Tax-Exempt Bonds
...the Value City Arena at the Jerome Schottenstein Center. Deborah
Adishian-Astone, executive director of auxiliary services at Fresno
State, says that the university used tax-exempt bonds to finance
the Save Mart Center, but that the ...
6/6/2003 Cutting the Field: As Colleges Eliminate Teams, the Lessons
Athletes Learn Are Losing Out to Commercial Interests
...culture we live in, people favor the entertainment sports over
the participation sports," says Bob Fraley, track coach at
Fresno State since 1980. "People are willing to spend money
on entertainment, but participation sports cost money.
Comment
|
|
December 25, 2003
Harold Haak
Former Fresno State President
Hospitalized in Coma
by Amy Williams, Staff Writer
FRESNO
STATE -- Dr. Harold H. Haak, 68, former president of Fresno Pacific
University, and CSU Fresno suffered a stroke and lapsed into a coma
earlier on Christmas Day.
A spokesperson for Dr. Welty, John Kaiser,
told reporters that Dr. Haak had suffered what was thought to have
been an allergy spell and was admitted to St. Agnes Hospital.
A hospital spokesperson reported that Haak
has been placed on a respirator to assist him in normal breathing.
Dr. Haak officially retired in 1991 after
10 years at the top administrator post of the university.
During his tenure in office, the Fresno State's
academic programs achieved praise, the Madden Library was expanded,
and athletics programs were accepted into the WAC.
In over 40 years in higher
education Haak served also as a professor and later as chancellor
at University Colorado at Denver. He holds the bachelor's and master's
from University of Wisconsin and a Ph.D. from Princeton.
Comment
|
|
December 19, 2003
Recording Industry's Rocky Road
By Thomas Hobbs, Staff Writer
WASH., DC -- In a surprise decision Friday, a U.S. appeals court
overturned a decision in favor of the Recording Industry Association
of America (RIAA).
The three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that
Internet service providers can’t be held responsible for material
that passes through their Internet network.
Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge John D.
Bates approved use of subpoenas by the RIAA, forcing one service
provider, Verizon, to turn over names and addresses of at least
four Internet subscribers. Since then, Verizon, Comcast, and many
other ISPs have identified dozens of subscribers to music industry
lawyers. These tactics have served as the basis for hundreds of
lawsuits filed against individual Internet users all over the U.S.
In Friday’s ruling, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg
indicated the RIAA's campaign oversteps the bounds of the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which Congress approved in
1998. The DMCA does not give copyright holders the ability to subpoena
customer names from Internet providers without filing a formal lawsuit.
Judge Ginsburg wrote in his decision the “…DMCA
betrays no awareness whatsoever that Internet users might be able
to directly exchange files containing copyrighted works. It is not
the province of the courts to rewrite the DMCA in order to make
it fit a new and unforeseen Internet architecture, no matter how
damaging that development has been to the music industry.”
The RIAA, nevertheless, vows to continue
its campaign and added that the decision "unfortunately means
we can no longer notify illegal file sharers before we file lawsuits
against them to offer the opportunity to settle outside of litigation,"
according to a statement from RIAA president Cary Sherman. "We
can and will continue to file copyright infringement lawsuits against
file sharers who engage in illegal activity."
Since the development of Internet file sharing
programs like Napster, Kazaa, LimeWire, and others, the recording
industry has been hard pressed to regain control of its copyrighted
digital materials, including recorded music and video. The RIAA
blames the widespread copying of music over the Internet for falling
CD sales and lost profits.
[Editor’s Note: While legitimate file sharing services
such as the newly revamped Napster
and Apple’s
iTunes appear to be gaining in popularity, the future of these
services is still in question. At an Apple financial analyst conference,
CEO Steve Jobs admitted that Apple
makes no revenue from its iTunes online download service that
launched in April 2003. "Most of the money goes to the music
companies," admitted Jobs. "We would like to break even
and make a little bit of money but it's not a money maker,"
he said. When the conversation turned to rivals such as Napster,
Jobs said: "They don't make iPods, so they don't have a related
business where they can make money."]
Comment
|
|
December 11, 2003
CSU New Budget
Calls for Deep Cuts, Reductions
of $345,000,000 and More
By Thomas Hobbs, Associate Editor
FRESNO STATE -- In the face of the dramatic
announcement from Sacramento earlier this week on cost cutting in
the hundreds of millions of dollars, CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed
announced that all staff salaries had been frozen and that system
wide graduate and undergraduate fees have now been increased by
30%.
Even worse, the new budget requires dramatic
restructuring and cutting-off all new enrollment growth by the Academic
Year 2004-2005.
In a letter received this week by all University
employees, Reed wrote "...Many of our campuses will be limiting
or cutting off enrollment for the spring session. For the long
term, it means that our state must reform its higher education financing
structure in a way that allows us to provide access to a quality
education in good economic times and bad..."
Research shows that higher education can
add significantly to the subsequent earnings of some students. Returns
do vary, however, with such factors as family background, innate
ability, and the program of study pursued.
Present occupational projections indicate
that the majority of jobs in the immediate future ten years or so,
will still not require higher education or a university diploma.
Statistics for the past decade reveal the number of college educated
individuals working in jobs that do not require education beyond
high school has actually increased,
The evidence indicates that many of these
college-educated workers lack literacy skills traditionally associated
with holding a university degree. Keep this is mind -- people who
attend the university tend to be more talented and motivated those
who do not enroll.
Yet, economists who study such effects
report that difference in ability account for only a small differential
in the ability of workers who make higher earnings in demanding
jobs.
Dr. David Card, UC Berkeley concludes from
his studies of the subject, "...the ability-bias factor is
not large." In this, he concludes with Gary Becker and others,
that the difference in earning between those with and those without
a university degree is a minimal 10%, at best.
Don't forget that returns on the student's
investment in obtaining a university education vary greatly across
programs of study and the reputation of the particular university
and its administrative leadership.
[Editor's
Note: Here's a little about the competition for jobs. From 1970
to 1991, the percentage of the population in the United States who
completed four years or more of college doubled, increasing from
10.7% to 21.4%. In 1990, in the United States, the average earnings
of a male who had completed 5 or more years of college was $55,831.00
(female, $35,827.00); the average earnings of a male who had completed
only 1 to 3 years of high school was $22,564.00 (female, $15,381.00).
Since 1970, the percentage of the population in the United States
(aged 25 years and older, who completed 4 or more years of college)
has doubled, and the percentage of the population completing only
8 years of elementary school has been reduced by 2/3. To access
a link to the Chancellor's Letter go to http://www.calstate.edu/executive/031209.shtml
].
Comment
|
|
December 10, 2003
I'ts War on Higher Education
How academe's leaders respond to the Assault
on its Autonomy and professional integrity?
By Stanley Fish, Contributor
FRESNO STATE -- Two columns ago, I analyzed "The College Cost
Crisis," a report written (or at least signed) by U.S. Reps. John
A. Boehner, an Ohio Republican, and Howard P. (Buck) McKeon, a
California Republican, both members of the House Committee on
Education and the Workforce. I found the report misleading, shoddy,
slipshod, superficial, meretricious, and worthless, and gave it
a failing grade.
One would think it would be hard, even for Representatives Boehner
and McKeon, to outdo that performance, but I underestimated their
resourcefulness. The two anti-higher-education crusaders have
now produced a Web site again at the taxpayers' expense -- and
it earns all the adjectives I bestowed on their first effort plus
one more: dishonest.
The centerpiece of the Web site -- College Cost Central:
A Resource for Parents, Students, & Taxpayers Fed Up With
the High Cost of Higher Education -- is a list of 12 yes-or-no
questions to which those same parents, students, and taxpayers
are asked to respond. Only three of the questions are real; that
is, only three of the questions are framed with the objective
of finding out something the researchers don't already know or
think they know. The others are designed to elicit -- no,
coerce -- responses that can then be used to support the
conclusions that McKeon and Boehner have reached in advance of
doing any research at all.
Here, for example, is the first question: "Can colleges and universities
be doing more to control their spending and avoid large tuition
hikes that hurt parents and students?" Although this has the form
of a question, its core content is four unsubstantiated assertions:
colleges and universities do not control their spending; uncontrolled
spending is the sole cause of tuition hikes; those hikes are large
(in relation to what norms or practices is never specified); and
they hurt parents and students.
The real question then is, "Do you think that colleges and universities
should stop doing these horrible things?" and of course anyone
who understands it that way (and what other way is there to understand
it?) will answer "yes" and thus provide Boehner and McKeon with
one more piece of "evidence" with which to convict higher education
of multiple offenses.
The second question is even cleverer: "Do parents and students
have adequate information about college financing and the ways
in which colleges spend their money?" McKeon and Boehner like
this question so much that they ask it again two slots later:
"Do parents and students have the information they need to fully
exercise their power as consumers in the higher-education marketplace?"
The right answer to both questions -- and it is the right
answer -- is "no": Parents and students do not generally
have that information.
But is it the responsibility of the colleges and universities
to provide it, which could be done only by mounting monthlong
seminars at a cost that would then be added to the "skyrocketing"
tuition paid by the students and parents who attended them (if
they did, and they probably wouldn't)?
If students or parents wanted to understand college financing
(an understanding apparently beyond the reach of members of Congress),
wouldn't it be their obligation first to frame the question (easier
said than done) and then to do the research, just as it is the
obligation of buyers in any marketplace to make themselves into
informed consumers? I use the vocabulary of "consumers" and "marketplace"
only because Boehner and McKeon do (I consider it wildly inappropriate),
but in the mercantile contexts from which the vocabulary is drawn,
the rule is still caveat emptor, and no vendor is expected
to explain in detail how the product he offers is made.
The "consumers" for whom McKeon and Boehner show such solicitude
are, in the jargon of any trade, lazy; and indeed it is the beauty
of the question that it allows those who haven't bothered to learn
how colleges work to transfer the culpability of their ignorance
to another party. "I don't know what I'm doing; it must be your
fault." Answering the question makes you feel good and even self-righteous
about a failure that is finally yours. (There's a kind of genius
working here, although it is malign.)
If a question doesn't coerce or pander, it imputes blame where
there may not be any: "Do you believe the construction of facilities
at colleges and universities is contributing to the dramatic increases
in the cost of higher education?" The suggestion is that a "yes"
answer (to which the respondent is obviously directed) would mean
that colleges and universities were doing something wrong.
But what would it be? Constructing laboratories? Dormitories?
Libraries? Classroom buildings? Could an academic institution
be doing its job and not be constructing facilities? What's the
point of this question? No point really, except to add one more
(underdefined) item to the list of crimes of which colleges and
universities are presumed guilty in this indictment masquerading
as a survey.
It is not an indictment solely constructed by Boehner and McKeon,
who are merely playing their part in a coordinated effort to commandeer
higher education by discrediting it. If the public can be persuaded
that institutions of higher education are fiscally and pedagogically
irresponsible, the way will be open to a double agenda: strip
colleges and universities of both federal and state support and
then tie whatever funds are left to "performance" measures in
the name of accountability and assessment.
The folks who gave us the Political Correctness scare in the '90s
(and that was one of the best PR campaigns ever mounted) are once
again in high gear and their message is simple: Higher education
is too important to be left to the educators, who are wasting
your money, teaching your children to be unpatriotic and irreligious
(when they are teaching at all), and running a closed shop that
is hostile to the values of mainstream America.
It's a potent formula: less money, more controls, and controls
by the right people; not pointy-headed professors or wooly-headed
administrators, but hard-headed businessmen who will rein in the
excesses (monetary and moral) to which people with too many advanced
degrees are prone.
The assault is sophisticated and it comes from several directions
and assumes different forms. There is the old accusation (tried
but not true) that faculty members spend too much time on arcane
research and not enough on teaching. Recently this old saw has
been given a new twist by pundits who complain, as David Kirp,
a professor of public policy at Berkeley, has in The New York
Times, that universities are competing with one another in
an unseemly fashion to lure star professors whose "main loyalty"
is to "what they write" rather than "to their students or their
institution."
As usual, no evidence is provided for this libel which, given
everything I have seen and experienced in 43 years of teaching,
is simply false. People just can't seem to think straight about
this one. Last month at an economic summit called by the Illinois
governor, several speakers rose to pay tribute to researchers
at the university who, it was said, were providing the technology
and biomedical knowledge so necessary to the state's economy.
Yet these same speakers, some of them state officials, saw no
connection between their praise and the demand, to which they
give voice on other occasions, that professors get out of the
laboratory and back into the classroom.
When professors are not being attacked for doing too much research,
they are being attacked for having the wrong political opinions.
David Brooks is only the most recent sage to point out that, especially
in the humanities and social sciences, a huge percentage of the
faculty is self-identified as left of center. The result, says
Brooks, a columnist for the Times, is a small brave band
of conservative professors and students who are the victims of
discrimination and can cope only if they "keep their views in
the closet."
This is a mixture of nonsense and paranoia. In any institution
I have ever taught at, conservative students are more vocal than
their counterparts, especially when they are complaining loudly
that their voices aren't being heard. And as for the assertion
that "faculties skew overwhelmingly to the left," I would say
first that it is a supply-side problem -- if conservatives
really want to spend their lives teaching modern poetry and Byzantine
art, they should stop whining and do the dissertations and write
the books, and they'll get the jobs -- and second, that it's
not a problem.
There is no necessary, or even likely, correlation between the
way one votes in a local or national election and the way one
teaches or conducts research. Every permutation -- Republican
voters who espouse radical epistemological theories, Democratic
voters who resist theory and stand up for traditional academic
practices -- is possible and easily documented.
Brooks laments that students "often have no contact with adult
conservatives" (a version of the "role model" argument that he
and his friends usually reject as demeaning); but the real shame
would be if students had no contact with highly qualified, cutting-edge
instructors. The political affiliation of one's professors should
be of no concern at all -- and Brooks himself in another
piece reports that students quickly discount their instructors'
political views when they become aware of them -- as long
as that affiliation and its imperatives are not substituted for
the educational and scholarly imperatives that should be the only
reference points in the classroom.
But that's just the trouble, some conservative critics reply.
All too often, they argue, teachers use the classroom as a vehicle
for political indoctrination, and administrators contribute to
the hegemony of liberal thought by refusing to finance conservative
groups and speakers. Here the response is easy. If an administration
is really distributing money and meeting rooms according to political
criteria, it is engaging in unconstitutional activity (see Rosenberger
v. Rector, 1995) and any court in the land will stop it.
And if teachers are really indoctrinating rather than instructing
students -- something difficult to do in 90 percent of the
classes one might teach -- they should be reprimanded and,
if they persist, removed from the classroom. In short, the proper
antidote to educational malprac-tice is to insist on fidelity
to the educational mission. The proper antidote is not, however,
to "seek academic diversity," as U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia
Republican, is trying to do by introducing an "Academic Bill of
Rights" that would ask universities to provide "a level playing
field" marked by "intellectual diversity."
Intellectual diversity is not a respectable intellectual goal.
The only respectable intellectual goal is the pursuit of truth,
and if in the course of that pursuit many different approaches
arise, as they will in some fields, that's fine; but it would
also be fine if in a particular field there were (at least temporarily)
a convergence of views and not very much diversity at all.
The requirement of diversity is always, whether it issues from
the right or the left, a political requirement, and it is the
thinly disguised agenda of Representative Kingston and others
to alter the political makeup of university faculties and install
in key positions academics who think as they do.
This was clearly the case when someone
from the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent a list of projects
-- investigating among other things the populations at risk
for infection by the AIDS virus -- that should not be funded
to the National Institutes of Health. It turned out that the list
was compiled by something called the Traditional Values Coalition,
which believes that abstinence and fidelity are the best responses
to the epidemic. To be sure, the coalition is entitled to its
beliefs. What it is not entitled to is the tailoring of publicly
financed scientific research to conform with those beliefs.
I could go on listing the signs. They are everywhere, and what
they are signs of is the general project of taking higher education
away from the educators -- by removing money, imposing controls,
capping tuition, enforcing affirmative action for conservatives,
stigmatizing research on partisan grounds, privatizing student
loans (here McKeon is again a big player) -- and handing
it over to a small group of ideologues who will tell colleges
and universities what to do and back up their commands by swinging
the two big sticks of financial deprivation and inflamed public
opinion.
So much is clear and indisputable. What is not clear is the response
of the academic community to this assault on its autonomy and
professional integrity. Too often that response has been of the
weak-kneed variety displayed by the Association of American Universities
when its president, Nils Hasselmo, offered a mild criticism of
McKeon's ideas and then said "We look forward to working with
Mr. McKeon."
No, you should look forward to defeating McKeon and his ilk, and
that won't be done by mealy-mouthed me-tooism. If the academic
community does its usual thing and rolls over and plays dead,
in time it will not just be playing dead. It will be dead.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog
Newspaper Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
December 3, 2003
Boston College Student Weekly Newspaper
Under Attack by Administration
By Jeffry R. Young
BOSTON -- College officials
are seeking to add provisions to a routine office-lease agreement
with a student newspaper that would give the Roman Catholic institution
a more powerful voice in the publication's business and editorial
operations. Among other directives, the college has proposed banning
cigarette and alcohol advertising and forcing the paper to create
an advisory board that includes at least one administrator.
Editors of the independent weekly newspaper,
The Heights, rejected many of the proposals in a letter they
sent last week to Cheryl Presley, the college's vice president for
student affairs. They argued that the new terms would compromise
the newspaper's independence and would violate their right to free
expression. The annual lease is up for renewal in early December,
and administrators proposed the new provisions about six weeks ago.
Details of the college's proposal were
first published this week by Boston Magazine Online.
Negotiations are still under way, and both
sides say they still hope to reach a compromise. But Nancy E. Reardon,
a senior who is the newspaper's editor in chief, said that members
of the Editorial Board had decided that they would refuse to sign
the lease unless at least some of the new language was removed.
And Jack Dunn, director of public affairs at Boston College, said
that some of the terms, such as the advertising restrictions, are
"nonnegotiable."
Outside observers are surprised at the
college's tactics. Mark Goodman, executive director of the Student
Press Law Center, a nonprofit group, said that the college's proposals
are "unprecedented."
"No self-respecting institution would
even present these arguments," he said. The most troubling
part of the plan, he said, is asking the newspaper to establish
an advisory board that would give college administrators direct
involvement with the paper.
In the letter to Ms. Presley, the editors
argued that the proposal "would dismantle the wall of separation
between The Heights and the administration." Mr. Dunn said,
however, that the students were mischaracterizing the college's
terms. "There is no desire on behalf of the university to control
the content of one of three student newspapers on campus,"
he said.
Referring to meetings between administrators
and editors, he said that "we clearly stated that the intention
was to create a liaison between the dean of student development
and The Heights newspaper so that there could be some formal mechanism
to have some informal discussions."
Ms. Reardon said that such communication
already takes place regularly. As for the proposed ban on cigarette
and alcohol ads, Mr. Dunn said it grew in part out of frustration
with the newspaper's decision this fall to run an advertisement
for a local bar featuring "gratuitous, sexually explicit"
content that drew complaints from parents, alumni, and administrators.
Ms. Reardon said she had heard "no
uproar" about the ad, which she said depicted a woman "who
had some cleavage showing" and was "nothing more bawdy
than what you would see in an underwear ad."
One content restriction has long been in
place in the newspaper's lease. Since 1978, the lease has banned
the paper from running ads advocating abortion.
Ms. Reardon said that editors accept the
abortion-ad ban but are uncomfortable with the newly proposed restrictions,
which they fear could lead to a "slippery slope" of control
by the college.
The proposed lease also calls for the paper
to provide discounted advertising rates to recognized student organizations,
to develop an ethics policy, to establish a board of directors,
to hire an ombudsman, and to make sure its editors "fully comply"
with the university's student-conduct codes.
The editors say that they are working to
do some of those things already, but that they are uncomfortable
having them dictated by a lease. They also note that the ad-related
provisions would deprive them of needed revenue.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
November 10, 2003
The Collegian's Demise
at Fresno State!
Amy Williams, Staff
Writer,
Bulldog Newspaper Foundation
FRESNO STATE -- The Collegian
can do things that wouldn't otherwise get done. They perform services
that are of inestimable value to the scholarly establishment --
researchers, teachers, librarians, and the rest of the university
community -- but also to the broader world of readers, and ultimately
to society itself. People working at university presses know this,
of course, but too infrequently say it.
But what if you did say it, clearly, in
a couple of dozen bullet points that specified exactly what university
presses -- and university presses alone -- are good at?
Look at the recent response to a charge
from AAUP President Willis Regier, a team composed of Douglas Armato,
Steve Cohn, and Susan Schott has done just that. The three, all
members of the AAUP Board of Directors, have assembled a document
called The Value of University Presses.
It consists of twenty-four simple, single-sentence
statements under three headings, "University Presses and Society,"
"University Presses and Scholarship," and "University
Presses in the University Community."
The talking points range in scope from
grand to modest. At the former end of the spectrum is the first
declaration: "University Presses make available to the broader
public the full range and value of research generated by university
faculty"; at the latter, the twenty-first: "University
Presses help connect the university to the surrounding community
by publishing books of local interest and hosting events for local
authors."
"When you look at university publishing
as a totality, and consider that we publish 10,000 books a year,
you realize that this is an impressive cultural entity," said
Armato, who is Director at the University of Minnesota Press. The
list of bullet points, he went on, is an attempt to make clear just
how impressive -- "to encompass everything we know about what
university presses contribute."
According to Regier, the idea for the list
was rooted in the frequent misunderstandings that arise between
university presses and the wider university community. For example,
recent episodes at the University of Arkansas and, particularly,
Iowa State University, make it clear that university publishers
need to spend more time delineating and conveying the value of their
mission.
Armato emphasized that the document's applications
are not, however, limited to the university. Intellectual and cultural
leaders, too, need to know about the increasingly dynamic role of
university presses. In his words, scholarly publishers must dispel
the notion that they are simply "fossilized recyclers of dissertations."
His point is driven home forcefully in the new talking points. While
hardly discounting the importance of work published by younger scholars.
The value of University presses emphasizes
the new roles that scholarly publishers have increasingly assumed
in recent years. See, for example, the third point: "University
presses contribute to the variety and diversity of cultural expression
at a time of global mergers and consolidation in the media industry."
University presses are, of course, highly
complex institutions. Any attempt to express every last one of their
contributions will necessarily prove reductive. But Regier, Armato,
Cohn, and Schott are justifiably enthusiastic about what their document
makes possible. After all, in a world that sometimes seems to consist
exclusively of meetings and presentations, a good set of talking
points can be an enormously effective too.
Here are just a few value-added benefits and potential
future publication uses to this university that will be lost if
the Collegian student press is shuttered at CSU Fresno:
1)The Collegian can make available to the broader public the full
range and value of research generated by university faculty.
2)The Collegian can publish the basic research and analysis that
is drawn upon by policymakers, opinion leaders, and authors of works
for the general public.
3)The Collegian can make a valuable intellectual contributtioin
to the variety and diversity of cultural expression at a time of
global mergers ansd consolidation in the media industry.
4)The Collegian can make itself amenable to the common cause with
libraries and other cultural institutions to promote engagement
with ideas and sustain a literate culture.
5) The Collegian can assist in the preservation of the distinctiveness
of local cultures through publication of works on the states and
regions where they are based.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Updated
November 17, 2003
Net Effects of the Return-to-Work,
Case Management Study on Participant Earnings and Benefit Receipt
Outcomes.
by Robert Kornfeld , Kalman Rupp
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics,
and Policy, Social Security Administration
WASHINGTON D.C. -- The Social Security Administration
(SSA) initiated Project NetWork in 1991 to test case management
as a means of promoting employment among persons with disabilities.
The demonstration, which targeted Social
Security Disability Insurance (DI) beneficiaries and Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) applicants and recipients, offered intensive
outreach, work-incentive waivers, and case management referral services.
Participation in Project NetWork was voluntary. Volunteers were
randomly assigned to the "treatment" group or the "control"
group.
Those assigned to the treatment group met
individually with a case or referral manager who arranged for rehabilitation
and employment services, helped clients develop an individual employment
plan, and provided direct employment counseling services.
Volunteers assigned to the control group
could not receive services from Project NetWork but remained eligible
for any employment assistance already available in their communities.
More!
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
November 5, 2003
Bulldog News Goes
On Ebay to highest bidder!
Amy Williams, Staff
Writer
FRESNO STATE -- The world famous university news
service at Fresno State (founded in 1958)
has been put up for sale following the announcement of the retirement
of its founder and publisher, Howard Hobbs, Ph.D., a Fresno State
alumnus and long-time supporter of the university. The Bulldog News
and five sister publications with world-wide readership are going
up for sale on Ebay. The bidding for The Bulldog News with the domain
CSUFresno.com starts at $45,000.
Dr. Hobbs and a cadre of student journalists
at Fresno State have written stories supporting and criticizing
certain university officials and athletic eligibility policies.
The online news service serves the community and students alike
and has a readership of over 1.5 million. When asked why he's divesting
himself of ownership, Hobbs was quick to say, "My phone line
has never been cut and and my tires have never been slashed. I haven't
received any threatening letters. I have many other irons in the
fire and my health isn't what it used to be."
Hobbs owns these two properties and other
widely read newspapers with national and international circulation.
You may have heard of some of the Web assets Hobbs is keeping, most
notably the Valley
Press Media Network which publishes 5 daily newspapers online
including the Daily
Republican, Fresno
Republican, Clovis
Free Press, and The
American Law review. He announced today that he wants to sell
them to the highest bidder and says he'd like to see the Bulldog
News at Fresno State continue in its fine traditions over the past
half-century.
Hobbs won't say what he paid for the Bulldog
Newspaper except to note that it was in excess of $35,000.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog
Newspaper Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
October 22, 2002
In Mickey Mouse
We Trust?
By Thomas Hobbs, Staff Writer
FRESNO
STATE -- California State University, Fresno, Foundation officials
are accusing an "unnamed" former staff accountant for
the alleged embezzlement of over $190,000 in funds. For some unexplained
reason, noone has been charged with a crime, according to the Fresno
Police Dept.
According to a University Spokesman the
loss, which dates back two years, was only discovered in the last
few days. The OMB regulations under revised Circular
A-122 require the CSU Fresno Foundation to maintain established
cost principles and undergo mandatory annual audits.
Upon visiting the CSU
Fresno Foundation's page, their link to the accounting standards
"OMB circular A-122" misdirects readers to a Walt Disney
Corp. site, curiously.
In view of the reluctance of the University
administration to publicly identify and prosecute this individual,
doubts have been raised about the administration's report of the
facts of the case. This, especially in vew of the fact that no audit
report has been made available to the press in support of University
claims.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
October 21, 2002
What They Didn't Tell
Us About the Cuts
By Thomas Hobbs, Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Bulldog
Athletics Director, Scott Johnson was in a press conference. He
was announcing cuts in Fresno State Sports when he said, "In
consultation with President Welty, I am recommending to Athletics
Corporation Board the elimination of the women's swimming and diving
team, the men's soccer team and the men's cross country and indoor
track and field teams. This is strictly a budget decision."
A major unreported issue is the changing
of the accounting standards in midstream that appears to be a principal
cause of the crisis. The CSU system introduced new reporting standards
in 2002 restricting deductions for depreciation and amortization
expense. The impact is huge, totaling close to $2.8 billion in lost
surplus to the CSU system in FY 2002.
More than likely, the timing of Governor
Davis' announcement of his $38.2 billion budget gap had a political
impact on the incoming administration. Would it be strange to learn
six months from now that budget cuts in Sacramento were merely a
political stunt by an outgoing governor as a payback for being recalled
by Swarzenegger & Company?
[Editor's
Note: The following discussion and analysis provides an overview
of the financial position and activities of the California State
University for the year ended June 30, 2002 in its entirety, including
recognized auxiliary organizations. Click
here to download the official and most recent official California
State University Audited Financial Statment and a note
on the resulting
fiscal crisis.]
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
October 10, 2003
Save Mart Center
Bond Status Questions
By
Howard E. Hobbs Ph.D., Editor & Publisher
FRESNO STATE -- Universities like Fresno State that sell tax-exempt
bonds to pay for construction of athletic venues like The Save Mart
Center and then make lucrative deals to sell the naming rights to
the facility might soon have to face the loss of purported tax-free
status of those bonds.
Then, the Internal Revenue Service quietly
issued a ruling just made public in recent days, that the privileges
gained by individual donors and corporations that purchase naming
rights to such facilities as the Save Mart Center, count as a "personal-business
use" of that property.
Tax law states that if the value of personal-business
use exceeds a certain proportion of the value of the property and
the costs of debt service on it, the bonds' tax-exempt status is
revoked.
Public institutions like California
State University, Fresno can only make deals worth up to 10
percent of the value of property and 10 percent of the amount of
debt, while most private nonprofit organizations have a maximum
of 5 percent. Of course, the rule does not apply to for-profit entities,
which cannot issue tax-exempt bonds.
Fresno State would appear to fall under
the categories of public and private institutions covered by the
decision. However, because the finding was made in a private-letter
ruling, it only settled how existing law applied to one particular
case and cannot cited at this time as precedent in other cases,
according to IRS spokesperson, Anthony Burke.
Some experts are worried about how the
IRS interpretation will affect those who bought tax-exempt bonds
to help finance the Save Mart Arena. The ruling could have a big
effect on many colleges and university athletic facilities like
Save Mart Center.
Linda B. Schakel, an expert on tax-exempt
bonds, who is president-elect of the National Association of Bond
Lawyers told reporters, when she worked for the Treasury Department
in 1997, she helped write the law on which the IRS based the private-letter
ruling, she says. "It's a little bit different than controlling
how your name appears on concessionaires' cups and janitors'
uniforms."
Joseph R. Irvine, a tax lawyer for Ohio
State University, told reporters, this week, "...any institution
that sold tax-exempt bonds to pay for any new construction should
be concerned." Most issuers, including colleges, he says, "will
see that this is the position the IRS would take on an audit."
Universities, colleges and schools often
seek o pay for new construction with tax-exempt bonds through their
local or state governments. The tax-free status of the bonds makes
them attractive to potential buyers, who would be upset if they
found out after purchasing what they were told was a tax exempt
security, to find out later that they owed back-taxes and penalties
on them after all.
Selling naming rights to the Save Mart Center also brought
in big bucks to the University. In the biggest tax bond deal of
its kind we know of, Fresno State is getting $40-million over 20
years from Save Mart Corp., a regional supermarket chain, for naming
the arena its "Save Mart Center."
But naming rights carry with them particular
effects on any tax-exempt bonds used to finance the construction,
according to tax attorney, Gregory V.
Johnson, a specialist in public finance in the Denver office of
Patton Boggs, a law firm. "It's not just putting your name
on a building, it's putting your name on a building for a business
purpose."
For example, if John Doe personally donated $20-million to
his alma mater, and, in gratitude, it named a stadium for him, the
bonds would be tax-exempt. But if his company paid the institution
$20-million to put its name on a stadium for advertising purposes,
the bonds might be taxable. Their status would depend on whether
the institution was public or private, and whether the payments
met either the 10- or 5-percent maximum, respectively.
The ruling will affect colleges more than
cities and municipalities because colleges tend to build smaller
facilities, Mr. Johnson says, explaining that the proportional value
of naming rights increases as the size and cost of facilities decrease.
Mr. Irvine believes that a naming-rights
gift for Ohio State's new arena, as an example, falls safely below
the 10-percent ceiling. The university used tax-exempt bonds to
build the facility, where its basketball and hockey teams play and
other events are held. OSU received $12.5-million in 1998 from the
Schottenstein family, which owns Value City, a national discount-store
chain, to name the facility the Value City Arena at the Jerome Schottenstein
Center.
Deborah Adishian-Astone, executive director of
auxiliary services at Fresno State, told reporters Fresno State
sold it's tax-exempt bonds to finance the Save Mart Center.
According to Treasury
Final regulations, sale of naming rights and tax exempt bonds
may not give rise to investment-type property if it is made for
a substantial business purpose.
[Editor's
Note: Go to related
tax-exemption story. Also note that according to Fresno State,
in the bond sale to fund the Save Mart Center – an unorthodox style
of collegiate financing was devised in order to obtain public funds
for the purchase of investment bonds that contractually obligate
income streams, including naming rights, corporate sponsorships,
private gifts, luxury suites seat licenses for the operation of
an athletic facility on campus. Note that these bonds were put up
as the sole source of security for the construction project. The
Bulldog News has been informed that a sponsorship arrangement between
Save Mart Supermarkets and Pepsi Bottling Group started the fund-raising
melee back in 1998. The move soon led to Pepsi’s financial backing
of the Fresno State Savemart Center following the university's strategic
switch from its former Coca-Cola vending machines on campus. Local
businessman Larry Shehadey then donated the eight-story clock tower
at the main entrance.]
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
October 7, 2003
CALIFORNIA HIGHER ED
BUDGET CUTS
By Howard Hobbs PhD, Editor & Publisher
FRESNO STATE - In the news, California
State lawmakers have announced today another cut in the University
of California's budget by 8 percent, or $248 million from last year.
Worse yet, state funds for the California
State University System fell by more than $345 million. The state's
community colleges have been cut by 9.4 percent, a hefty $240 million.
In passing the 2003-2004 state budget, Sacramento
will delay by about a year the 10th UC campus at Merced, Calif.
This in spite of enormous graduating high school seniors.
Meanwhile, the California Community College
chancellor, Dr. Thomas J. Nussbaum has recently announced his plans
to retire in January 2004. A replacement has not yet been announced.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Updated
September 20, 2003
University Presidents’ Role
in NCAA Eligibility Legislation
By Dan Covell & Carol A. Barr
[Abstract from the Journal of Higher Education,
Vol. 72, 2001]
“A
college which is interested in producing professional athletes is
not an educational institution.” Robert Hutchins, president, University
of Chicago. [1980]
FRESNO STATE -- America is different. Its
universities are unique in their efforts to please many constituencies,
prospective students, donors, legislators, the general public. The
growth of intercollegiate sports aptly illustrates the strengths
and weaknesses of a constituency-oriented system of higher education.
With enthusiastic support from students,
alumni, and even government officials, our colleges have developed
athletic programs that have brought great satisfaction to thousands
of athletes and millions of spectators.
Few aspects of college life have done so
much to win the favor of the public, build the loyalties of alumni,
and engender lasting memories in the minds of student athletes.
College sport is what it is because the
American public wants it so bad.... Now why the public wants it
so much is a question for the public. Right? These
statements identify an elemental conflict between academics and
athletics that exists in American higher education; that is, the
belief that the simultaneous institutional pursuits of rigorous
academics and "big time" intercollegiate athletic programs
are difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile.
Many critics of American higher education
note that our institutions are beset with contradictory and unrelated
activities both academic and nonacademic in nature. The transformation
of American higher education over the last century has led to criticism
of academic activities--such as research funded by for-profit corporations--that
often contribute little to students who fund the institution, and
an unchecked academic balkanization on campuses has created a separation
between undergraduate and graduate studies, arts and sciences, and
liberal and professional learning that has meant confusion about
the specific missions of specific institutions.
Combine this with a current push for distance
learning fueled by technological advances and the need to reach
more diverse populations of students to maintain institutional and
programmatic viability, and critics cite that it has become nearly
impossible to define precisely what is meant by higher education.
This debate is made more complex when nonacademic
components are also assessed in terms of their congruence with the
mission of higher education. The adoption of the Cambridge/Oxford
residential college model led to the incorporation of many nonacademic
components within the traditional American higher education system,
including intercollegiate athletics.
This in part has led to the development
of what Derek Bok, president, Harvard University, called the "constituency-oriented
system of higher education," where schools use athletics
and other nonacademic activities to foster a sense of community
with students, alumni, and the general public.
While the constituency-based system contains
numerous potentially contradictory elements worthy of exploration,
it is intercollegiate athletics that is often cited as a particularly
aberrant aspect of American higher education, particularly at Division
I National
Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) institutions. The inevitable
response of critics of the constituent system to this charge is,
what do such activities have to do with the mission of higher education?
The simultaneous pursuits of athletic success,
related profits, and institutional academic integrity, say these
critics, cannot be reconciled. To them, this is the glaring weakness
in the constituent system. Supporters argue the strengths of the
system, which the popular appeal of nonacademic activities are a
vital complement to academic components and in keeping with the
founding ethos of American higher education.
Efforts to wed the athletic and the academic
attempt to deflect this criticism of the wedding of the athletic
and the commercial that is inherent in the constituent system. According
to Helman (1989), this ideal notion of intercollegiate athletics
and the student-athlete is legitimized through eligibility rules,
which provide "standards that tether commercial athletics to
the educational purposes of higher education". If Division
I programs are to meet the standards set by the NCAA that demand
this tethering (see below), then the programs must be maintained
and legitimized through such eligibility rules.
The question that arises from this charge
is to whom within the academy this responsibility of tethering will
ultimately fall. It is in the realm of academic tethering that school
presidents, the individuals who are seen to have ultimate control
over all components of the campus, have moved to the fore. When
first student-athletes and then faculty oversight groups proved
unable to deal effectively with the problems associated with intercollegiate
athletics and the demands of constituents, many school presidents
saw it as their role as institutional CEOs, those managers who serve
as the public face of the institution and the ultimate internal
decision maker, to address these issues. Over
time, certain groups of presidents have come to lead the associated
public debate and NCAA organizational push for association-wide
initial eligibility standards.
Many other major concerns regarding Division
I athletics--pay for play, controlling agent tampering, recruiting
abuses by coaches, boosters and others, the recurring specter of
gambling and point-shaving--have not elicited the same sort of demands
for and responses of presidential leadership, because many presume
that these are strictly "athletic" issues to be dealt
with by professional athletic administrators.
In an attempt to understand the roles of
presidents in maintaining congruence within the constituency-based
American higher education system, this article provides a detailed
chronology of presidential efforts to deal with the conflicts related
to the tethering of academic mission to athletic pursuits through
the development of NCAA initial eligibility academic legislation.
Such legislation impacts recruiting and
admissions, the ultimate sport product on the field and the court,
and the charge to tether commercial athletics to the educational
purposes of higher education and to preserve the viability of the
intercollegiate athletic enterprise.
In response to criticisms that "big
time" athletics has no place on campus and has no relation
to institutional academic missions, the bylaws of the NCAA have
been crafted to require that intercollegiate athletics be administered
under an institution's academic rubric.
The NCAA publishes annually the purposes
of the association under Article 1 of its Constitution. The first
stated purpose is, "To initiate, stimulate and improve intercollegiate
athletics programs for student-athletes and to promote and develop
educational leadership, physical fitness, athletics excellence and
athletics participation as a recreational pursuit."
Also included as stated purposes are, "To
encourage its members to adopt eligibility rules to comply with
satisfactory standards of scholarship, sportsmanship and amateurism,"
and "To legislate, through bylaws or by resolutions of a Convention,
upon the subject of general concern to the members related to the
administration." NCAA bylaws do not dictate whom schools may
admit, as illustrated in Bylaw 2.5, "The Principle of Sound
Academic Standards," which reads: Intercollegiate athletic
programs shall be maintained as a vital component of the educational
program, and student-athletes shall be an integral part of the student
body.
The admission, academic standing and academic
progress of the student-athletes shall be consistent with the policies
and standards adopted by the institution for the student body in
general. An institution may admit any student, but the student may
or may not be eligible to compete in intercollegiate athletics,
depending on whether that student meets the initial academic eligibility
criteria set by the NCAA membership.
Division I schools must also recognize
"the dual objective in its athletics program of serving both
the university or college community participants, student body,
faculty-staff, alumni and the general public community, area, state,
nation, a verification of Bok's constituency-based assessment.
[Editor's Note: The California State
University is the largest system of senior higher education in the
nation, with 23 campuses, nearly 407,000 students and 44,000 faculty
and staff. Since the system was created in 1961, it has awarded
about 2 million degrees. The CSU mission is to provide high-quality,
affordable education to meet the ever-changing needs of the people
of California. For more information on The CSU, visit www.calstate.edu.]
|
|
Sept. 19, 2003
What it costs taxpayers to
provide you with an education at
California State University, Fresno
By Edward Davidian, Staff Writer
FRESNO -- Sacramento
lawmakers cut the 2003-2004 University of California budget by $248,000,000
last week. Then went on to cut funds for the California State University
system by $345,200,000. Community colleges were cut by $250,000,000.
In the face of these drastic cuts
present salary levels are on the block, as well. At present, average
full-time pay for a professor is $108,180; assoc. professors $ 69,
534.
The graduation rate form Fresno State
is only 42%. Catch this, the total costs of operation of the statewide
CSU System is a whopping $15,106,121,000 annually.
The number of bachelor’s degrees awarded
annually has increased over the past 3 decades, climbing from nearly
800,000 in 1969-1970 to over 1.2 million in 1999–20001 (U.S. Department
of Education 2002)...More!
|
|
Sept. 11, 2003
Fresno State Hit With Ten
NCAA Rule Violations
Tom Hobbs, Staff Writer
FRESNO - Men's Basketball
is still trying to deal with the implications of the NCAA investigation
findings announced this week. FSU was placed on four years probation
on Wednesday. This, on top of self-imposed sanctions by the university
in December of 2002, is a morale-buster for the Fresno State's Men's
Basketball program.
The NCAA cited numerous violations of bylaws
governing academic fraud, recruiting, eligibility, financial aid
(including awards and benefits), extra benefits, amateurism, coaching
limitations and playing and practice seasons legislation, including
a "lack of appropriate institutional controls" by the
program's administrators.
Because of FSU's self-imposed sanctions, which included
a ban on last season's men's basketball postseason play and the
elimination of three men's basketball scholarships, the NCAA imposed
probation will be retroactive to December, 2002.
Also, the NCAA mandated that Fresno State
return 90 percent of the money earned during its appearance in the
2000 NCAA tournament and that the team's participation in the tournament
be expunged from the record ...More!
|
|
September 9, 2003
Hitler's Filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl Dead
at 101
Associated Press News Release
BERLIN (AP) Leni Riefenstahl,
the legendary filmmaker reviled and revered for movies she made
about Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich, has died one of the last
confidantes of the Nazi dictator. She was 101...More!
|
|
August 27, 2003
California Schools
Academic Scores Hit Bottom
By Amy Williams Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- It appears
that California teachers have little effect on students' academic
performance of elementary, middle, and school students.
A California state study released today by the Public Policy Institute
of California (PPIC) reports that students’ peers have a stronger
effect on their achievement than the qualifications of their teachers
or the size of their classes...More!
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
August 1, 2003
Krueger Killed Three
Dumped by UC Berkeley
Hired by National University
By Amy Williams Staff Writer
FRESNO STATE -- Dr. Paul
Krueger, the Penn State University prof who was to be hired by National
University in San Diego learned yesterday that his job offer rescinded.
Why? National just learned that when Krueger was a teenager in 1965,
he and a friend killed three fishermen with a rifle. Krueger, at
the time, was a runaway, according to local news accounts.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
January 16, 2003
Massive Budget Cuts Leave
State University Finance
in Shambles!
By Kim Saito, Contributor
WASHINGTON, D.C -- Nearly
600,000 students are immediately confronting 10-15 percent fee increases
at all University of California (UC) and California State University
(Cal State) campuses as they return from winter break. The unprecedented
midyear action came as the result of emergency meetings held last
month by higher education officials responding to Governor Gray
Davis’s initial announcements about the state’s projected $34.8
billion deficit over the next 18 months.
Just how big is the state’s deficit? As
Herb Wesson, speaker of the State Assembly, remarked, “That’s
a hole so deep and so vast that even if we fired every single person
on the state payroll—every park ranger, every college professor
and every Highway Patrol officer—we would still be more than $6
billion short.”
The increases took effect January 3, 2003
at all Cal State University campuses and UC Berkeley, which is on
semester system. Fees will go up at all other UC campuses, which
operate on a quarterly system, in March 2003. The last time fees
were raised was in 1994.
On December 6, Governor Davis issued proposals
for midyear revisions to the 2002-03 state budget to coincide with
the opening of a Special Session that he called to address the fiscal
crisis. Twelve days later Davis adjusted his shortfall estimate
to almost $35 billion, almost 45 percent of the total level of $77
billion in the General Fund spending on all programs approved in
the 2002-03 Budget Act. He then proposed an emergency $1.734 billion
midyear spending reduction in Proposition 98 programs, affecting
education.
If California were a country, it would
be the fifth-largest economy in the world, surpassing France and
Italy. Included among its 35 million residents, making it the most
populous state, are some of the nation’s richest and poorest. During
the dot.com boom, the number of overnight millionaires and multimillionaires
exploded. As a result, the state also grew suddenly wealthier from
corporate taxes and revenues from employee stock options from all
the high-tech companies based in Silicon Valley and the greater
San Francisco area.
Over the recent period, several new campuses
were built by Cal State and UC; new public schools went up; class
sizes were reduced; teacher pay increased; public health facilities
expanded; new roads were approved; and about 40,000 public service
employees were added to the state payroll.
However, with the convergence now of a
collapsing stock market, the energy crisis and the high-tech bubble
bursting, state revenues from capital gains and stock option taxes
fell over the past two years from $17 billion to $5 billion, accounting
for roughly half of the current deficit. But deficit spending is
prohibited under the state’s constitution.
During her address to the State Assembly,
legislative analyst Elizabeth Hill said the problem goes beyond
the immediate deficit of the next year and a half. A recent report
says the state faces deficits of between $12 billion and $15 billion
annually for at least the next five years. Hill called the governor’s
cuts “credible” but also noted that they contain “virtually no meaningful
reductions” in law enforcement, including prisons.
California used to be the national model
for accessibility and affordability to higher education for working
class and middle class students. But today—with soaring enrollment,
impacted classes and now substantially higher fees—a college diploma
is becoming out of reach for hundreds of thousands of young people.
On December 16, the board of California
State University—the nation’s largest public university system,
dubbed “the people’s university”—voted to raise fees. Protesting
students outside the meeting where the decision was made held up
signs reading, “Adding fees is not the answer” and “CSU students
are the working class of California.”
The state universities are mandated to
admit the top third of all high school graduates. Its more prestigious
counterpart, the UC, is required by the state to accept the top
12 percent. The Policy Analysis for California Education, a Stanford-based
education policy research group, projects an additional 100,000
students will enter the CSU by 2010, while the UC faces a 40 percent
jump in students by the end of the decade.
CSU Chancellor Charles Reed said the system
faces losing $60 million from its annual $3 billion budget and may
be forced to consider salary reductions, hiring freezes, layoffs
and even more fee increases. This year enrollment hit a record 406,896
students at its 23 campuses. For state residents, the increase raises
fees $72 per semester for undergraduates, from $1,428 to $1,572
per year, and for graduate students, from $1,506 to $1,734 per year.
University of California will increase
its fees by $135 for its 180,000 students. That amounts to an 11.2
percent annual increase for undergraduates and 11.8 percent for
graduates. Graduate students will be charged even more—from $150
to $400 a quarter—in addition to the system-wide increase. These
fees affect students in a range of professional programs, including
business, law, veterinary medicine, optometry, pharmacy and nursing.
“This year is a problem, but next year
could be a catastrophe,” CSU Chancellor Charles Reed told the San
Jose Mercury News. To help the neediest students stay in school,
both systems will put one-third of the money raised by fee increases
directly into university financial aid. The state-funded scholarship
program, Cal Grants, is expected to cover fee increases for needy
students receiving those grants.
California’s community college system of
two-year public institutions is composed of 108 colleges statewide
and serves more than 2.9 million students, representing the largest
system of higher education in the world. Because tuition and fees
are inexpensive, hundreds of thousands of working class students
go to community colleges and later transfer to the CSU and UC systems.
Governor Davis’s December 6 proposal for
midyear cuts included $215 million from the state’s community colleges.
He proposed a 3.66 percent across-the-board reduction to all line
items in the Budget Act, including general apportionments affecting
K-12 and community colleges. These total $97,457,000. Additional
loss of resources for general purposes would occur due to an estimated
shortfall in property tax revenues of $37 million, for which there
will be no “backfill” from state funds.
Finally, Davis proposed cutting general
apportionments by $80 million for what the Department of Finance
calls “estimated non-compliant credit instruction claimed in 2001-02
by community college districts for concurrently enrolled K-12 students.”
In other words, city college classes enrolling public school students,
usually high school level, will not receive funding.
Although City College Chancellor Nussbaum
has decided not to immediately follow the CSU and UC plan to hike
fees, emergency committees have been set up to prepare for future
cuts by Governor Davis in his full spending plan for the 2003-04
fiscal year. All campus administrators have been instructed to identify
areas that will have to be cut.
When all other cuts are included, a total
of $1.9 billion could be slashed from public schools and colleges
just this school year—or about $300 per student.
All of this money is taken from the minimum-funding
base guaranteed by Proposition 98, which sets formulas to calculate
this amount. Education accounts for about half of the budgetary
general fund, where the most painful cuts will be. Other cuts would
affect programs including principal training, high-risk youth projects,
college preparation tests, dropout prevention and education technology.
Compounding the impact of the dot.com collapse,
the state’s financial structure was significantly altered by an
event 25 years ago: the anti-tax movement that saw the passage of
Proposition 13, a ballot measure that permanently capped property
taxes.
The long-term effect of the measure has
been the continuous erosion of what was once one of the country’s
model educational systems as well as the destruction of social programs.
The disparity between rich and poor schools has widened. The state
has been relying on income tax for most of its revenue: in 1970,
it was 18.5 percent; today, it is 50 percent.
California’s schools, which now rank 38th
in the nation in per capita spending, will be utterly devastated.
There are six million public school pupils and 268,000 teachers,
represented by the California Teachers Association, throughout the
state.
Under-resourced inner-city areas like South
Central LA will feel the biggest impact. According to independent.co.uk,
even schools in wealthier middle class areas have been asked to
lay off 25 percent of their teaching staff, as well as janitors,
gardeners, nursing staff and counselors. There is also talk of firing
up to 35,000 teachers.
Becky Zoglman, a spokeswoman for the California
Teachers Association, told the Sacramento Bee, “These cuts are going
to directly impact students in every classroom in California. It
will be devastating, and coming midyear, it’s going to be impossible
for schools to do.”
Asked if schools, community colleges and
universities might reopen negotiations with employee unions to reduce
salaries, Education Secretary Kerry Mazzoni said she “wouldn’t rule
it out.” She said, “The Governor has indicated everything is on
the table.”
Officials say that class size reduction
(CSR), which limits K-3rd grade classrooms to 20 students, could
be the next victim of the budget crisis. The Desert Sun spoke to
the superintendent of Palm Springs Unified School District William
Diedrich, who said, “It’s unpopular, but class-size reduction is
something that has to be on the table.” His district could face
cutting as much as $5 million. The last time there was a budget
crunch, cuts were made in supplies, maintenance, secretarial time
and after-school programs. “Since 85 percent of our budget is people,
we know it’s going to be in that area.”
Delaine Eastin, the state Superintendent
of Education, said, “You’ll see class sizes move up. You’ll see
a shortage of materials. You’ll see an absence of after-school programs....
They won’t be buying any more library books. They won’t be buying
textbooks, and they’ll either discontinue busing or charge parents
for busing.”
Already, the Long Beach and Pasadena school
districts have imposed a freeze on hiring new teachers. Projected
current-year cuts in Long Beach of $28 million will coincide with
contract negotiations for the district’s 4,000 teachers. The district
is calling for $4 million in cuts in medical benefits and a mandatory
weekly one-hour tutoring session without compensation.
Irvine World News reported that at a recent
meeting of the Irvine school board Superintendent Dean Waldfogel
characterized the proposed state cuts as “stunning in scope and
magnitude” and a “fiscal calamity” for the district. About $4.3
million will have to be cut between now and July from the district’s
$173.4 million budget. That $4.3 million is equivalent to 100 annual
salaries of $43,000 each, about one-fifth of all classified salaries
for the year and equals the cost of about half of all books and
supplies for the year.
Vacant nonessential staff positions will
not be filled; stipends and consultant expenditures will cease;
travel at district expense and equipment purchases will be postponed
or cancelled; staff overtime will cease; and every purchase and
expenditure will be scrutinized.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
January 15, 2003
About Madden Library's
Massive Budget Cut
Andrtew Albanse, Library Journal
FRESNO STATE -- Effect
of midyear reductions unclear, but hiring, serials, and projects
likely to be targeted, even as campuses grow. California Gov. Gray
Davis has proposed a whopping $74M in midyear cuts to the University
of California (UC) and another $59.6M in cuts to the California
State University (CSU) system.
Meanwhile, California's budget deficit is predicted
to soar to as much as $30B—a staggering amount that would equal
roughly 25 percent of the state's entire budget.
The proposed reductions will be discussed by
the state legislature in January, though the amount of the cuts
could change. "There are immense challenges ahead for the California
State University," said CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed. He
added that CSU officials had prepared for midyear cuts, although
"next year could be a catastrophe."
Although it was unclear initially how library
services would be affected, both UC and CSU libraries will certainly
face an additional squeeze. CSU started this academic year with
a $43M budget cut, plus $22.8M in unfunded costs for things such
as health benefit premiums and salaries.
For libraries, the previous round of cuts
resulted in hiring freezes, some serials cancellations, and delays
in much-needed projects and contracts. The additional $59.6M decrease
brings this year's total to $125M spread across the CSU system's
23 campuses.
At the University of California, $20M of
the proposed $74M will be taken from "administration and libraries,"
with each of UC's nine campuses to decide locally how they will
meet the decreases. Ironically, the steep cuts come just weeks after
California voters approved $19B in bonds over the next 30 years
for education (see News , LJ 12/02, p. 16).
Despite this voter support, the new reductions
will have a grave effect on library services at some CSU libraries,
as the system is facing a huge increase in enrollments. At CSU Fresno,
a seesaw. Things will get worse before they get better in California,
said Michael Gorman, dean of library services at
CSU Fresno. But they will eventually get better.
The midyear cuts, Gorman said, were largely planned
for and the effect on the library at Fresno State should be minimal.
The cut will result in an additional five percent from his budget
this year, meaning that some temp workers may not be retained and
a position may be lost to attrition.
Materials have already been purchased, so acquisitions
will not be affected. "It's a short-term catastrophe,"
Gorman said. "But the next cut, for next year, is rumored to
be just dreadful," and Gorman is preparing for "a big
cut, possibly ten percent."
Like other library administrators across
California universities, Gorman is bracing for massive cuts to book-buying
and serials acquisitions, among other measures, including possible
reduced hours and staff. The cuts put Gorman in a rather strange
position, since he is both planning for huge cuts and a new library.
"The deficit situation is worse than
it's been since World War II," said Gorman, "but as an
institution, CSU is so much stronger."
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
~Reprise~
October 15, 1960
Moral Imperatives
Campus Warfare
by Howard E. Hobbs B.A., Editor & Publisher
Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State
(updated October 1, 1979)
FRESNO
STATE -- According to FSC Social Science Prof. Karl Falk (at
FSC since 1938), " Fresno city government and the urban
renewal project have nothing to do with moral standards or values."
This writer's interpretation of local urban renewal initiatives
is that never were means and ends in sharper conflict.
One of the latest social scientists
to pursue the line of moral inquiry in city planning is social theorist
Jane Jacobs. Best known for her devastating critique of urban planning,
Jacobs has long analyzed cities as problems in organized complexity
and drawn on metaphors to explain, among other things, the role
of money as a feedback-carrying mechanism and the rationale for
political secession..
Her latest offering,
however, goes beyond the use of metaphors as heuristic devices and
is better understood as a search for universal principles that characterize
complex systems, both natural and human made.
Prof. Jacob's premise
is that human beings exist wholly within nature as part of the natural
order in every respect – a statement that is likely to generate
much controversy in some FSC Campus faculty offices.
In taking that stance, Jacobs seems to distance
herself from urban renewal economists, industrialists, politicians,
and others who believe that it is possible for human beings to circumvent
and outdo the moral order of the community.
The main question
Jacobs tries to answer is the same one recently raised in FSC campus
Economics classes: Does economic life of cities obey the same rules
as those governing natural systems?
This writer's answer is straightforward:
I'm convinced that economic life is determined by those processes
and principles we didn't invent and can't transcend, whether we
like that or not, and that the more we learn of these processes
including moral and ethical conduct by all concerned citizens, and
the better we respect them, the better our City will get along.
Jacobs' discusses such processes as urban
development, expansion, self-refueling, evading collapse, fitness
for survival and unpredictability.
Development, whether
in nature or in urban economies, is best viewed as a open-ended
process which most often differentiates its processes from further
differentiations which inevitably emerge. Such development depends,
however, on numerous, various, and intricate co-development relationships.
For example, tool making
began with four existing generalities: sticks, stones, bones and
fire. Our ancestors then differentiated through innovation a moral
system that required the fusion of other, originally unrelated,
innovations leading to what we now think of as forms of urban renewal.
Expansion upon human experience
is a system of means and ends. It is a system for recapturing, using,
and passing around the cumulative consequences of the diverse use
and reuse of the dynamic energy of a diversified city that will
generate much more local expansion from a new business venture than
a small town, much like a well developed forest's ecosystem will
convert more sunlight into biomass than a desert. The refuelment
of growing cities, unlike their initial start, depends more on replacing
imports than generating new exports.
Jacobs' book contains ingenious insight,
in my opinion. Her case for a diversified urban economy rather than
specialization has been the subject of a heated debate in the urban
economics and economic geography courses here in Fresno State College
Social Science Division lecture halls in the past weeks.
If this writer were permitted
to, he would recast the discussion in light of Jacobs' theory
of the benefits of accumulating human capital and its beneficial
effect for environmental preservation. It is an attack on urban
sprawl with a moral aim to have reduced suburban growth to such
an extent that will result in virtually no negative impact on the
conservation of remaining Fresno County wildlife environs.
Perhaps things would have been different.
But, as it happened, the official Fresno State public archives are
witness to the following entries as they actually happened to Karl
Leonard Falk and a frightful history of public opinion and personnel
issues gone to the dogs under Professor Falk.. There is also significant
information about the public opinion surrounding Falk’s actions
even as president of the university as well as the protests that
ensued in response to his administrative policies and public unrest
that followed wherever Karl Falk turned up.
For example, at three o’clock on
Friday, December 4, 1970, it is recorded that the tension and distrust
of the College administration increased exponentially. The dean
of the School of Humanities, Ralph Rea, accompanied by campus policemen,
marched into the English Department and hand delivered letters of
dismissal to Eugene Zumwalt, the department’s chairman, and
Roger Chittick, the assistant chairman.
The men and the department’s secretaries
were then forcibly removed from the office. Another police officer
and a maintenance man entered and began sealing the office and its
contents, padlocking filing cabinets and barricading the entrance
with metal plates.
Policemen also guarded the door. Rea continued
exerting control of the English Department as he was made the acting
chairman, replacing Zumwalt. In an effort to calm what the administration
thought was an ideologically radical faculty, Rea altered faculty
roles, fired instructors, and changed programs within the department.
The Karl Falk Campus Unrest collection
measures 1.75 linear feet and dates from 1965 to 1979 and undated.
The collection is arranged in five series: Administrations, Ethnic
minorities, Faculty and student activism, Other universities, and
Policies and reports.
It primarily covers unrest that took place
on the campus of Fresno State College but also contains information
about unrest around the state, country, and world. This information
was collected over time by the University Archives from various
sources.
The Administrations series (1967-1979)
provides detailed information about the administrations that were
in power during the period of campus unrest on the Fresno State
campus. This specifically includes records relating to presidents
Frederic Ness, Karl Falk, and Norman Baxter.
The series is arranged in the order of
their presidencies. The Frederic Ness subseries primarily covers
personnel issues that his administration dealt with during his presidency,
with specific details about the dismissals of Marvin Jackman (Marvin
X) and Robert Mezey.
There are also records related to Ness’s
resignation. The Karl Falk material deals primarily with public
opinion and personnel issues, including the demotion of Dale Burtner.
There is also significant information about the public opinion surrounding
Falk’s actions as president of the university as well as the
protests that ensued in response to his administrative policies.
The Norman Baxter section includes information
about how Baxter dealt with personnel issues, protests that took
place on campus and in the community, and public opinion concerning
In the 1960s, a time characterized by anti-war protests and the
Civil Rights Movement, college campuses around the world began to
take part in widespread political and social activism.
In 1968, Fresno State College (now California
State University, Fresno), became another player in this political
struggle as its campus was transformed from a traditional, primarily
agricultural and teacher’s college, into one in which conservative
and liberal factions openly and publicly fought, both through the
administrative structure of the university and through campus-wide
protests, which often turned violent.
Campus unrest at Fresno State began in
1968 when Frederic Ness, the president of the university, chose
not to retain English faculty member Robert Mezey in spite of a
fervent recommendation from both the English Department and Dale
Burtner, the dean of the School of Arts and Sciences.
Mezey had become a source of controversy
on the campus and in the larger community when, in November of 1967,
he was invited to speak at the “Panel on Pot,”a debate
and discussion about marijuana. During the presentation, Mezey commented
that marijuana had not been proven harmful and that the laws against
its consumption were unjust.
After these statements were made public,
and often misinterpreted as an endorsement for drug use, complaints
about Mezey’s liberal and unlawful politics began to pour
into Ness’s office and The Bulldog Newspaper at Fresno State,
and The Fresno Bee.
After Ness terminated Mezey’s employment,
student and faculty protests began. They continued as Ness released
a prominent Black Muslim instructor, Marvin Jackman (Marvin X).
His termination brought on more protests.
The publicity and scandal associated with
these cases led to Ness’s resignation in the fall of 1969.
Addinhg fuel to the fire, on October 28, 1969, Karl Falk was appointed
as acting president.
After only five days, Falk announced a
massive realignment of the college structure. Dale Burtner, the
dean of the School of Arts and Sciences, was reassigned and replaced
with Phillip Walker. Harold Walker, the executive vice president,
was reassigned and replaced with James Fikes.
These reassignments once again caused a
rift in the campus community, resulting in even more protests. Falk
also instigated layoffs and curtailing of funds in the Experimental
College, the Ethnic Studies Program and the Educational Opportunities
Program.
These changes resulted in peaceful as well
as violent student activism. Protests continued and began to be
connected with larger societal issues, including the Vietnam War.
With the campus in an uproar, the search began for a permanent administrator
to relieve Falk of his duties.
On July 14, 1970, Norman Baxter was inaugurated
as the president of Fresno State College. His presidency was marked
by the cancellation of the La Raza Studies program and campus unrest
in response to his administrative policies. The Student Senate,
in a vote of nineteen to four, administered a vote of “no
confidence”in Baxter’s ability to run the school.
At three o’clock on Friday, December
4, 1970, the tension and distrust of the Baxter administration increased
exponentially. The dean of the School of Humanities, Ralph Rea,
accompanied by campus policemen, marched into the English Department
and hand delivered letters of dismissal to Eugene Zumwalt, the department’s
chairman, and Roger Chittick, the assistant chairman.
The men and the department’s secretaries
were then forcibly removed from the office. Another police officer
and a maintenance man entered and began sealing the office and its
contents, padlocking filing cabinets and barricading the entrance
with metal plates. Policemen also guarded the door.
Rea continued exerting control of the English Department as he was
made the acting chairman, replacing Zumwalt. In an effort to calm
what the administration thought was an ideologically radical faculty,
Rea altered faculty roles, fired instructors, and changed programs
within the department.
Comment
©1958-2003 Bulldog Newspaper Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Notable
Fresno
State alums are among the most widely read writers, editors, the
best known teachers, thinkers, business people, accomplished artists,
world explorers and community leaders.
Among our distinguished
friends and colleagues include:
Paul O'Neill, CEO and chairman of Alcoa,
Secretary of the Treasury
Bill
Jones, former California Secretary of State
Dr. Joseph Crowley, President Emeritus,
University of Nevada
Joy Covey, Former Chief Strategy Officer,
Amazon.com
Kenny
Guinn, Governor of Nevada
Col.
Rick Douglas Husband, mission commander, shuttle Columbia
Marvin Baxter, Justice, California Supreme
Court
Manny Mashouf,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, bebe fashions
Gary
Soto, acclaimed poet, essayist, and fiction writer
Joe Cafaro,
Cafaro Cellars, Napa Valley, California
Tammy Savage,
Manager of Business Development, Microsoft
Col. Steven Nagel, NASA Astronaut
Emily Kuroda, Award-Winning Actress
Cruz Bustamante,
California Lieutenant Governor
Roberta Spear,
Award-Winning Poet
Prof. Wendell Bell, Yale University's Graduate
Studies Director
Sid
Craig, CEO, Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board of Jenny
Craig, Inc
Lee
P. Brown, former Mayor of Houston, former New York
Police Commissioner
Roy Christopher, Emmy Award winning set
designer
Sherley Anne Williams, Author, National
Book Nominee, Emmy Award Winner
Trent Dilfer, 2001 Super Bowl Winning
Quarterback
Ezunial Burts, President - Los Angeles Chamber
of Commerce
Sarah
Reyes, California Assemblymember
Charles Poochigian,
California State Senator
Nat
DiBuduo, President, Allied Grape Growers of California
Geoffrey
Gamble, President, Montana State Univ.
Verna L.
Allen, Exec. Director Arizona Commission for Postsecondary
Education
Jon
Gallinetti, Brig. Genwral, Assistant Wing Commander, US Marine
Corps
Jack
Cole, Winemaker for the Charles Krug Winery
David Townsend,
Pres of Townsend Raimundo Besler & Usher Public Relations
Larry
S. Dickenson, Senior VP Sales, Boeing
Kirk
D. Grimes, Exec. of Energy & Chemicals, Fluor Corp.
Jim
Costa, former California State Senator.
Howard Hobbs, PhD,
USC, Ford Fndtn, Hoover Inst., Writer &
Editor, US Marines
Alex
A. Martinez, Deputy CAO, San Diego County
Jeff
Tedford, Head Football Coach, University of California
Robert
Hanashiro, USA Today Photographer
Dennis
Morgigno, Station Manager, Channel 4, San Diego
Armen A.
Alchian, Emeritus Professor, Founder of the "UCLA Tradition"
in Economics
|
Stebbins
Dean's Tarnished Brass [07/25/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- The CEO of the Fresno Chamber of Commerce has taken
his place in history among the high-profile Fresno liars of all
time. |
|
Ethical
Journalism Practices [06/26/2003]
BERKELEY -- Let’s talk about changes in the ethics of journalism.
The century began with the Yellow Press, which is portrayed in most
history books as being ethically challenged. |
|
Moral
Education Abstracts on Character [06/16/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Throughout the history of American education there
have appeared discerning movements which have redefined and redirected
and in numerous ways made good our fundamental commitment to democracy. |
|
College
Newspaper Fight Lands in Courthouse
[06/16/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Finding a sponsor to underwrite development of a
new 18,000 seat Event Center on the CSU-Fresno campus is still in
a tail spin as the SaveMart Supermarket and Pepsi deal is taking
a lot of heat. |
|
Fresno
State Officials Named in Cheating Slam! [06/09/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Documents made public today in NCAA letters, link
former Fresno State adviser to academic fraud. |
|
Save
Mart Center Tax Exemption Under Fire
[06/07/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Finding a sponsor to underwrite development of a
new 18,000 seat Event Center on the CSU-Fresno campus is still in
a tail spin as the SaveMart Supermarket and Pepsi deal is taking
a lot of heat. |
|
Annual
Father's Day Fly-In Chandler Field
[06/06/2003]
FRESNO -- Computer problems can leave you feeling helpless. When
yours breaks, can you rely on a professional to correctly find the
problem? |
|
Stanford
Professor Named Social Science Dean
[06/01/2003]
MERCED, CA. -- Kenji Hakuta, Ph.D., is an experimental
psychologist by training, a teacher and researcher by profession,
and a builder of bridges by nature. |
|
International
SARS Health Alert [05/22/2003]
Sars
is still spreading! The full text of all articles in the New England
Journal of Medicine collection on the severe acute respiratory syndrome
(SARS) is provided free. |
|
Computer
Repair Investigation [05/21/2003]
FRESNO -- Computer problems can leave you feeling helpless. When
yours breaks, can you rely on a professional to correctly find the
problem? |
|
Burning
Questions Remain [05/20/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Emergency Traffic Advisory: University Police asked
anyone coming to the campus this morning to avoid Barstow and Cedar
Ave. approaches from the north side. A fire at an off-campus student
apartment community has caused a traffic hazard. |
Parable
of the Cave [400 B.C.]
ATHENS, Greece -- I said, let me show in a figure how far
our nature is enlightened or unenlightened. |
|
More
Fraud Allegations Fresno State Sanctions
[05/06/2003]
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) -- Fresno State will formally respond to the
NCAA's investigation into academic fraud violations by the men's
basketball team. |
|
Charitable
Choices
in the Post-Welfare Era [04/26/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Congregations and faith-based organizations have
become key participants in America's welfare revolution. Recent
legislation has expanded the social welfare role of religious communities,
thus revealing a pervasive lack of faith in purely economic responses
to poverty. |
|
|
Honor
Award Goes To Madden Library Dean [04/07/2003]
FRESNO STATE -- Micharel Gorman, Dean of Library Services at California
State University in Fresno, was elected to the Library Board at
the ALA midwinter meeting in Philadelphia earlier this year. |
|
Stanford
Anti-War Activities Clash [04/02/2003]
WASHINGTON -- As student antiwar activists work to make their case
against war persuasive to ambivalent classmates, the leaders of
a Stanford University peace group have launched a different kind
of campaign--to reform a conservative think tank on campus with
dubious ties to the Bush Administration. |
|
~ Facsimile ~
February 24, 1938
The Common Good
Before the Individual Good
By Karl Leonard Falk, Foreign Student, University of Berlin
BERLIN -- We ask that the government
undertake the obligation of providing Germany's citizens with adequate
opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities
of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests
of the community, but must take place within its confines and be
for the good of all.
Therefore, University of Berlin students
demand an end to the power of the financial interests. We demand
the greatest possible consideration of every capable and industrious
citizen in the attainment of higher education and the achievement
of a post of leadership. The government must provide an all-around
enlargement of our system of public education at government expense
of gifted students of poor parents.
The government must undertake the improvement
of the physical education of youth and to combat the materialistic
spirit within and without us. We are convinced that a permanent
recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation
of the common good before the individual good by the triumph of
the will.
©1958-2004 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
|
|
Hounds
of War Unleashed on Baghdad!
[02/21/2003]
WASHINGTON -
The George W.
Bush administration has apparently begun moving along a broad front
to pound Iraq with a deadly first strike that may cast the world
into major economic disruption by early next week. |
|
|
|
September 27, 1998
Inventing the Bulldog News Page
Bulldog Newspaper At Fresno State
Links to statements of Intenet architectural principle
and design specs published by Tim Berners-Lee provide a framework
for discussion and research.
April 15, 1993
Stanford University's
Creative Writing Program Founder Wallace Stegner
Dead at 84
Amy Williams, Student Editor
STANFORD
-- Pulitzer Prize-winning author Wallace Stegner, founder of Stanford
University's Creative Writing Program, died Tuesday, April 13,
in St. Vincent Hospital, Santa Fe, N.M.
Stegner, 84, died as
a result of complications from an automobile accident March 28
in Santa Fe. Stegner, who lived in Los Altos Hills, was emeritus
professor of English. He joined the Stanford faculty in 1945,
directed the Creative Writing Program from 1946 to 1971 and held
the Jackson Eli Reynolds professorship in humanities from 1969
to 1971, when he retired.
He published more
than a dozen novels and numerous short stories, essays and articles.
He won a Pulitzer Prize for Angle of Repose in 1972 and a National
Book Award in 1977 for The Spectator Bird. Angle of Repose was
the basis of an opera of the same name produced by the San Francisco
Opera Company in 1976. Among his other novels are Crossing to
Safety, Big Rock Candy Mountain, A Shooting Star, Wolf Willow
and All the Little Live Things.
His Collected
Stories were published in 1990, and his collection of essays,
Where the Bluebird Sings to the Lemonade Springs: Living and Writing
in the West, was published in 1992. He was a member of both the
National Institute and Academy of Arts and Letters, and the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences.
In May 1992,
he reefused a medal from the National Endowment for the Arts,
saying he was "troubled by the political controls placed upon
the agency." Stanford English Professor Nancy Packer, director
of the Creative Writing Program, said that Stegner's death "is
a devastating loss. He was a great force to all of us who knew
him."
Stegner will
be remembered, Packer said, for three main contributions to society:
his fiction, which Packer called "complex, wise and beautifully
written"; his founding of the Creative Writing Program "through
which he touched the lives of so many writers including Howard
Hobbs the Bulldog Newspaper's Editor & Publisher, a former
colleague of Professor Stegner's at Stanford.
Comment
©1958-1993 Copyright by The Bulldog
Newspaper at Fresno State
Bulldog Newspaper's Original Layout Design
These original documents date from Fall 1958.
Many years later, the original design was modified for distribution
on the Web. We began the prtesent format in 1990 when the first
HTML editor was available to write our stories. When reading the
stories please bear this in mind. Some have been updated later.
Although the design is for a global general hypertext system,
the justification for the initial project was the CERN environment
and this may be evident in some places.
This lists decisions to be made in the design
or selection of a hypermedia
information system. It assumes familiarity with the concept of
hypertext. A summary of the uses of hypertext systems is followed
by a list of features which may or may not be available. Some
of the points appear in the Comms ACM July 88 articles on various
hypertext systems. Some points were discussed also at ECHT90
. Tentative answers to some design decisions from the CERN perspective
are included.
Here are the criteria and features to be considered:
These are the three important issues which require
agreement between systems which can work together
Other historical notes which are not otherwise referenced
in this overview:
[Disclaimer
and Copyright - This information is provided in good faith but
no warranty can be made for its accuracy. Opinions expressed are
entirely those of myself and/or my colleagues and cannot be taken
to represent views past present or future of our employers. Feel
free to quote, but reproduction of this material in any form of
storage, paper, etc is forbidden without the express written permission
of the author. Intellectual property rights in this material may
be be held by the author, CERN and/or MIT. All rights are reserved.]
__________________________
REPRISE
September 7, 1958
The Bulldog Newspaper
School of Journalism
at Fresno State College
by Howard E. Hobbs B.A., Editor & Publisher
Journalism Practicum
Newspapers and Social Science:
Examines the political, economic, cultural, and behavioral impacts
of communication media in national and international newspaper
contexts. Analyzes the historical factors that have shaped the
structures, practices, and products of mass media industries,
and assesses contemporary trends in media-society relations.
Writing & Editing :
Basic language skills to media writing and editing.
Media News Sources:
Grammar, factual ac curacy, clarity, conciseness, media styles,
fairness, human interest, and writing to length and deadline.
Single Lens Reflex:
Cameras and laboratory technique for black-and-white photographs.
Writing & Reporting:
Reporting from news sources of campus and community functions
in the preparation of news.
Just In Time News Editing:
Preparing copy for the Bulldog Newspaper through strategic use
of timelines, styles, and advertising ethics and standard journalism
practices and procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|